The Effects of Having Surgeon's Hands in Line of Vision During Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery: A Feasibility Study.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Balkis Zaitoun, Abdulrahman Maziek, Emad Eddin Dalla, Muhammad Eyad Ba'Ath
{"title":"The Effects of Having Surgeon's Hands in Line of Vision During Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery: A Feasibility Study.","authors":"Balkis Zaitoun, Abdulrahman Maziek, Emad Eddin Dalla, Muhammad Eyad Ba'Ath","doi":"10.1089/lap.2025.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Aim:</i></b> Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) provides improved cosmesis compared with multiport laparoscopy. However, it involves hand-clashing and cross-triangulation, making it challenging even for experienced surgeons to adopt in their practice. This study aims to assess the effect of providing an additional view of the surgeon's hands on task performance in SILS. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Surgically naive participants were recruited via volunteer sampling and instructed to perform tasks using a laparoscopic trainer set and a singular triport access device. A head-mounted camera was worn by the participant and angulated inferiorly to provide an additional view of the operators' hands. Both views were displayed on a 90″ monitor. Tasks were performed with and without the additional view in an alternating manner. Attempts were recorded and assessed blindly for duration and success. Chi-squared and Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> tests were applied as required. A <i>P</i> value <.05 was considered significant. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 467 attempts were conducted by 30 volunteers. The pass rates were 79.09% and 69.23% for the additional and traditional views, respectively (<i>P</i> = .015). A trend toward shorter durations was seen in attempts using the additional view (<i>P</i> = .128). Males (<i>P</i> = .003) and PC video game players (<i>P</i> = .022) were more likely to pass and mobile video game players were more likely to fail (<i>P</i> = .003). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The use of a head-mounted camera to directly visualize surgeon's hands enhances performance in an <i>ex vivo</i> setting. More research is needed to assess clinical impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"329-338"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2025.0005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) provides improved cosmesis compared with multiport laparoscopy. However, it involves hand-clashing and cross-triangulation, making it challenging even for experienced surgeons to adopt in their practice. This study aims to assess the effect of providing an additional view of the surgeon's hands on task performance in SILS. Methods: Surgically naive participants were recruited via volunteer sampling and instructed to perform tasks using a laparoscopic trainer set and a singular triport access device. A head-mounted camera was worn by the participant and angulated inferiorly to provide an additional view of the operators' hands. Both views were displayed on a 90″ monitor. Tasks were performed with and without the additional view in an alternating manner. Attempts were recorded and assessed blindly for duration and success. Chi-squared and Mann-Whitney U tests were applied as required. A P value <.05 was considered significant. Results: A total of 467 attempts were conducted by 30 volunteers. The pass rates were 79.09% and 69.23% for the additional and traditional views, respectively (P = .015). A trend toward shorter durations was seen in attempts using the additional view (P = .128). Males (P = .003) and PC video game players (P = .022) were more likely to pass and mobile video game players were more likely to fail (P = .003). Conclusion: The use of a head-mounted camera to directly visualize surgeon's hands enhances performance in an ex vivo setting. More research is needed to assess clinical impact.

单切口腹腔镜手术中外科医生的手在视线范围内的效果:可行性研究。
目的:与多切口腹腔镜手术相比,单切口腹腔镜手术提供了更好的美容效果。然而,它涉及手部碰撞和交叉三角剖分,即使是经验丰富的外科医生也很难在实践中采用。本研究旨在评估在SILS中提供外科医生的手对任务执行的额外观点的影响。方法:通过志愿者抽样招募手术新手参与者,并指导他们使用腹腔镜训练器和单一triport访问装置执行任务。参与者戴着头戴式相机,并在下方成角度,以提供操作员手的额外视图。两个视图都显示在90″显示器上。任务以交替的方式在有和没有附加视图的情况下执行。尝试被记录下来,盲目地评估持续时间和成功程度。根据需要采用卡方检验和Mann-Whitney U检验。结果:30名志愿者共进行了467次尝试。附加观点和传统观点的通过率分别为79.09%和69.23% (P = 0.015)。在使用附加视图的尝试中,可以看到持续时间较短的趋势(P = .128)。男性(P = 0.003)和PC电子游戏玩家(P = 0.022)更容易通过测试,而手机电子游戏玩家更容易失败(P = 0.003)。结论:在离体环境下,使用头戴式摄像机直接观察外科医生的手可以提高手术效果。需要更多的研究来评估临床影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信