The Effects of Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management on Loneliness, Spiritual Well-Being, Anxiety, and Depression in Patients with Unresectable Advanced Gastric Carcinoma: A Randomized, Controlled Study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-25 Epub Date: 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1620/tjem.2025.J025
Shuli Xia
{"title":"The Effects of Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management on Loneliness, Spiritual Well-Being, Anxiety, and Depression in Patients with Unresectable Advanced Gastric Carcinoma: A Randomized, Controlled Study.","authors":"Shuli Xia","doi":"10.1620/tjem.2025.J025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive behavioral stress management (CBSM) is an effective intervention for reducing psychological symptoms. This randomized, controlled study investigated the effects of CBSM on loneliness, spiritual well-being, anxiety, and depression in patients with unresectable advanced gastric carcinoma (GC). This study randomized 128 eligible patients into two groups: the CBSM group (N = 64), to receive 12-week CBSM plus normal care (NC), and the NC group (N = 64), to receive 12-week NC alone. The University of California-Los Angeles Loneliness Scale (UCLA-LS), functional assessment of chronic illness therapy-spiritual well-being scale (FACIT-Sp), and self-rating anxiety/depression scale (SAS/SDS) scores were assessed at week (W)0, W4, W8, and W12 in both groups. SAS-anxiety/SDS-depression was defined as SAS/SDS score ≥ 50. Compared to the NC group, the CBSM group showed lower UCLA-LS scores at W8 (P = 0.036) and W12 (P = 0.004), indicating an alleviation of loneliness. Compared with the NC group, the FACIT-Sp scores at W4 (P = 0.015), W8 (P = 0.023), and W12 (P < 0.001) were greater in the CBSM group, indicating a better spiritual status. Additionally, the CBSM group indicated reduced SAS score at W8 (P = 0.006) and W12 (P = 0.003), SAS-anxiety rate at W8 (P = 0.038) and W12 (P = 0.036), as well as SDS score at W12 (P = 0.015) than the NC group. Subgroup analyses revealed that CBSM had a greater beneficial effect on reducing the UCLA-LS, SAS, and SDS scores and increasing the FACIT-Sp score than NC in patients with SAS-anxiety or SDS-depression at W0. In conclusion, CBSM may ameliorate loneliness, enhance spiritual well-being, and reduce anxiety in patients with unresectable advanced GC.</p>","PeriodicalId":23187,"journal":{"name":"Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"71-79"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1620/tjem.2025.J025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cognitive behavioral stress management (CBSM) is an effective intervention for reducing psychological symptoms. This randomized, controlled study investigated the effects of CBSM on loneliness, spiritual well-being, anxiety, and depression in patients with unresectable advanced gastric carcinoma (GC). This study randomized 128 eligible patients into two groups: the CBSM group (N = 64), to receive 12-week CBSM plus normal care (NC), and the NC group (N = 64), to receive 12-week NC alone. The University of California-Los Angeles Loneliness Scale (UCLA-LS), functional assessment of chronic illness therapy-spiritual well-being scale (FACIT-Sp), and self-rating anxiety/depression scale (SAS/SDS) scores were assessed at week (W)0, W4, W8, and W12 in both groups. SAS-anxiety/SDS-depression was defined as SAS/SDS score ≥ 50. Compared to the NC group, the CBSM group showed lower UCLA-LS scores at W8 (P = 0.036) and W12 (P = 0.004), indicating an alleviation of loneliness. Compared with the NC group, the FACIT-Sp scores at W4 (P = 0.015), W8 (P = 0.023), and W12 (P < 0.001) were greater in the CBSM group, indicating a better spiritual status. Additionally, the CBSM group indicated reduced SAS score at W8 (P = 0.006) and W12 (P = 0.003), SAS-anxiety rate at W8 (P = 0.038) and W12 (P = 0.036), as well as SDS score at W12 (P = 0.015) than the NC group. Subgroup analyses revealed that CBSM had a greater beneficial effect on reducing the UCLA-LS, SAS, and SDS scores and increasing the FACIT-Sp score than NC in patients with SAS-anxiety or SDS-depression at W0. In conclusion, CBSM may ameliorate loneliness, enhance spiritual well-being, and reduce anxiety in patients with unresectable advanced GC.

认知行为应激管理对不可切除晚期胃癌患者孤独感、精神健康、焦虑和抑郁的影响:一项随机对照研究
认知行为应激管理(CBSM)是减轻心理症状的有效干预手段。本随机对照研究探讨了CBSM对晚期胃癌(GC)患者的孤独感、精神幸福感、焦虑和抑郁的影响。本研究将128名符合条件的患者随机分为两组:CBSM组(N = 64),接受12周的CBSM加正常护理(NC), NC组(N = 64),接受12周的NC。分别于第0周、第4周、第8周和第12周对两组患者进行加州大学洛杉矶分校孤独量表(UCLA-LS)、慢性疾病治疗-精神健康功能评估量表(FACIT-Sp)和焦虑/抑郁自评量表(SAS/SDS)评分。SAS-焦虑/SDS-抑郁定义为SAS/SDS评分≥50。与NC组相比,CBSM组UCLA-LS得分W8 (P = 0.036)和W12 (P = 0.004)较低,表明孤独感有所缓解。与NC组相比,CBSM组在W4 (P = 0.015)、W8 (P = 0.023)和W12 (P < 0.001)的FACIT-Sp得分更高,表明CBSM组精神状态较好。此外,CBSM组在W8 (P = 0.006)和W12 (P = 0.003)时的SAS评分、W8 (P = 0.038)和W12 (P = 0.036)时的SAS焦虑率以及W12时的SDS评分均低于NC组(P = 0.015)。亚组分析显示,与NC相比,CBSM在降低W0时SAS-焦虑或SDS-抑郁患者的UCLA-LS、SAS和SDS评分和提高FACIT-Sp评分方面具有更大的有益作用。综上所述,CBSM可以改善晚期胃癌患者的孤独感,增强精神幸福感,减少焦虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
171
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Our mission is to publish peer-reviewed papers in all branches of medical sciences including basic medicine, social medicine, clinical medicine, nursing sciences and disaster-prevention science, and to present new information of exceptional novelty, importance and interest to a broad readership of the TJEM. The TJEM is open to original articles in all branches of medical sciences from authors throughout the world. The TJEM also covers the fields of disaster-prevention science, including earthquake archeology. Case reports, which advance significantly our knowledge on medical sciences or practice, are also accepted. Review articles, Letters to the Editor, Commentary, and News and Views will also be considered. In particular, the TJEM welcomes full papers requiring prompt publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信