Comparison of Online with Offline Cognitive-Behavioral Stress Caring Program in Prostate Cancer Survivors after Prostatectomy: A Prospective, Propensity Score-Matched, Cohort Study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine Pub Date : 2025-08-21 Epub Date: 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1620/tjem.2025.J030
Hong Qu, Bingbing Song, Yang Lin, Jiao Liu
{"title":"Comparison of Online with Offline Cognitive-Behavioral Stress Caring Program in Prostate Cancer Survivors after Prostatectomy: A Prospective, Propensity Score-Matched, Cohort Study.","authors":"Hong Qu, Bingbing Song, Yang Lin, Jiao Liu","doi":"10.1620/tjem.2025.J030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Offline cognitive-behavioral stress caring program (CBSC) modifies maladaptive cognition and improves management stress skills, which relieves mental disorders in some cancer patients; however, it is limited by space and time. This study compared the effect of online and offline CBSC on mental health, spiritual well-being, fatigue, and patient satisfaction in prostate cancer survivors after prostatectomy. Totally, 147 prostate cancer survivors after prostatectomy were divided into offline (n = 89) and online (n = 58) CBSC groups. CBSC included stress management, relaxation, disease-relevant education, and weekly homework. Selection bias was adjusted by matching patients in both groups (1:1) using propensity scores (n = 58 in both groups after adjustment). Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)-anxiety, HADS-depression, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-SP), the brief fatigue inventory-China (BFI-C), and patient satisfaction score (PSS) were evaluated. 'Improvement' was defined as positive improvement values in indexes after a 10-week CBSC. Before and after adjustment, HADS-anxiety, HADS-depression, FACIT-SP, BFI-severity, and BFI-interference scores were improved at week 10 vs. baseline in the online or offline CBSC group. However, these scores did not vary at baseline or week 10 between groups. The improvement of HADS-anxiety, HADS-depression, and FACIT-SP scores was smaller in online CBSC group than in offline CBSC group. The improvement of BFI-severity and BFI-interference scores were non-differential between groups. PSS scores were reduced in online CBSC group vs. offline CBSC group. Overall, online CBSC alleviates mental disorders, elevates satisfaction, and relieves fatigue in prostate cancer survivors after prostatectomy, but its overall effect is less than offline CBSC.</p>","PeriodicalId":23187,"journal":{"name":"Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"343-351"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1620/tjem.2025.J030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Offline cognitive-behavioral stress caring program (CBSC) modifies maladaptive cognition and improves management stress skills, which relieves mental disorders in some cancer patients; however, it is limited by space and time. This study compared the effect of online and offline CBSC on mental health, spiritual well-being, fatigue, and patient satisfaction in prostate cancer survivors after prostatectomy. Totally, 147 prostate cancer survivors after prostatectomy were divided into offline (n = 89) and online (n = 58) CBSC groups. CBSC included stress management, relaxation, disease-relevant education, and weekly homework. Selection bias was adjusted by matching patients in both groups (1:1) using propensity scores (n = 58 in both groups after adjustment). Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)-anxiety, HADS-depression, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-SP), the brief fatigue inventory-China (BFI-C), and patient satisfaction score (PSS) were evaluated. 'Improvement' was defined as positive improvement values in indexes after a 10-week CBSC. Before and after adjustment, HADS-anxiety, HADS-depression, FACIT-SP, BFI-severity, and BFI-interference scores were improved at week 10 vs. baseline in the online or offline CBSC group. However, these scores did not vary at baseline or week 10 between groups. The improvement of HADS-anxiety, HADS-depression, and FACIT-SP scores was smaller in online CBSC group than in offline CBSC group. The improvement of BFI-severity and BFI-interference scores were non-differential between groups. PSS scores were reduced in online CBSC group vs. offline CBSC group. Overall, online CBSC alleviates mental disorders, elevates satisfaction, and relieves fatigue in prostate cancer survivors after prostatectomy, but its overall effect is less than offline CBSC.

前列腺切除术后前列腺癌幸存者在线与离线认知行为应激护理项目的比较:一项前瞻性、倾向评分匹配的队列研究。
离线认知行为应激关怀项目(CBSC)改善癌症患者的认知适应不良,提高应激管理技能,缓解癌症患者的精神障碍;然而,它受到空间和时间的限制。本研究比较了在线和离线CBSC对前列腺癌切除术后患者心理健康、精神健康、疲劳和患者满意度的影响。147例前列腺切除术后的前列腺癌幸存者被分为离线(n = 89)和在线(n = 58) CBSC组。CBSC包括压力管理、放松、疾病相关教育和每周家庭作业。通过使用倾向评分(调整后两组n = 58)匹配两组患者(1:1)来调整选择偏倚。对医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)-焦虑、HADS-抑郁、慢性疾病治疗功能评估精神幸福感量表(FACIT-SP)、中国简易疲劳量表(BFI-C)和患者满意度评分(PSS)进行评估。“改善”被定义为10周CBSC后各项指标的积极改善值。调整前后,与基线相比,在线或离线CBSC组的hads -焦虑、hads -抑郁、FACIT-SP、bfi -严重程度和bfi -干扰评分在第10周均有改善。然而,这些分数在基线或第10周时各组之间没有变化。在线CBSC组对hads -焦虑、hads -抑郁和FACIT-SP评分的改善小于离线CBSC组。bfi严重程度和bfi干扰评分的改善在两组间无差异。在线CBSC组与离线CBSC组相比,PSS评分降低。总体而言,在线CBSC可以缓解前列腺癌切除术后幸存者的精神障碍,提高满意度,缓解疲劳,但其整体效果不如线下CBSC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
171
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Our mission is to publish peer-reviewed papers in all branches of medical sciences including basic medicine, social medicine, clinical medicine, nursing sciences and disaster-prevention science, and to present new information of exceptional novelty, importance and interest to a broad readership of the TJEM. The TJEM is open to original articles in all branches of medical sciences from authors throughout the world. The TJEM also covers the fields of disaster-prevention science, including earthquake archeology. Case reports, which advance significantly our knowledge on medical sciences or practice, are also accepted. Review articles, Letters to the Editor, Commentary, and News and Views will also be considered. In particular, the TJEM welcomes full papers requiring prompt publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信