Clinical significance of para-aortic lymph node metastasis for prognosis in patients with pancreaticobiliary cancer who underwent radical surgical resections.

IF 0.5 Q4 SURGERY
Atsushi Nanashima, Junichi Arai, Masahide Hiyoshi, Naoya Imamura, Takeomi Hamada, Yuki Tsuchimochi, Ikko Shimizu, Takahiro Ochiai, Hiroshi Kawakami, Yuichiro Sato, Wada Takashi
{"title":"Clinical significance of para-aortic lymph node metastasis for prognosis in patients with pancreaticobiliary cancer who underwent radical surgical resections.","authors":"Atsushi Nanashima, Junichi Arai, Masahide Hiyoshi, Naoya Imamura, Takeomi Hamada, Yuki Tsuchimochi, Ikko Shimizu, Takahiro Ochiai, Hiroshi Kawakami, Yuichiro Sato, Wada Takashi","doi":"10.47717/turkjsurg.2025.6587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To elucidate surgical strategies for patients undergoing radical resection, in cases where solitary distant lymph node metastasis is identified intraoperatively, we investigated the prognostic significance of para-aortic lymph node (PALN) metastases and other regional lymph node (RLN) metastases in pancreatic carcinomas (PC) and biliary duct cancers (BDC).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This study retrospectively analyzed data from 181 PC patients and 116 BDC patients who underwent radical resections at two institutions between 1994 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among PC patients, metastases were observed in RLN and PALN in 54% and 9% of cases, respectively. Similarly, RLN and PALN metastases were present among BDC patients in 39% and 9% of cases, respectively. Survival analysis revealed that patients with BDC and PALN metastases exhibited significantly reduced disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to those without PALN involvement. Multivariate analysis identified PALN metastasis as an independent predictor of OS in BDC patients (p<0.05), while RLN metastasis was independently associated with DFS (p<0.05). Additional clinicopathological factors associated with PALN and RLN metastases were also identified. Preoperative serum levels of Duke Pancreas II monoclonal antibody were significantly elevated in patients with PALN metastases. Histological findings of lymphatic or perineural infiltration and hepatic or pancreatic invasion were independently associated with RLN metastases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on these findings, radical resection may be considered for PC patients with isolated PALN metastases only in the absence of additional adverse prognostic factors. Prospective clinical trials are warranted to further refine the criteria for surgical intervention when solitary PALN metastases are detected intraoperatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":23374,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Surgery","volume":"41 1","pages":"5-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11878181/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47717/turkjsurg.2025.6587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To elucidate surgical strategies for patients undergoing radical resection, in cases where solitary distant lymph node metastasis is identified intraoperatively, we investigated the prognostic significance of para-aortic lymph node (PALN) metastases and other regional lymph node (RLN) metastases in pancreatic carcinomas (PC) and biliary duct cancers (BDC).

Material and methods: This study retrospectively analyzed data from 181 PC patients and 116 BDC patients who underwent radical resections at two institutions between 1994 and 2021.

Results: Among PC patients, metastases were observed in RLN and PALN in 54% and 9% of cases, respectively. Similarly, RLN and PALN metastases were present among BDC patients in 39% and 9% of cases, respectively. Survival analysis revealed that patients with BDC and PALN metastases exhibited significantly reduced disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to those without PALN involvement. Multivariate analysis identified PALN metastasis as an independent predictor of OS in BDC patients (p<0.05), while RLN metastasis was independently associated with DFS (p<0.05). Additional clinicopathological factors associated with PALN and RLN metastases were also identified. Preoperative serum levels of Duke Pancreas II monoclonal antibody were significantly elevated in patients with PALN metastases. Histological findings of lymphatic or perineural infiltration and hepatic or pancreatic invasion were independently associated with RLN metastases.

Conclusion: Based on these findings, radical resection may be considered for PC patients with isolated PALN metastases only in the absence of additional adverse prognostic factors. Prospective clinical trials are warranted to further refine the criteria for surgical intervention when solitary PALN metastases are detected intraoperatively.

胰胆管癌根治性手术切除患者主动脉旁淋巴结转移对预后的临床意义。
目的:探讨胰腺癌(PC)和胆管癌(BDC)中主动脉旁淋巴结(PALN)转移和其他区域淋巴结(RLN)转移对根治性切除术患者预后的影响,以阐明术中发现单发远处淋巴结转移的手术策略。材料和方法:本研究回顾性分析了1994年至2021年间在两家机构接受根治性手术的181例PC患者和116例BDC患者的数据。结果:PC患者中,RLN和PALN的转移率分别为54%和9%。同样,BDC患者中RLN和PALN的转移率分别为39%和9%。生存分析显示,与没有PALN转移的患者相比,BDC和PALN转移患者的无病(DFS)和总生存(OS)显着降低。多因素分析发现PALN转移是BDC患者OS的独立预测因素(结论:基于这些发现,只有在没有其他不良预后因素的情况下,才可以考虑对孤立PALN转移的PC患者进行根治性切除术。当术中发现孤立性PALN转移时,需要进行前瞻性临床试验以进一步完善手术干预标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信