Lauren M Colenso-Semple, James McKendry, Changhyun Lim, Philip J Atherton, Daniel J Wilkinson, K Smith, Stuart M Phillips
{"title":"Oral contraceptive pill phase does not influence muscle protein synthesis or myofibrillar proteolysis at rest or in response to resistance exercise.","authors":"Lauren M Colenso-Semple, James McKendry, Changhyun Lim, Philip J Atherton, Daniel J Wilkinson, K Smith, Stuart M Phillips","doi":"10.1152/japplphysiol.00035.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is speculation that oral contraceptive pill (OCP) use affects skeletal muscle biology and protein turnover in response to resistance exercise; however, research in this area is scarce. We aimed to assess, using stable isotope tracers and skeletal muscle biopsies, how second-generation OCP phase affected muscle protein synthesis and whole-body proteolysis. Participants (n=12) completed two 6-day study phases in a randomized order: an active pill phase (Active; week two of a monthly active OCP cycle) and an inactive pill phase (Inactive; final week of a monthly OCP cycle). Participants performed unilateral resistance exercise in each study phase, exercising the contralateral leg in the opposite phase in a randomized, counterbalanced order. The Active phase myofibrillar protein synthesis (MPS) rates were 1.44 ± 0.14 %•d<sup>-1</sup> in the control leg and 1.64 ± 0.15 %•d<sup>-1</sup> in the exercise leg (p < 0.001). The Inactive phase MPS rates were 1.49 ± 0.12 %•d-1 %/d in the control leg and 1.71 ± 0.16 %•d<sup>-1</sup> in the exercise leg (p < 0.001), with no interaction between phases (p = 0.63). There was no significant effect of OCP phase on whole-body myofibrillar proteolytic rate (active phase <i>k</i> = 0.018 ± 0.01; inactive phase <i>k</i> = 0.018 ± 0.006; p = 0.55). Skeletal muscle remains equally as responsive, in terms of stimulation of MPS, during Active and Inactive OCP phases; hence, our data does not support a pro-anabolic or catabolic, based on myofibrillar proteolysis, effect of OCP phase on skeletal muscle in females.</p>","PeriodicalId":15160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00035.2025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
There is speculation that oral contraceptive pill (OCP) use affects skeletal muscle biology and protein turnover in response to resistance exercise; however, research in this area is scarce. We aimed to assess, using stable isotope tracers and skeletal muscle biopsies, how second-generation OCP phase affected muscle protein synthesis and whole-body proteolysis. Participants (n=12) completed two 6-day study phases in a randomized order: an active pill phase (Active; week two of a monthly active OCP cycle) and an inactive pill phase (Inactive; final week of a monthly OCP cycle). Participants performed unilateral resistance exercise in each study phase, exercising the contralateral leg in the opposite phase in a randomized, counterbalanced order. The Active phase myofibrillar protein synthesis (MPS) rates were 1.44 ± 0.14 %•d-1 in the control leg and 1.64 ± 0.15 %•d-1 in the exercise leg (p < 0.001). The Inactive phase MPS rates were 1.49 ± 0.12 %•d-1 %/d in the control leg and 1.71 ± 0.16 %•d-1 in the exercise leg (p < 0.001), with no interaction between phases (p = 0.63). There was no significant effect of OCP phase on whole-body myofibrillar proteolytic rate (active phase k = 0.018 ± 0.01; inactive phase k = 0.018 ± 0.006; p = 0.55). Skeletal muscle remains equally as responsive, in terms of stimulation of MPS, during Active and Inactive OCP phases; hence, our data does not support a pro-anabolic or catabolic, based on myofibrillar proteolysis, effect of OCP phase on skeletal muscle in females.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Applied Physiology publishes the highest quality original research and reviews that examine novel adaptive and integrative physiological mechanisms in humans and animals that advance the field. The journal encourages the submission of manuscripts that examine the acute and adaptive responses of various organs, tissues, cells and/or molecular pathways to environmental, physiological and/or pathophysiological stressors. As an applied physiology journal, topics of interest are not limited to a particular organ system. The journal, therefore, considers a wide array of integrative and translational research topics examining the mechanisms involved in disease processes and mitigation strategies, as well as the promotion of health and well-being throughout the lifespan. Priority is given to manuscripts that provide mechanistic insight deemed to exert an impact on the field.