Outcomes and experiences of genetic testing in children with congenital heart disease.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Ansley M Morrish, Bridget R O'Malley, Desiree C K Hilton, Annabel E Webb, Bruce Bennetts, Gary F Sholler, Janine Smith, Gillian M Blue
{"title":"Outcomes and experiences of genetic testing in children with congenital heart disease.","authors":"Ansley M Morrish, Bridget R O'Malley, Desiree C K Hilton, Annabel E Webb, Bruce Bennetts, Gary F Sholler, Janine Smith, Gillian M Blue","doi":"10.1136/jmg-2024-110553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Following genomic advances, genetic testing options for paediatric patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) have evolved significantly. A single-site audit was conducted to assess testing outcomes and a survey created to explore family experiences and preferences.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>All genetic tests ordered in postcardiac surgery patients with CHD at The Children's Hospital at Westmead between January 2017 and December 2021 were reviewed. Diagnostic yield, clinical and demographic factors, and testing trends over time were evaluated. Surveys were sent to parents of children who had met a clinical geneticist (n=112).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Genetic testing was completed in 607 individuals (74 molecular testing; 533 cytogenetic testing only). The diagnostic rate was 36% and 9%, respectively. Use of molecular testing significantly increased over time (p=0.033), but yield did not (p=0.288). Molecular testing yield was high in neonates (64%), and patients with extracardiac anomalies (40%) or relevant family history (40%). Brain (p=0.022), haematological/cancer (p≤0.001), immune (p≤0.001), endocrine (p≤0.001) anomalies and intellectual disability (p=0.027) were associated with a diagnosis following cytogenetic testing. Short stature was significantly associated with diagnostic yield following molecular testing (p=0.012). Survey respondents (n=28) reported a positive experience (p=0.013) with minimal decisional regret (p=0.322).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cytogenetic testing remains an important first-tier test in CHD. Furthermore, molecular testing guided by a clinical geneticist generates a high rate of genetic diagnoses. Parents of children with CHD value genetic testing with little regret.</p>","PeriodicalId":16237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Genetics","volume":" ","pages":"335-344"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg-2024-110553","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Following genomic advances, genetic testing options for paediatric patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) have evolved significantly. A single-site audit was conducted to assess testing outcomes and a survey created to explore family experiences and preferences.

Method: All genetic tests ordered in postcardiac surgery patients with CHD at The Children's Hospital at Westmead between January 2017 and December 2021 were reviewed. Diagnostic yield, clinical and demographic factors, and testing trends over time were evaluated. Surveys were sent to parents of children who had met a clinical geneticist (n=112).

Results: Genetic testing was completed in 607 individuals (74 molecular testing; 533 cytogenetic testing only). The diagnostic rate was 36% and 9%, respectively. Use of molecular testing significantly increased over time (p=0.033), but yield did not (p=0.288). Molecular testing yield was high in neonates (64%), and patients with extracardiac anomalies (40%) or relevant family history (40%). Brain (p=0.022), haematological/cancer (p≤0.001), immune (p≤0.001), endocrine (p≤0.001) anomalies and intellectual disability (p=0.027) were associated with a diagnosis following cytogenetic testing. Short stature was significantly associated with diagnostic yield following molecular testing (p=0.012). Survey respondents (n=28) reported a positive experience (p=0.013) with minimal decisional regret (p=0.322).

Conclusion: Cytogenetic testing remains an important first-tier test in CHD. Furthermore, molecular testing guided by a clinical geneticist generates a high rate of genetic diagnoses. Parents of children with CHD value genetic testing with little regret.

先天性心脏病患儿基因检测的结果和经验。
背景:随着基因组学的进步,先天性心脏病(CHD)患儿的基因检测选择有了显著的发展。我们进行了一次单点审核,以评估测试结果,并开展了一项调查,以探索家庭经验和偏好。方法:回顾2017年1月至2021年12月在韦斯特米德儿童医院(Children Hospital at Westmead)进行心脏手术后冠心病患者的所有基因检测。评估了诊断率、临床和人口因素以及随时间推移的检测趋势。调查发给了见过临床遗传学家的孩子的父母(n=112)。结果:完成基因检测607例(分子检测74例;533细胞遗传学检测)。诊断率分别为36%和9%。随着时间的推移,分子检测的使用显著增加(p=0.033),但产量没有增加(p=0.288)。新生儿(64%)、心外异常患者(40%)或相关家族史患者(40%)的分子检测率较高。脑(p=0.022)、血液学/癌症(p≤0.001)、免疫(p≤0.001)、内分泌(p≤0.001)异常和智力残疾(p=0.027)与细胞遗传学检测后的诊断相关。矮小身材与分子检测后的诊断率显著相关(p=0.012)。调查对象(n=28)报告了积极的经历(p=0.013)和最小的决策后悔(p=0.322)。结论:细胞遗传学检测仍是冠心病重要的一线检测方法。此外,由临床遗传学家指导的分子检测产生了很高的遗传诊断率。患有冠心病的孩子的父母很少后悔重视基因检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Genetics
Journal of Medical Genetics 医学-遗传学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.50%
发文量
92
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Genetics is a leading international peer-reviewed journal covering original research in human genetics, including reviews of and opinion on the latest developments. Articles cover the molecular basis of human disease including germline cancer genetics, clinical manifestations of genetic disorders, applications of molecular genetics to medical practice and the systematic evaluation of such applications worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信