Hemilaminectomy vs. laminectomy for spinal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Gabriel Teles de Oliveira Piñeiro, Marcos Paulo Rodrigues de Oliveira, Pedro Henrique Ferreira Sandes, Davi Chaves Rocha de Souza, Caio Passos de Azevedo Figueiredo Trocoli, Gabriel Souza Medrado-Nunes, Vinícius Monteiro de Paula Guirado, Roger Schmidt Brock, Danilo Gomes Quadros
{"title":"Hemilaminectomy vs. laminectomy for spinal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Gabriel Teles de Oliveira Piñeiro, Marcos Paulo Rodrigues de Oliveira, Pedro Henrique Ferreira Sandes, Davi Chaves Rocha de Souza, Caio Passos de Azevedo Figueiredo Trocoli, Gabriel Souza Medrado-Nunes, Vinícius Monteiro de Paula Guirado, Roger Schmidt Brock, Danilo Gomes Quadros","doi":"10.1007/s10143-025-03435-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hemilaminectomy is a less invasive surgical option than laminectomy for spinal tumors, but which method provides better results remains to be determined. Thus, we aimed to perform a meta-analysis comparing outcomes between the two approaches. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science for studies comparing hemilaminectomy to laminectomy in patients who underwent spinal tumor resection until August 2024. The outcomes were total resection rate, neurological deterioration, postoperative complications, length of stay, operative time, and estimated blood loss. Statistical analysis was performed via R software (version 4.4.1). Heterogeneity was assessed with I<sup>2</sup> statistics. We included 12 studies with 1047 patients, of whom 405 (38.7%) underwent hemilaminectomy. The mean age was 56.6 ± 7.5 years. The mean follow-up ranged from 1 to 60 months. Among the tumors, 44.8% were meningiomas, and 57.4% were located in the thoracic spine. With no significant difference between hemilaminectomy and laminectomy in terms of the total resection rate achieved (RR 1.04, 95% CI: 0.98-1.11, I<sup>2</sup> = 38%), hemilaminectomy showed lower neurological deterioration (RR 0.53, 95% CI: 0.35-0.81, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) and postoperative complications (RR 0.58, 95% CI: 0.39-0.86, I<sup>2</sup> = 12%). Furthermore, the length of stay (MD -2.91 days, 95% CI: -4.98 to -0.85; I<sup>2</sup> = 90%), operative time (MD -26.44 min, 95% CI: -46.22 to -6.67; I<sup>2</sup> = 61%), and estimated blood loss (MD -115.64 mL, 95% CI: -175.68 to -55.60; I<sup>2</sup> = 78%) were significantly lower in hemilaminectomy. Hemilaminectomy is associated with lower neurological deterioration, postoperative complications, operation time, length of stay, and estimated blood loss. Therefore, our results might suggest that hemilaminectomy may be a more promising and preferable alternative to laminectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"270"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03435-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hemilaminectomy is a less invasive surgical option than laminectomy for spinal tumors, but which method provides better results remains to be determined. Thus, we aimed to perform a meta-analysis comparing outcomes between the two approaches. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science for studies comparing hemilaminectomy to laminectomy in patients who underwent spinal tumor resection until August 2024. The outcomes were total resection rate, neurological deterioration, postoperative complications, length of stay, operative time, and estimated blood loss. Statistical analysis was performed via R software (version 4.4.1). Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics. We included 12 studies with 1047 patients, of whom 405 (38.7%) underwent hemilaminectomy. The mean age was 56.6 ± 7.5 years. The mean follow-up ranged from 1 to 60 months. Among the tumors, 44.8% were meningiomas, and 57.4% were located in the thoracic spine. With no significant difference between hemilaminectomy and laminectomy in terms of the total resection rate achieved (RR 1.04, 95% CI: 0.98-1.11, I2 = 38%), hemilaminectomy showed lower neurological deterioration (RR 0.53, 95% CI: 0.35-0.81, I2 = 0%) and postoperative complications (RR 0.58, 95% CI: 0.39-0.86, I2 = 12%). Furthermore, the length of stay (MD -2.91 days, 95% CI: -4.98 to -0.85; I2 = 90%), operative time (MD -26.44 min, 95% CI: -46.22 to -6.67; I2 = 61%), and estimated blood loss (MD -115.64 mL, 95% CI: -175.68 to -55.60; I2 = 78%) were significantly lower in hemilaminectomy. Hemilaminectomy is associated with lower neurological deterioration, postoperative complications, operation time, length of stay, and estimated blood loss. Therefore, our results might suggest that hemilaminectomy may be a more promising and preferable alternative to laminectomy.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信