Epidemiology and Visual Outcome of Pediatric Ocular Trauma in a Major Tertiary Eye Center in Tunisia: A 6-Year Retrospective Study.

IF 1.2 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Journal of Current Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-01-18 eCollection Date: 2024-04-01 DOI:10.4103/joco.joco_293_23
Mohamed Foued Rmili, Ahmed Chebil, Rim Limaiem, Nibrass Chaker, Rym Bouraoui, Yousra Falfoul, Leila El Matri
{"title":"Epidemiology and Visual Outcome of Pediatric Ocular Trauma in a Major Tertiary Eye Center in Tunisia: A 6-Year Retrospective Study.","authors":"Mohamed Foued Rmili, Ahmed Chebil, Rim Limaiem, Nibrass Chaker, Rym Bouraoui, Yousra Falfoul, Leila El Matri","doi":"10.4103/joco.joco_293_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe the epidemiological profile, clinical characteristics, and visual outcome of pediatric ocular trauma in Tunisia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, we reviewed the charts of 398 children younger than 16 years of age, presenting to the Emergency Department \"B\" of Hedi Rais Institute of Ophthalmology, for ocular trauma. The study period was between January 1, 2013, and January 1, 2019. The final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was measured at the end of the follow-up period, which was 6 months. We used the Chi-squared test to compare the two groups of final visual acuities (good vs. poor visual outcome) for different prognostic factors. The ocular trauma score (OTS) and the pediatric OTS (POTS) were calculated for each child. We used the Cohen's kappa coefficient to evaluate the agreement between our final visual acuities using OTS and POTS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 7.95 years with a sex ratio (males to females) of 5.32. Closed-globe injury (CGI) was found in 321 eyes, while 101 eyes had open-globe injury (OGI). Injuries were bilateral in 24 children. The majority of injuries occurred at home. The predominant mechanism of injury was fall in CGI and tree branch in OGI. Initial and final BCVA were predominantly ≤0.3 logMAR in both CGI and OGI. OTS category 3 and POTS category 2 were the most common. Factors associated with poor prognosis included delay to consultation >24 h (<i>P</i> = 0.0001); initial BCVA >1 logMAR (<i>P</i> = 0.0001); OGI (<i>P</i> = 0.001); size of injury ≥5 mm (<i>P</i> = 0.01); zone III in OGI (<i>P</i> = 0.032); endophthalmitis (<i>P</i> = 0.001); OTS 1 and 2 (<i>P</i> = 0.01); POTS 1 (<i>P</i> = 0.0001); and the following associated lesions: cataract (<i>P</i> = 0.006), retinal detachment (<i>P</i> = 0.03), and intraocular foreign body (<i>P</i> = 0.03). We found that both OTS (<i>P</i> = 0.001) and POTS (<i>P</i> = 0.003) were predictive of the final BCVA, with a moderate agreement between them (Cohen's kappa = 0.56).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Studying the epidemiological profile and identifying the risk factors for poor visual outcome of pediatric ocular trauma are necessary to implement preventive measures. A thorough clinical evaluation and close patient follow-up are crucial for identifying these risk factors. Both OTS and POTS were predictive of the final visual outcome. POTS has the advantage of bypassing the initial visual acuity which may be difficult to assess in children.</p>","PeriodicalId":15423,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current Ophthalmology","volume":"36 2","pages":"182-189"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11856116/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joco.joco_293_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To describe the epidemiological profile, clinical characteristics, and visual outcome of pediatric ocular trauma in Tunisia.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we reviewed the charts of 398 children younger than 16 years of age, presenting to the Emergency Department "B" of Hedi Rais Institute of Ophthalmology, for ocular trauma. The study period was between January 1, 2013, and January 1, 2019. The final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was measured at the end of the follow-up period, which was 6 months. We used the Chi-squared test to compare the two groups of final visual acuities (good vs. poor visual outcome) for different prognostic factors. The ocular trauma score (OTS) and the pediatric OTS (POTS) were calculated for each child. We used the Cohen's kappa coefficient to evaluate the agreement between our final visual acuities using OTS and POTS.

Results: The mean age was 7.95 years with a sex ratio (males to females) of 5.32. Closed-globe injury (CGI) was found in 321 eyes, while 101 eyes had open-globe injury (OGI). Injuries were bilateral in 24 children. The majority of injuries occurred at home. The predominant mechanism of injury was fall in CGI and tree branch in OGI. Initial and final BCVA were predominantly ≤0.3 logMAR in both CGI and OGI. OTS category 3 and POTS category 2 were the most common. Factors associated with poor prognosis included delay to consultation >24 h (P = 0.0001); initial BCVA >1 logMAR (P = 0.0001); OGI (P = 0.001); size of injury ≥5 mm (P = 0.01); zone III in OGI (P = 0.032); endophthalmitis (P = 0.001); OTS 1 and 2 (P = 0.01); POTS 1 (P = 0.0001); and the following associated lesions: cataract (P = 0.006), retinal detachment (P = 0.03), and intraocular foreign body (P = 0.03). We found that both OTS (P = 0.001) and POTS (P = 0.003) were predictive of the final BCVA, with a moderate agreement between them (Cohen's kappa = 0.56).

Conclusions: Studying the epidemiological profile and identifying the risk factors for poor visual outcome of pediatric ocular trauma are necessary to implement preventive measures. A thorough clinical evaluation and close patient follow-up are crucial for identifying these risk factors. Both OTS and POTS were predictive of the final visual outcome. POTS has the advantage of bypassing the initial visual acuity which may be difficult to assess in children.

流行病学和视觉结果的儿童眼外伤在主要三级眼科中心在突尼斯:6年的回顾性研究。
目的:描述突尼斯儿童眼外伤的流行病学概况、临床特征和视力结果。方法:在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们回顾了398例16岁以下儿童的图表,这些儿童在Hedi Rais眼科研究所急诊科B部就诊。研究期间为2013年1月1日至2019年1月1日。随访6个月后测量最终最佳矫正视力(BCVA)。我们使用卡方检验来比较两组不同预后因素的最终视力(好与差的视力结果)。计算每个儿童的眼外伤评分(OTS)和儿童OTS (POTS)。我们使用Cohen’s kappa系数来评估使用OTS和POTS的最终视力之间的一致性。结果:平均年龄7.95岁,男女性别比5.32。闭球损伤(CGI) 321眼,开球损伤(OGI) 101眼。24例患儿双侧受伤。大多数伤害发生在家中。CGI的主要损伤机制是坠落,OGI的主要损伤机制是树枝。在CGI和OGI中,初始和最终BCVA主要≤0.3 logMAR。OTS第3类和POTS第2类最常见。与预后不良相关的因素包括:就诊延误24小时(P = 0.0001);初始BCVA >1 logMAR (P = 0.0001);Ogi (p = 0.001);损伤大小≥5 mm (P = 0.01);OGI为III区(P = 0.032);眼内炎(P = 0.001);OTS 1、2 (P = 0.01);POTS 1 (p = 0.0001);相关病变:白内障(P = 0.006)、视网膜脱离(P = 0.03)、眼内异物(P = 0.03)。我们发现OTS (P = 0.001)和POTS (P = 0.003)都能预测最终的BCVA,两者之间有中等程度的一致性(Cohen’s kappa = 0.56)。结论:研究儿童眼外伤视力不良的流行病学概况,明确其危险因素,是实施预防措施的必要措施。彻底的临床评估和密切的患者随访对于确定这些危险因素至关重要。OTS和POTS均可预测最终的视觉结果。POTS的优点是可以绕过儿童难以评估的初始视力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
45
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Peer Review under the responsibility of Iranian Society of Ophthalmology Journal of Current Ophthalmology, the official publication of the Iranian Society of Ophthalmology, is a peer-reviewed, open-access, scientific journal that welcomes high quality original articles related to vision science and all fields of ophthalmology. Journal of Current Ophthalmology is the continuum of Iranian Journal of Ophthalmology published since 1969.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信