Online Intervention for Muscle Tension Dysphonia: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Viann N Nguyen-Feng, Patricia A Frazier, Yuchen Liu, Erin Feddema, Benjamin Wils, Elizabeth Nikcevich, Ali Stockness, Kelvin O Lim, Amanda C Hu, Lisa Butcher, Stephanie Misono
{"title":"Online Intervention for Muscle Tension Dysphonia: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Viann N Nguyen-Feng, Patricia A Frazier, Yuchen Liu, Erin Feddema, Benjamin Wils, Elizabeth Nikcevich, Ali Stockness, Kelvin O Lim, Amanda C Hu, Lisa Butcher, Stephanie Misono","doi":"10.1001/jamaoto.2024.5255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Voice-related perceived control is the extent to which a person feels they can control their voice condition and/or their response to it. Given the interaction of psychological factors and voice outcomes, an intervention targeting psychological factors may be a helpful adjunct to clinical voice care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the feasibility, acceptability, and potential efficacy of a perceived control intervention adapted for adult patients with muscle tension dysphonia and to compare its outcomes with those of a voice education program.</p><p><strong>Design, settings, and participants: </strong>This was a pilot randomized clinical trial using mixed methods and including adults with muscle tension dysphonia from academic otolaryngology clinics from July 8, 2018, to December 8, 2019. Participants were randomized to the voice education program or the perceived control intervention, and feasibility and acceptability of both were assessed using quantitative and qualitative measures. Data analyses were performed from October 1, 2023, to March 5, 2024.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Voice-related impairment was measured using the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10). Psychological factors were measured using the voice-related Perceived Present Control Scale, Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI), and Perceived Stress Scale-4. Open-ended participant responses were analyzed following consensual qualitative research methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all, 50 participants (mean [SD] age, 51.0 [15.9] years; 34 women [68%]); 27 were randomly assigned to receive the voice education program and 23 were randomly assigned to the perceived control intervention. Forty participants (80%) completed the study, which demonstrated the feasibility of both options. Outcomes of both the perceived control intervention and the voice education program were acceptable. Change in VHI-10 was heterogeneous, modest overall, and similar in the perceived control (-2.44; 95% CI, -4.25 to -0.63) and education (-2.94; 95% CI, -4.12 to -1.76) arms. Perceived control (secondary outcome) was higher, and exploratory outcomes (ie, somatic concerns, depression, anxiety, and perceived stress) were lower overall between pretest and posttest assessments. Qualitative analyses showed an overall decrease in negative voice-related emotions, fatigue, and negative self-image over the course of the perceived control intervention, and an interest in curated information in the voice education program.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This pilot randomized clinical trial indicates that both the perceived control intervention and voice education program appear promising for further development. Online interventions are of interest to people with voice disorders, and future work may benefit from taking individual differences into account.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03576365.</p>","PeriodicalId":14632,"journal":{"name":"JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11869095/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2024.5255","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Voice-related perceived control is the extent to which a person feels they can control their voice condition and/or their response to it. Given the interaction of psychological factors and voice outcomes, an intervention targeting psychological factors may be a helpful adjunct to clinical voice care.

Objective: To investigate the feasibility, acceptability, and potential efficacy of a perceived control intervention adapted for adult patients with muscle tension dysphonia and to compare its outcomes with those of a voice education program.

Design, settings, and participants: This was a pilot randomized clinical trial using mixed methods and including adults with muscle tension dysphonia from academic otolaryngology clinics from July 8, 2018, to December 8, 2019. Participants were randomized to the voice education program or the perceived control intervention, and feasibility and acceptability of both were assessed using quantitative and qualitative measures. Data analyses were performed from October 1, 2023, to March 5, 2024.

Main outcomes and measures: Voice-related impairment was measured using the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10). Psychological factors were measured using the voice-related Perceived Present Control Scale, Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI), and Perceived Stress Scale-4. Open-ended participant responses were analyzed following consensual qualitative research methods.

Results: In all, 50 participants (mean [SD] age, 51.0 [15.9] years; 34 women [68%]); 27 were randomly assigned to receive the voice education program and 23 were randomly assigned to the perceived control intervention. Forty participants (80%) completed the study, which demonstrated the feasibility of both options. Outcomes of both the perceived control intervention and the voice education program were acceptable. Change in VHI-10 was heterogeneous, modest overall, and similar in the perceived control (-2.44; 95% CI, -4.25 to -0.63) and education (-2.94; 95% CI, -4.12 to -1.76) arms. Perceived control (secondary outcome) was higher, and exploratory outcomes (ie, somatic concerns, depression, anxiety, and perceived stress) were lower overall between pretest and posttest assessments. Qualitative analyses showed an overall decrease in negative voice-related emotions, fatigue, and negative self-image over the course of the perceived control intervention, and an interest in curated information in the voice education program.

Conclusions and relevance: This pilot randomized clinical trial indicates that both the perceived control intervention and voice education program appear promising for further development. Online interventions are of interest to people with voice disorders, and future work may benefit from taking individual differences into account.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03576365.

肌肉紧张性发音障碍的在线干预:一项随机临床试验。
重要性:与声音相关的感知控制是一个人感觉他们可以控制自己的声音状况和/或他们对它的反应的程度。鉴于心理因素与语音结果的相互作用,针对心理因素的干预可能是临床语音护理的有益辅助。目的:探讨一种适用于成年肌张力性语音障碍患者的感知控制干预的可行性、可接受性和潜在疗效,并将其与语音教育计划的结果进行比较。设计、环境和参与者:这是一项采用混合方法的随机临床试验,包括2018年7月8日至2019年12月8日来自耳鼻喉科学术诊所的肌肉紧张性发声障碍的成年人。参与者被随机分配到语音教育计划或感知控制干预中,并使用定量和定性方法评估两者的可行性和可接受性。数据分析时间为2023年10月1日至2024年3月5日。主要结果和测量方法:使用语音障碍指数-10 (VHI-10)测量语音相关损伤。心理因素采用语音相关感知当下控制量表、简短症状量表-18 (BSI)和感知压力量表-4进行测量。开放式参与者的回答分析遵循共识定性研究方法。结果:共有50名参与者(平均[SD]年龄51.0[15.9]岁;34名女性[68%]);27名被随机分配接受语音教育计划,23名被随机分配接受感知控制干预。40名参与者(80%)完成了研究,这证明了两种选择的可行性。感知控制干预和语音教育计划的结果都是可以接受的。VHI-10的变化是异质性的,总体上是适度的,在感知控制中是相似的(-2.44;95% CI, -4.25至-0.63)和教育程度(-2.94;95% CI, -4.12至-1.76)组。感知控制(次要结果)较高,探索性结果(即躯体关注、抑郁、焦虑和感知压力)在测试前和测试后评估之间总体较低。定性分析显示,在感知控制干预的过程中,与声音相关的负面情绪、疲劳和负面自我形象的总体减少,对声音教育计划中精心策划的信息感兴趣。结论和相关性:本试验表明,感知控制干预和语音教育计划都有进一步发展的希望。语音障碍患者对在线干预很感兴趣,考虑到个体差异,未来的工作可能会受益。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03576365。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
230
期刊介绍: JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery is a globally recognized and peer-reviewed medical journal dedicated to providing up-to-date information on diseases affecting the head and neck. It originated in 1925 as Archives of Otolaryngology and currently serves as the official publication for the American Head and Neck Society. As part of the prestigious JAMA Network, a collection of reputable general medical and specialty publications, it ensures the highest standards of research and expertise. Physicians and scientists worldwide rely on JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery for invaluable insights in this specialized field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信