Sex differences in the physiological and perceptual responses to face masks during exercise.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 PHYSIOLOGY
O N Ferguson, M R Flynn, R A Mitchell, A S Hind, J I Arnold, S S Dhillon, P B Dominelli, Y Molgat-Seon, Jordan A Guenette
{"title":"Sex differences in the physiological and perceptual responses to face masks during exercise.","authors":"O N Ferguson, M R Flynn, R A Mitchell, A S Hind, J I Arnold, S S Dhillon, P B Dominelli, Y Molgat-Seon, Jordan A Guenette","doi":"10.1152/japplphysiol.00679.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite consistent evidence that face masks (FMs) increase dyspnea during exercise, few studies have examined the sex differences in the physiological and perceptual responses to FMs. In a randomized, cross-over design, 32 healthy individuals (16 female;23±3yr) completed incremental cycling tests on two visits with either no mask or a surgical FM. Dyspnea intensity and unpleasantness were assessed using the 0-10 category-ratio Borg scale. Diaphragmatic electromyography, esophageal pressure (P<sub>eso</sub>), and transdiaphragmatic pressure (P<sub>di</sub>) were measured using a nasogastric catheter to estimate neural inspiratory drive and respiratory muscle effort. Surface EMG was measured on the sternocleidomastoid and scalene muscles. FMs resulted in a steeper increase in dyspnea unpleasantness in males compared to females across the 0-100% work rate (estimate=1.47CR10, <i>P</i>=0.005), with no significant difference in the effect of the FM on dyspnea intensity between sexes (<i>P</i>>0.05). Males had a greater increase in P<sub>eso</sub> and P<sub>di</sub> with FMs compared to females across work rate (3.77cmH<sub>2</sub>O,<i>P</i>=0.009;4.74cmH<sub>2</sub>O,<i>P</i>=0.011, respectively) and a greater increase in sternocleidomastoid activation from 40-60% WR (all <i>P<</i>0.05). Additionally, moisture accumulation pre- vs. post-exercise (<i>P</i>=0.01) was significantly greater in males compared to females. FMs resulted in a similar absolute reduction in exercise time in both sexes although it was only statistically significant in females (<i>P</i>=0.006). This study highlights that males likely experience greater dyspnea unpleasantness with FMs due to higher flows and ventilations, which increase mask resistance and, combined with greater moisture accumulation, elevate respiratory muscle effort and accessory muscle activation. Nonetheless, the absolute impact on exercise duration appears similar between sexes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00679.2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite consistent evidence that face masks (FMs) increase dyspnea during exercise, few studies have examined the sex differences in the physiological and perceptual responses to FMs. In a randomized, cross-over design, 32 healthy individuals (16 female;23±3yr) completed incremental cycling tests on two visits with either no mask or a surgical FM. Dyspnea intensity and unpleasantness were assessed using the 0-10 category-ratio Borg scale. Diaphragmatic electromyography, esophageal pressure (Peso), and transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi) were measured using a nasogastric catheter to estimate neural inspiratory drive and respiratory muscle effort. Surface EMG was measured on the sternocleidomastoid and scalene muscles. FMs resulted in a steeper increase in dyspnea unpleasantness in males compared to females across the 0-100% work rate (estimate=1.47CR10, P=0.005), with no significant difference in the effect of the FM on dyspnea intensity between sexes (P>0.05). Males had a greater increase in Peso and Pdi with FMs compared to females across work rate (3.77cmH2O,P=0.009;4.74cmH2O,P=0.011, respectively) and a greater increase in sternocleidomastoid activation from 40-60% WR (all P<0.05). Additionally, moisture accumulation pre- vs. post-exercise (P=0.01) was significantly greater in males compared to females. FMs resulted in a similar absolute reduction in exercise time in both sexes although it was only statistically significant in females (P=0.006). This study highlights that males likely experience greater dyspnea unpleasantness with FMs due to higher flows and ventilations, which increase mask resistance and, combined with greater moisture accumulation, elevate respiratory muscle effort and accessory muscle activation. Nonetheless, the absolute impact on exercise duration appears similar between sexes.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Physiology publishes the highest quality original research and reviews that examine novel adaptive and integrative physiological mechanisms in humans and animals that advance the field. The journal encourages the submission of manuscripts that examine the acute and adaptive responses of various organs, tissues, cells and/or molecular pathways to environmental, physiological and/or pathophysiological stressors. As an applied physiology journal, topics of interest are not limited to a particular organ system. The journal, therefore, considers a wide array of integrative and translational research topics examining the mechanisms involved in disease processes and mitigation strategies, as well as the promotion of health and well-being throughout the lifespan. Priority is given to manuscripts that provide mechanistic insight deemed to exert an impact on the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信