{"title":"Balance, Gait and Foot Pressure Distribution in Neuropathic Pain Associated with Lumbar Disc Degeneration.","authors":"Suleyman Korkusuz, Büsra Seckinogullari Korkusuz, Zeliha Ozlem Yuruk, Sibel Kibar, Ferdi Yavuz","doi":"10.7547/24-138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effects of NP associated with LDD on balance, gait and foot pressure distribution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective controlled study was conducted on 42 individuals aged between 40-70 years. There were 3 groups in the study: individuals diagnosed with NP associated with LDD (n=14), individuals with LDD without NP (n=14), and the control group (n=14). The Force Plate system and Core Balance System measured static and dynamic postural balance and stability limits. Gait and dynamic plantar pressure distribution analyses were performed with a computerized gait evaluation system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Signs and Symptoms (LANSS), VAS during gait, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were higher in LDD with NP group than in LDD without NP group (p<0.05). It was found that LDD with NP group had backward dynamic balance control (p<0.05). There was no significant difference in balance control, dynamic plantar pressure distribution, and spatiotemporal gait parameters between the groups (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although participants with NP had higher levels of pain severity in gait and disability, there was no difference in postural balance, dynamic plantar pressure distribution, and spatiotemporal gait parameters compared to participants with LDD without NP and healthy individuals. All participants with LDD were unilaterally affected. Therefore, postural balance and gait tasks would be able to compensate for the unaffected limb.</p>","PeriodicalId":17241,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"1-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7547/24-138","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of NP associated with LDD on balance, gait and foot pressure distribution.
Methods: This prospective controlled study was conducted on 42 individuals aged between 40-70 years. There were 3 groups in the study: individuals diagnosed with NP associated with LDD (n=14), individuals with LDD without NP (n=14), and the control group (n=14). The Force Plate system and Core Balance System measured static and dynamic postural balance and stability limits. Gait and dynamic plantar pressure distribution analyses were performed with a computerized gait evaluation system.
Results: The Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Signs and Symptoms (LANSS), VAS during gait, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were higher in LDD with NP group than in LDD without NP group (p<0.05). It was found that LDD with NP group had backward dynamic balance control (p<0.05). There was no significant difference in balance control, dynamic plantar pressure distribution, and spatiotemporal gait parameters between the groups (p>0.05).
Conclusion: Although participants with NP had higher levels of pain severity in gait and disability, there was no difference in postural balance, dynamic plantar pressure distribution, and spatiotemporal gait parameters compared to participants with LDD without NP and healthy individuals. All participants with LDD were unilaterally affected. Therefore, postural balance and gait tasks would be able to compensate for the unaffected limb.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, the official journal of the Association, is the oldest and most frequently cited peer-reviewed journal in the profession of foot and ankle medicine. Founded in 1907 and appearing 6 times per year, it publishes research studies, case reports, literature reviews, special communications, clinical correspondence, letters to the editor, book reviews, and various other types of submissions. The Journal is included in major indexing and abstracting services for biomedical literature.