Utility of stool Xpert MTB/Rif assay in the diagnosis of pulmonary and abdominal tuberculosis in children - A study from Western India.

IF 1.3 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Lung India Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-27 DOI:10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_528_24
Ira Shah, Dhruv N Gandhi, Dhruv Mamtora, Meenakshi Dey, Suhani Jain, Sonal Patil, Maneesha D'souza, Sanjay Mattoo, Daksha Shah, Varsha Puri, Minnie Bodhanwala
{"title":"Utility of stool Xpert MTB/Rif assay in the diagnosis of pulmonary and abdominal tuberculosis in children - A study from Western India.","authors":"Ira Shah, Dhruv N Gandhi, Dhruv Mamtora, Meenakshi Dey, Suhani Jain, Sonal Patil, Maneesha D'souza, Sanjay Mattoo, Daksha Shah, Varsha Puri, Minnie Bodhanwala","doi":"10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_528_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Microbiological diagnosis of pediatric pulmonary and intestinal tuberculosis remains difficult due to difficulty in specimen collection such as with sputum, gastric aspirates or intestinal biopsies. Stool Xpert MTB/Rif may be useful as specimen collection is non-invasive.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the sensitivity and specificity of Stool Xpert for the diagnosis of pulmonary or intestinal tuberculosis in Indian children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively compared the performance of stool Xpert, pulmonary sample Xpert (gastric lavage, sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage), and Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) for 52 children with pulmonary, intestinal or disseminated tuberculosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty (57.7%) children had positive pulmonary Xpert results, while 17(32.7%) had positive stool Xpert results. The sensitivity and specificity of stool Xpert compared to pulmonary Xpert was 43.3% and 81.8%, respectively. On using MGIT as a reference, pulmonary Xpert had a higher sensitivity compared to stool Xpert (81.8% vs. 63.6%, respectively) but lower specificity (48.8%vs.75.6%, respectively). Kappa analysis showed fair agreement between stool and pulmonary Xpert results (0.23), and moderate agreement between stool and gastric lavage Xpert results (0.43). Stool Xpert was found to be equivalent to pulmonary Xpert in detecting tuberculosis in children younger than 5 years (36.4% in both; 4 children each tested positive out of 11). No patients with isolated intestinal tuberculosis had positive stool Xpert.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Stool Xpert may serve as a supplementary diagnostic tool in paediatric tuberculosis, particularly in young children where specimen collection is difficult. However, its lower sensitivity compared to pulmonary samples limits its potential as a standalone test.</p>","PeriodicalId":47462,"journal":{"name":"Lung India","volume":"42 2","pages":"115-119"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11952729/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_528_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Microbiological diagnosis of pediatric pulmonary and intestinal tuberculosis remains difficult due to difficulty in specimen collection such as with sputum, gastric aspirates or intestinal biopsies. Stool Xpert MTB/Rif may be useful as specimen collection is non-invasive.

Objectives: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of Stool Xpert for the diagnosis of pulmonary or intestinal tuberculosis in Indian children.

Methods: We retrospectively compared the performance of stool Xpert, pulmonary sample Xpert (gastric lavage, sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage), and Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) for 52 children with pulmonary, intestinal or disseminated tuberculosis.

Results: Thirty (57.7%) children had positive pulmonary Xpert results, while 17(32.7%) had positive stool Xpert results. The sensitivity and specificity of stool Xpert compared to pulmonary Xpert was 43.3% and 81.8%, respectively. On using MGIT as a reference, pulmonary Xpert had a higher sensitivity compared to stool Xpert (81.8% vs. 63.6%, respectively) but lower specificity (48.8%vs.75.6%, respectively). Kappa analysis showed fair agreement between stool and pulmonary Xpert results (0.23), and moderate agreement between stool and gastric lavage Xpert results (0.43). Stool Xpert was found to be equivalent to pulmonary Xpert in detecting tuberculosis in children younger than 5 years (36.4% in both; 4 children each tested positive out of 11). No patients with isolated intestinal tuberculosis had positive stool Xpert.

Conclusion: Stool Xpert may serve as a supplementary diagnostic tool in paediatric tuberculosis, particularly in young children where specimen collection is difficult. However, its lower sensitivity compared to pulmonary samples limits its potential as a standalone test.

粪便Xpert MTB/Rif检测在儿童肺结核和腹部肺结核诊断中的应用——一项来自印度西部的研究。
背景:儿童肺和肠结核的微生物学诊断仍然很困难,因为标本收集困难,如痰、胃吸痰或肠道活检。粪便专家MTB/Rif可能有用,因为标本采集是非侵入性的。目的:确定大便专家诊断印度儿童肺或肠结核的敏感性和特异性。方法:回顾性比较52例肺、肠、播散性结核患儿的粪便Xpert、肺标本Xpert(洗胃、痰液、支气管肺泡灌洗)和分枝杆菌生长指示管(MGIT)的表现。结果:30例(57.7%)患儿肺Xpert结果阳性,17例(32.7%)患儿大便Xpert结果阳性。与肺Xpert相比,大便Xpert的敏感性和特异性分别为43.3%和81.8%。在使用MGIT作为参考时,肺部Xpert比大便Xpert具有更高的敏感性(分别为81.8%和63.6%),但特异性较低(分别为48.8%和75.6%)。Kappa分析显示大便和肺部Xpert结果基本一致(0.23),大便和洗胃Xpert结果中等一致(0.43)。在5岁以下儿童中,粪便Xpert与肺部Xpert检测结核病的效果相当(两者均为36.4%;11名儿童中有4名检测呈阳性。孤立性肠结核患者无粪便Xpert阳性。结论:粪便专家可作为儿科结核病的辅助诊断工具,特别是在标本采集困难的幼儿中。然而,与肺样本相比,其较低的灵敏度限制了其作为独立测试的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lung India
Lung India RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
114
审稿时长
37 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信