'I want to know that it's worth me attending': A qualitative analysis of consumers' decisions not to attend their chronic pain group education session.

IF 1.3 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Amelia K Searle, Cindy L Wall, Celia Tan, Peter Herriot
{"title":"'I want to know that it's worth me attending': A qualitative analysis of consumers' decisions not to attend their chronic pain group education session.","authors":"Amelia K Searle, Cindy L Wall, Celia Tan, Peter Herriot","doi":"10.1177/20494637251322977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Many pain clinics encourage/mandate attendance at introductory group pain education sessions. Despite high non-attendance rates, no studies have examined consumer-reported reasons for non-attendance. <b>Purpose:</b> The aim of this study was to better understand why consumers fail to attend their pain education session. <b>Research Design and Study Sample:</b> We attempted to contact all non-attendees of our South Australian tertiary pain unit's group pain education sessions from February-August 2020. Of the 23 we could reach, 10 completed semi-structured telephone interviews. <b>Data Analysis:</b> Audio-recordings were transcribed verbatim and subject to thematic content analysis. <b>Results:</b> 'Attendance barriers' themes highlighted the complex lives of non-attendees. Pain prevented them from leaving their house, deterred them from travel to, and sitting through, the entire session. Competing responsibilities including other medical appointments and comorbidities were commonly mentioned. Most explicitly stated their dislike for the group format. Other factors included fear of the unknown nature of the session, not wanting education, and wanting a doctor's appointment. Several participants expressed a distrust of medical professionals, and perceived the benefits of attending as not exceeding the perceived time, money and pain associated. <b>Conclusions:</b> Pain management may not be individuals' main priority and attendance may only occur when other personal issues are addressed. Significant non-attendance rates may be unavoidable. Providing additional session detail may reduce misconceptions and allay concerns. Educating referring GPs may assist consumers to make an informed decision regarding attending. Online sessions may address various barriers and prove a more cost-effective alternative.</p><p><strong>Perspective: </strong>This article examines consumers' reasons for non-attendance at pre-clinic group education programs. Findings could be used by Pain Units to shape patient and GP communications regarding such programs, as well as program content and format, to improve patient acceptance and program attendance, and potentially engagement with self-management.</p>","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"20494637251322977"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11851594/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20494637251322977","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many pain clinics encourage/mandate attendance at introductory group pain education sessions. Despite high non-attendance rates, no studies have examined consumer-reported reasons for non-attendance. Purpose: The aim of this study was to better understand why consumers fail to attend their pain education session. Research Design and Study Sample: We attempted to contact all non-attendees of our South Australian tertiary pain unit's group pain education sessions from February-August 2020. Of the 23 we could reach, 10 completed semi-structured telephone interviews. Data Analysis: Audio-recordings were transcribed verbatim and subject to thematic content analysis. Results: 'Attendance barriers' themes highlighted the complex lives of non-attendees. Pain prevented them from leaving their house, deterred them from travel to, and sitting through, the entire session. Competing responsibilities including other medical appointments and comorbidities were commonly mentioned. Most explicitly stated their dislike for the group format. Other factors included fear of the unknown nature of the session, not wanting education, and wanting a doctor's appointment. Several participants expressed a distrust of medical professionals, and perceived the benefits of attending as not exceeding the perceived time, money and pain associated. Conclusions: Pain management may not be individuals' main priority and attendance may only occur when other personal issues are addressed. Significant non-attendance rates may be unavoidable. Providing additional session detail may reduce misconceptions and allay concerns. Educating referring GPs may assist consumers to make an informed decision regarding attending. Online sessions may address various barriers and prove a more cost-effective alternative.

Perspective: This article examines consumers' reasons for non-attendance at pre-clinic group education programs. Findings could be used by Pain Units to shape patient and GP communications regarding such programs, as well as program content and format, to improve patient acceptance and program attendance, and potentially engagement with self-management.

“我想知道它是否值得我参加”:对消费者决定不参加慢性疼痛小组教育课程的定性分析。
背景:许多疼痛诊所鼓励/强制参加介绍性小组疼痛教育会议。尽管缺勤率很高,但没有研究调查消费者报告的缺勤原因。目的:本研究的目的是为了更好地了解为什么消费者不参加他们的疼痛教育会议。研究设计和研究样本:我们试图联系2020年2月至8月期间南澳大利亚三级疼痛单位集体疼痛教育会议的所有非参与者。在我们能联系到的23人中,有10人完成了半结构化的电话采访。资料分析:录音资料逐字抄录,并进行专题内容分析。结果:“出席障碍”的主题突出了非出席者的复杂生活。疼痛使他们无法离开自己的房子,阻止他们去参加整个疗程,也阻止他们坐下来完成整个疗程。包括其他医疗预约和合并症在内的相互竞争的责任被普遍提及。大多数人明确表示不喜欢分组形式。其他因素还包括对治疗的未知性质的恐惧,不想接受教育,以及想要预约医生。一些参与者表示不信任医疗专业人员,认为就诊的好处不会超过所认为的与之相关的时间、金钱和痛苦。结论:疼痛管理可能不是个人的主要优先事项,只有当其他个人问题得到解决时才会出现。显著的缺勤率可能是不可避免的。提供额外的会议细节可以减少误解和减轻关注。教育推荐全科医生可以帮助消费者做出明智的决定是否参加。在线课程可以解决各种障碍,并证明是一种更具成本效益的选择。观点:本文探讨消费者不参加诊所前团体教育计划的原因。研究结果可以被疼痛单位用来塑造患者和全科医生关于这些项目的沟通,以及项目的内容和格式,以提高患者的接受度和项目出勤率,并潜在地参与自我管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Pain
British Journal of Pain CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: British Journal of Pain is a peer-reviewed quarterly British journal with an international multidisciplinary Editorial Board. The journal publishes original research and reviews on all major aspects of pain and pain management. Reviews reflect the body of evidence of the topic and are suitable for a multidisciplinary readership. Where empirical evidence is lacking, the reviews reflect the generally held opinions of experts in the field. The Journal has broadened its scope and has become a forum for publishing primary research together with brief reports related to pain and pain interventions. Submissions from all over the world have been published and are welcome. Official journal of the British Pain Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信