Portal vein velocity and its dynamics: a potentially useful tool for detecting clinically silent transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt dysfunction using Doppler ultrasonography.

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Ultrasound International Open Pub Date : 2024-12-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2422-8339
Rareș Crăciun, Horia Ștefănescu, Oana Nicoară-Farcău, Petra Fischer, Andreea Fodor, Marcel Tanţău, Corina Radu, Zeno Spârchez, Bogdan Procopeţ
{"title":"Portal vein velocity and its dynamics: a potentially useful tool for detecting clinically silent transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt dysfunction using Doppler ultrasonography.","authors":"Rareș Crăciun, Horia Ștefănescu, Oana Nicoară-Farcău, Petra Fischer, Andreea Fodor, Marcel Tanţău, Corina Radu, Zeno Spârchez, Bogdan Procopeţ","doi":"10.1055/a-2422-8339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>   Ultrasound (US) surveillance for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) dysfunction has yet to be standardized, as clear-cut criteria have not been conventionally defined. This study evaluated the role of US-based parameters in detecting hemodynamic TIPS dysfunction (HD). <b>Methods</b>   We included consecutive patients treated with TIPS. All patients were scheduled within the first six weeks after the procedure for TIPS revision, comprised of a Doppler US exam and invasive hemodynamic reassessment. Clinical TIPS dysfunction (CD) was defined as symptom recurrence, while HD was defined by a portal pressure gradient (PPG)≥12 mmHg. The predictive capabilities of Doppler US for predicting TIPS dysfunction were tested against the hemodynamic gold standard. <b>Results</b>   86 patients were included. Secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding was the main indication for TIPS in 72 patients (83.7%), while 27 (31.4%) had refractory ascites. HD occurred in 37 cases (43%), of which 25 patients (67.5%) had no CD. Patients with HD had a significantly lower portal vein velocity (PVV): 35 (20-45) cm/s vs. 40.5 (35-50) cm/s, p=0.02. Compared to the immediate post-TIPS assessment, the patients without HD had a ΔPVV of 6.08±19.8 cm/s vs. a decrease of - 8.2±20.2 cm/s in HD (p=0.04). Using a cut-off value of 40.5 cm/s, PVV had an AUROC of 0.705 for predicting HD, while the addition of ΔPVV (cut-off 9.5 cm/s) improved the AUROC to 0.78. <b>Conclusion</b>   Despite adequate symptom control, a considerable percentage of patients have a post-TIPS PPG≥12 mmHg. The dynamic assessment of PVV and its temporal dynamics can reliably predict TIPS dysfunction.</p>","PeriodicalId":44852,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound International Open","volume":"10 ","pages":"a24228339"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11863994/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2422-8339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background   Ultrasound (US) surveillance for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) dysfunction has yet to be standardized, as clear-cut criteria have not been conventionally defined. This study evaluated the role of US-based parameters in detecting hemodynamic TIPS dysfunction (HD). Methods   We included consecutive patients treated with TIPS. All patients were scheduled within the first six weeks after the procedure for TIPS revision, comprised of a Doppler US exam and invasive hemodynamic reassessment. Clinical TIPS dysfunction (CD) was defined as symptom recurrence, while HD was defined by a portal pressure gradient (PPG)≥12 mmHg. The predictive capabilities of Doppler US for predicting TIPS dysfunction were tested against the hemodynamic gold standard. Results   86 patients were included. Secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding was the main indication for TIPS in 72 patients (83.7%), while 27 (31.4%) had refractory ascites. HD occurred in 37 cases (43%), of which 25 patients (67.5%) had no CD. Patients with HD had a significantly lower portal vein velocity (PVV): 35 (20-45) cm/s vs. 40.5 (35-50) cm/s, p=0.02. Compared to the immediate post-TIPS assessment, the patients without HD had a ΔPVV of 6.08±19.8 cm/s vs. a decrease of - 8.2±20.2 cm/s in HD (p=0.04). Using a cut-off value of 40.5 cm/s, PVV had an AUROC of 0.705 for predicting HD, while the addition of ΔPVV (cut-off 9.5 cm/s) improved the AUROC to 0.78. Conclusion   Despite adequate symptom control, a considerable percentage of patients have a post-TIPS PPG≥12 mmHg. The dynamic assessment of PVV and its temporal dynamics can reliably predict TIPS dysfunction.

门静脉流速及其动力学:应用多普勒超声检测临床无症状经颈静脉肝内门静脉-全身分流功能障碍的潜在有用工具。
超声(US)监测经颈静脉肝内门静脉系统分流(TIPS)功能障碍尚未标准化,因为明确的标准尚未常规定义。本研究评估了美国参数在检测血流动力学TIPS功能障碍(HD)中的作用。方法纳入连续接受TIPS治疗的患者。所有患者被安排在手术后的前六周内进行TIPS翻修,包括多普勒超声检查和有创血流动力学重新评估。临床TIPS功能障碍(CD)定义为症状复发,而HD定义为门静脉压力梯度(PPG)≥12 mmHg。根据血流动力学金标准测试了多普勒超声预测TIPS功能障碍的预测能力。结果共纳入86例患者。72例(83.7%)患者以静脉曲张出血二级预防为TIPS的主要适应证,27例(31.4%)患者有难治性腹水。HD发生37例(43%),其中25例(67.5%)无CD。HD患者门静脉流速(PVV)明显降低,分别为35 (20-45)cm/s和40.5 (35-50)cm/s, p=0.02。与tips后立即评估相比,无HD患者的ΔPVV为6.08±19.8 cm/s, HD患者为- 8.2±20.2 cm/s (p=0.04)。使用截断值40.5 cm/s, PVV预测HD的AUROC为0.705,而添加ΔPVV(截断值9.5 cm/s)将AUROC提高到0.78。结论:尽管有适当的症状控制,相当比例的患者tips后PPG≥12 mmHg。动态评估PVV及其时间动态可以可靠地预测TIPS功能障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ultrasound International Open
Ultrasound International Open RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信