A novel technique of intraoperative infiltration between posterior capsule and popliteal artery can reduce opioid consumption and blood loss in total knee arthroplasty surgery: an age- and gender-matched study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Hsuan-Hsiao Ma, Shun-An Kan, Fang-Yao Chiu, Yu-Ping Su
{"title":"A novel technique of intraoperative infiltration between posterior capsule and popliteal artery can reduce opioid consumption and blood loss in total knee arthroplasty surgery: an age- and gender-matched study.","authors":"Hsuan-Hsiao Ma, Shun-An Kan, Fang-Yao Chiu, Yu-Ping Su","doi":"10.1186/s13018-025-05605-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Interspace infiltration between the posterior knee capsule and popliteal artery (iPACK) is an effective method for pain control following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, this procedure still requires an experienced physician to perform ultrasound-guided injections postoperatively, and the patient will need to undergo additional injections aside from the surgery. This study investigates a novel, simplified intraoperative iPACK (I-iPACK) technique, applied during surgery without the need for ultrasound or an anesthesiologist. We hypothesized that combining I-iPACK with periarticular injection (PAI), comparing with using PAI alone, could reduce postoperative morphine consumption and improve the range of motion (ROM) in patients after TKA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis reviewed data from 600 patients who underwent unilateral TKA, selected from an initial pool of 3502. The patients were divided into two groups: 300 received PAI with I-iPACK (Group A), and 300 received PAI alone (Group B). The groups were matched by age and gender. The primary outcome parameters postoperative pain levels (VAS scores) and cumulative morphine consumption at 24, 48, and 72 h. The secondary outcome parameters were maximum tolerated ROM measured by continuous passive motion (CPM) through time and adverse events, such as nausea, dizziness, constipation, and gastrointestinal bleeding, monitored for two weeks post-surgery. The hypothesis is the additional I-iPACK technique is not inferior to the PAI alone. Non-parametric statistical methods were used for analysis, with a significance threshold set at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups were comparable in demographics, and no significant differences in surgery time were noted. However, the I-iPACK group had significantly less blood loss. Patients receiving I-iPACK had improved ROM at 24 h, reduced morphine consumption at all measured time points, and had lower rates of complications including constipation and dizziness. The two groups showed no significant differences in other complications or pain scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The addition of I-iPACK to PAI during TKA surgery effectively reduces morphine consumption, limits blood loss, and enhances early postoperative ROM without increasing adverse events such as nerve palsy. Similar technique of intra-operative infiltration for pain control could be adopted in diverse surgical settings. However, the lack of blinding might have minor impacts on the patient-reported outcome such as VAS scores.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, Therapeutic Study.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"205"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11866612/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05605-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Interspace infiltration between the posterior knee capsule and popliteal artery (iPACK) is an effective method for pain control following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, this procedure still requires an experienced physician to perform ultrasound-guided injections postoperatively, and the patient will need to undergo additional injections aside from the surgery. This study investigates a novel, simplified intraoperative iPACK (I-iPACK) technique, applied during surgery without the need for ultrasound or an anesthesiologist. We hypothesized that combining I-iPACK with periarticular injection (PAI), comparing with using PAI alone, could reduce postoperative morphine consumption and improve the range of motion (ROM) in patients after TKA.

Methods: This retrospective analysis reviewed data from 600 patients who underwent unilateral TKA, selected from an initial pool of 3502. The patients were divided into two groups: 300 received PAI with I-iPACK (Group A), and 300 received PAI alone (Group B). The groups were matched by age and gender. The primary outcome parameters postoperative pain levels (VAS scores) and cumulative morphine consumption at 24, 48, and 72 h. The secondary outcome parameters were maximum tolerated ROM measured by continuous passive motion (CPM) through time and adverse events, such as nausea, dizziness, constipation, and gastrointestinal bleeding, monitored for two weeks post-surgery. The hypothesis is the additional I-iPACK technique is not inferior to the PAI alone. Non-parametric statistical methods were used for analysis, with a significance threshold set at p < 0.05.

Results: Both groups were comparable in demographics, and no significant differences in surgery time were noted. However, the I-iPACK group had significantly less blood loss. Patients receiving I-iPACK had improved ROM at 24 h, reduced morphine consumption at all measured time points, and had lower rates of complications including constipation and dizziness. The two groups showed no significant differences in other complications or pain scores.

Conclusion: The addition of I-iPACK to PAI during TKA surgery effectively reduces morphine consumption, limits blood loss, and enhances early postoperative ROM without increasing adverse events such as nerve palsy. Similar technique of intra-operative infiltration for pain control could be adopted in diverse surgical settings. However, the lack of blinding might have minor impacts on the patient-reported outcome such as VAS scores.

Level of evidence: Level III, Therapeutic Study.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信