Healthy ageing for older adult people with intellectual disability: a scoping review.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Nadia El Mrayyan, Marianne Holmgren, Gerd Ahlström
{"title":"Healthy ageing for older adult people with intellectual disability: a scoping review.","authors":"Nadia El Mrayyan, Marianne Holmgren, Gerd Ahlström","doi":"10.1186/s13690-025-01528-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The increasing longevity of people with intellectual disability creates a need for a healthy-ageing perspective, translated into evidence-based interventions in this multi-morbidity group. Accordingly, the aim of this scoping review was to identify, summarise and analyse the empirical research on healthy ageing in older adults with intellectual disability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review was based on the PRISMA 2020 guidelines for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and a PICO protocol (Patient/population, Intervention, Comparison/control, and Outcome). Empirical studies in English were included if they concerned older adults with intellectual disability with an average age of at least 45 and were based on a clearly expressed healthy-ageing perspective. An information specialist conducted a search in 11 databases with no geographical or temporal restrictions. Two independent researchers performed study selection, quality assessment and data extraction. Disagreements were resolved in consultation with a third researcher. A textual narrative synthesis was based on PICO domains and the seven research questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 11 studies were all from developed countries and had different designs: qualitative, mixed-method and one systematic review. Only three studies highlighted the term \"healthy ageing\", most used synonymous terms. Eight studies focused on healthy ageing on the individual level, three on the organisational and societal level. The intervention studies in the systematic review were mainly nonrandomised, concerned interventions varying in intensity and duration, considered different research questions and employed different outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings highlight a major knowledge gap concerning evidence-based interventions with a healthy-ageing perspective in the case of older adults with intellectual disability. There is an urgent need to initiate healthy-ageing studies in developing countries, where such people are even more vulnerable to stigma and discrimination than those in developed countries. Our findings confirm the need to scale up healthy-ageing interventions in line with the WHO's ambition to develop evidence-based approaches to optimise the functional capacity of all older people, including older adults with intellectual disability, by 2030.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>The study is registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), CRD42022337211 (13 June 2022).</p>","PeriodicalId":48578,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Public Health","volume":"83 1","pages":"55"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11866571/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-025-01528-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The increasing longevity of people with intellectual disability creates a need for a healthy-ageing perspective, translated into evidence-based interventions in this multi-morbidity group. Accordingly, the aim of this scoping review was to identify, summarise and analyse the empirical research on healthy ageing in older adults with intellectual disability.

Methods: This review was based on the PRISMA 2020 guidelines for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and a PICO protocol (Patient/population, Intervention, Comparison/control, and Outcome). Empirical studies in English were included if they concerned older adults with intellectual disability with an average age of at least 45 and were based on a clearly expressed healthy-ageing perspective. An information specialist conducted a search in 11 databases with no geographical or temporal restrictions. Two independent researchers performed study selection, quality assessment and data extraction. Disagreements were resolved in consultation with a third researcher. A textual narrative synthesis was based on PICO domains and the seven research questions.

Results: The 11 studies were all from developed countries and had different designs: qualitative, mixed-method and one systematic review. Only three studies highlighted the term "healthy ageing", most used synonymous terms. Eight studies focused on healthy ageing on the individual level, three on the organisational and societal level. The intervention studies in the systematic review were mainly nonrandomised, concerned interventions varying in intensity and duration, considered different research questions and employed different outcome measures.

Conclusions: The findings highlight a major knowledge gap concerning evidence-based interventions with a healthy-ageing perspective in the case of older adults with intellectual disability. There is an urgent need to initiate healthy-ageing studies in developing countries, where such people are even more vulnerable to stigma and discrimination than those in developed countries. Our findings confirm the need to scale up healthy-ageing interventions in line with the WHO's ambition to develop evidence-based approaches to optimise the functional capacity of all older people, including older adults with intellectual disability, by 2030.

Registration: The study is registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), CRD42022337211 (13 June 2022).

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Public Health
Archives of Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
244
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: rchives of Public Health is a broad scope public health journal, dedicated to publishing all sound science in the field of public health. The journal aims to better the understanding of the health of populations. The journal contributes to public health knowledge, enhances the interaction between research, policy and practice and stimulates public health monitoring and indicator development. The journal considers submissions on health outcomes and their determinants, with clear statements about the public health and policy implications. Archives of Public Health welcomes methodological papers (e.g., on study design and bias), papers on health services research, health economics, community interventions, and epidemiological studies dealing with international comparisons, the determinants of inequality in health, and the environmental, behavioural, social, demographic and occupational correlates of health and diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信