Critical theory and cultural competency in medical QI projects: lessons from Pacific Islander communities.

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY
Adam Martorana, Sankalp Katta, Hanna Huynh, Ezgi Ulger, Jeffrey Andrion
{"title":"Critical theory and cultural competency in medical QI projects: lessons from Pacific Islander communities.","authors":"Adam Martorana, Sankalp Katta, Hanna Huynh, Ezgi Ulger, Jeffrey Andrion","doi":"10.1017/S0021932025000100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This reflection explores the transformative power of critical theory through a quality improvement (QI) project creating culturally relevant dietary resources for Pacific Islander communities in Washington State, USA. Food injustice and lack of food sovereignty are examined as manifestations of modern-day colonialism perpetuated by capitalist-driven social structures. The methodology employed critical reflection, defined as the process of examining assumptions and power relations that shape practice, central to critical theory. Iterative group discussions aimed to understand the impact of individual and collective assumptions, power dynamics, and oppression on the project's conceptualization, implementation, and evaluation.Specific recommendations are integrated into the discussion to aid those replicating similar protocols, emphasizing actionable steps such as engaging with the community at all project stages. The research team, composed of osteopathic medical students and a critical theory expert, engaged in reflexivity to understand how social locations and lived experiences influenced perceptions. Despite the goal of fostering cultural inclusivity, limitations in engaging the Pacific Islander community throughout the project lifecycle highlighted the need for cultural humility and participatory action methodology.This study underscores the importance of understanding the history and socio-political context of marginalized communities to avoid perpetuating colonial practices and trauma. It emphasizes the necessity for medical schools to incorporate sociological theories into curricula to promote compassionate, culturally appropriate care and research. By critically examining positionality and engaging in transformative learning, the group advocates for systemic changes towards a more equitable global healthcare system.Through critical reflection, the group has come to understand how lived experiences have shaped perceptions of oppression, which are entrenched within and perpetuated by social institutions. Actionable items from these reflections are presented to help future practitioners and educators apply cultural humility, community empowerment, and critical theory in QI projects.</p>","PeriodicalId":47742,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biosocial Science","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biosocial Science","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932025000100","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This reflection explores the transformative power of critical theory through a quality improvement (QI) project creating culturally relevant dietary resources for Pacific Islander communities in Washington State, USA. Food injustice and lack of food sovereignty are examined as manifestations of modern-day colonialism perpetuated by capitalist-driven social structures. The methodology employed critical reflection, defined as the process of examining assumptions and power relations that shape practice, central to critical theory. Iterative group discussions aimed to understand the impact of individual and collective assumptions, power dynamics, and oppression on the project's conceptualization, implementation, and evaluation.Specific recommendations are integrated into the discussion to aid those replicating similar protocols, emphasizing actionable steps such as engaging with the community at all project stages. The research team, composed of osteopathic medical students and a critical theory expert, engaged in reflexivity to understand how social locations and lived experiences influenced perceptions. Despite the goal of fostering cultural inclusivity, limitations in engaging the Pacific Islander community throughout the project lifecycle highlighted the need for cultural humility and participatory action methodology.This study underscores the importance of understanding the history and socio-political context of marginalized communities to avoid perpetuating colonial practices and trauma. It emphasizes the necessity for medical schools to incorporate sociological theories into curricula to promote compassionate, culturally appropriate care and research. By critically examining positionality and engaging in transformative learning, the group advocates for systemic changes towards a more equitable global healthcare system.Through critical reflection, the group has come to understand how lived experiences have shaped perceptions of oppression, which are entrenched within and perpetuated by social institutions. Actionable items from these reflections are presented to help future practitioners and educators apply cultural humility, community empowerment, and critical theory in QI projects.

批判理论和文化能力在医疗QI项目:来自太平洋岛民社区的经验教训。
本反思探讨了批判性理论的变革力量,通过质量改进(QI)项目,为美国华盛顿州的太平洋岛民社区创造与文化相关的饮食资源。粮食不公正和缺乏粮食主权被视为资本主义驱动的社会结构所延续的现代殖民主义的表现形式。该方法论采用批判性反思,定义为检验塑造实践的假设和权力关系的过程,这是批判性理论的核心。迭代的小组讨论旨在理解个人和集体假设、权力动态以及对项目概念化、实现和评估的压迫的影响。具体的建议被整合到讨论中,以帮助那些复制类似协议的人,强调可操作的步骤,例如在所有项目阶段与社区接触。研究小组由骨科医学院学生和一名批判理论专家组成,他们利用反身性来理解社会位置和生活经历如何影响感知。尽管目标是促进文化包容性,但在整个项目生命周期中,太平洋岛民社区参与的局限性突出了文化谦逊和参与性行动方法的必要性。这项研究强调了了解边缘化社区的历史和社会政治背景的重要性,以避免殖民行为和创伤的延续。它强调医学院必须将社会学理论纳入课程,以促进富有同情心的、文化上适当的护理和研究。通过批判性地审视定位和参与变革性学习,该组织倡导朝着更公平的全球医疗保健系统进行系统性变革。通过批判性的反思,该小组开始理解生活经历如何塑造了对压迫的看法,这种看法在社会制度中根深蒂固并得以延续。从这些反思中提出了可操作的项目,以帮助未来的从业者和教育者在QI项目中应用文化谦逊、社区赋权和批判理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
108
期刊介绍: Journal of Biosocial Science is a leading interdisciplinary and international journal in the field of biosocial science, the common ground between biology and sociology. It acts as an essential reference guide for all biological and social scientists working in these interdisciplinary areas, including social and biological aspects of reproduction and its control, gerontology, ecology, genetics, applied psychology, sociology, education, criminology, demography, health and epidemiology. Publishing original research papers, short reports, reviews, lectures and book reviews, the journal also includes a Debate section that encourages readers" comments on specific articles, with subsequent response from the original author.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信