Small airway disease (SAD) in asthma in pregnancy evaluated by impulse oscillometry: A cross-sectional study.

IF 1.3 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Lung India Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-27 DOI:10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_413_24
Mita Mandal, Indranil Halder, Subhankar Sarkar, Arman Haque, Manidip Pal
{"title":"Small airway disease (SAD) in asthma in pregnancy evaluated by impulse oscillometry: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Mita Mandal, Indranil Halder, Subhankar Sarkar, Arman Haque, Manidip Pal","doi":"10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_413_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Asthma is a common respiratory disease in pregnancy, with approximately 18% of cases worsening. Small airway disease (SAD) with a reported prevalence of up to 70% is now recognised as a principal indicator of poor asthma control. Impulse oscillometry (IOS) is a non-invasive, technically easier, and patient-friendly tool for detecting SAD. We aimed to assess the prevalence of SAD in pregnant women with asthma and the acceptance of the IOS across different trimesters of pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted among pregnant women aged ≥18 years with clinically diagnosed asthma. All patients underwent IOS following manufacturer and European Respiratory Society guidelines. A questionnaire was used to assess their satisfaction with the technique.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 78 patients who underwent IOS, SAD was present in 55.1% (95% CI = 43.4 to 66.4%). Post-bronchodilator reversibility was observed in 37.2% of patients. Abnormal total (R5) and larger (R20) airway resistance were found in 79.5% and 64.1% of patients, respectively. Other IOS parameters (Fres, AX, and X5) were abnormal in 58.9%, 30.7%, and 39.7% of patients, respectively. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses indicated longer duration of asthma (OR = 1.1; 95% CI = 1.05-1.18; P < 0.001) and passive smoking (OR = 4.2; 95% CI = 1.58-11.1; P = 0.004) were significantly associated with SAD. All participants tolerated the IOS well, with a satisfaction score of 4.75 ± 0.72.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The IOS is a helpful tool for the evaluation of SAD, a significant comorbidity in pregnant women with asthma. Factors such as longer disease duration and exposure to passive smoking, akin to risk factors for chronic airflow obstruction, are significantly associated with SAD. Future research should explore SAD's impact on clinical management and overall asthma outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47462,"journal":{"name":"Lung India","volume":"42 2","pages":"87-90"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11952735/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_413_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Asthma is a common respiratory disease in pregnancy, with approximately 18% of cases worsening. Small airway disease (SAD) with a reported prevalence of up to 70% is now recognised as a principal indicator of poor asthma control. Impulse oscillometry (IOS) is a non-invasive, technically easier, and patient-friendly tool for detecting SAD. We aimed to assess the prevalence of SAD in pregnant women with asthma and the acceptance of the IOS across different trimesters of pregnancy.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among pregnant women aged ≥18 years with clinically diagnosed asthma. All patients underwent IOS following manufacturer and European Respiratory Society guidelines. A questionnaire was used to assess their satisfaction with the technique.

Results: Out of 78 patients who underwent IOS, SAD was present in 55.1% (95% CI = 43.4 to 66.4%). Post-bronchodilator reversibility was observed in 37.2% of patients. Abnormal total (R5) and larger (R20) airway resistance were found in 79.5% and 64.1% of patients, respectively. Other IOS parameters (Fres, AX, and X5) were abnormal in 58.9%, 30.7%, and 39.7% of patients, respectively. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses indicated longer duration of asthma (OR = 1.1; 95% CI = 1.05-1.18; P < 0.001) and passive smoking (OR = 4.2; 95% CI = 1.58-11.1; P = 0.004) were significantly associated with SAD. All participants tolerated the IOS well, with a satisfaction score of 4.75 ± 0.72.

Conclusion: The IOS is a helpful tool for the evaluation of SAD, a significant comorbidity in pregnant women with asthma. Factors such as longer disease duration and exposure to passive smoking, akin to risk factors for chronic airflow obstruction, are significantly associated with SAD. Future research should explore SAD's impact on clinical management and overall asthma outcomes.

小气道疾病(SAD)在妊娠哮喘评估脉冲振荡:一项横断面研究。
背景与目的:哮喘是妊娠期常见的呼吸系统疾病,约18%的病例病情加重。据报道,小气道疾病(SAD)的患病率高达70%,现在被认为是哮喘控制不良的主要指标。脉冲振荡法(IOS)是一种非侵入性、技术上更简单、对患者友好的检测SAD的工具。我们的目的是评估哮喘孕妇中SAD的患病率以及不同妊娠期对IOS的接受程度。方法:本横断面研究纳入年龄≥18岁临床诊断为哮喘的孕妇。所有患者均按照制造商和欧洲呼吸学会指南进行了IOS治疗。一份调查问卷被用来评估他们对这项技术的满意度。结果:78例接受IOS的患者中,有55.1%出现SAD (95% CI = 43.4 - 66.4%)。37.2%的患者出现支气管扩张剂后可逆性。总气道阻力异常(R5)和较大气道阻力(R20)分别占79.5%和64.1%。其他IOS参数(Fres、AX和X5)异常分别为58.9%、30.7%和39.7%。双因素和多因素logistic回归分析显示哮喘持续时间更长(OR = 1.1;95% ci = 1.05-1.18;P < 0.001)和被动吸烟(OR = 4.2;95% ci = 1.58-11.1;P = 0.004)与SAD显著相关。所有参与者对IOS的耐受性良好,满意度得分为4.75±0.72。结论:IOS是评估妊娠哮喘患者SAD的有效工具。与慢性气流阻塞的危险因素类似,疾病持续时间较长和被动吸烟暴露等因素与SAD显著相关。未来的研究应该探索SAD对临床管理和整体哮喘结局的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lung India
Lung India RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
114
审稿时长
37 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信