Safety and Feasibility of Outpatient Zolbetuximab Administration in Community Cancer Care: A Mixed-methods Analysis.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
In vivo Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.21873/invivo.13900
Erina Yakuwa, Yuko Shoji, Takashi Oizumi, Yuka Kobayashi, Taichi Motoishi, Takuto Katagiri, Shuhei Suzuki
{"title":"Safety and Feasibility of Outpatient Zolbetuximab Administration in Community Cancer Care: A Mixed-methods Analysis.","authors":"Erina Yakuwa, Yuko Shoji, Takashi Oizumi, Yuka Kobayashi, Taichi Motoishi, Takuto Katagiri, Shuhei Suzuki","doi":"10.21873/invivo.13900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Zolbetuximab, a CLAUDIN18.2-targeted antibody, traditionally requires inpatient administration due to potential adverse events. This study evaluated the safety and feasibility of outpatient administration in a community cancer center setting.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Five patients with CLAUDIN18.2-positive advanced gastric cancer received outpatient zolbetuximab between July and November 2024. We implemented a structured protocol incorporating standardized premedication, hospital-pharmacy collaboration, and comprehensive monitoring. Safety, treatment adherence, economic outcomes, and patient experiences were analyzed using mixed methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No grade 3 or higher adverse events were observed, with mild nausea being the most common toxicity. Treatment adherence was high, with only two patients experiencing non-toxicity-related delays. Outpatient administration reduced costs by approximately 10-15% compared to inpatient administration. Qualitative analysis revealed that while anticipated clinical challenges were effectively managed, practical aspects such as transportation and financial considerations emerged as primary patient concerns. One patient proceeded to conversion surgery, one discontinued due to financial constraints, and three continue treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Outpatient zolbetuximab administration proved safe and feasible in a community setting when implemented with appropriate protocols and support systems. This implementation model could serve as a template for delivering complex cancer therapies in resource-limited settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":13364,"journal":{"name":"In vivo","volume":"39 2","pages":"951-960"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11884467/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In vivo","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13900","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aim: Zolbetuximab, a CLAUDIN18.2-targeted antibody, traditionally requires inpatient administration due to potential adverse events. This study evaluated the safety and feasibility of outpatient administration in a community cancer center setting.

Patients and methods: Five patients with CLAUDIN18.2-positive advanced gastric cancer received outpatient zolbetuximab between July and November 2024. We implemented a structured protocol incorporating standardized premedication, hospital-pharmacy collaboration, and comprehensive monitoring. Safety, treatment adherence, economic outcomes, and patient experiences were analyzed using mixed methods.

Results: No grade 3 or higher adverse events were observed, with mild nausea being the most common toxicity. Treatment adherence was high, with only two patients experiencing non-toxicity-related delays. Outpatient administration reduced costs by approximately 10-15% compared to inpatient administration. Qualitative analysis revealed that while anticipated clinical challenges were effectively managed, practical aspects such as transportation and financial considerations emerged as primary patient concerns. One patient proceeded to conversion surgery, one discontinued due to financial constraints, and three continue treatment.

Conclusion: Outpatient zolbetuximab administration proved safe and feasible in a community setting when implemented with appropriate protocols and support systems. This implementation model could serve as a template for delivering complex cancer therapies in resource-limited settings.

背景/目的:唑贝妥昔单抗是一种CLAUDIN18.2靶向抗体,由于潜在的不良反应,传统上需要住院治疗。本研究评估了在社区癌症中心进行门诊给药的安全性和可行性:5名CLAUDIN18.2阳性晚期胃癌患者在2024年7月至11月期间接受了门诊唑贝妥昔单抗治疗。我们实施了一个结构化方案,其中包括标准化预处理、医院药房合作和全面监测。我们采用混合方法对安全性、治疗依从性、经济效益和患者体验进行了分析:没有观察到 3 级或以上的不良反应,最常见的毒性反应是轻度恶心。治疗依从性很高,仅有两名患者出现了与毒副作用无关的延误。与住院治疗相比,门诊治疗减少了约 10-15% 的费用。定性分析显示,虽然预期的临床挑战得到了有效控制,但交通和经济考虑等实际问题成为患者的主要顾虑。一名患者继续接受转换手术,一名患者因经济拮据而中止治疗,三名患者继续接受治疗:结论:事实证明,在社区环境中使用唑贝妥昔单抗门诊治疗是安全可行的,只需采用适当的方案和支持系统即可。这种实施模式可作为在资源有限的环境中提供复杂癌症疗法的模板。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
In vivo
In vivo 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
330
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: IN VIVO is an international peer-reviewed journal designed to bring together original high quality works and reviews on experimental and clinical biomedical research within the frames of physiology, pathology and disease management. The topics of IN VIVO include: 1. Experimental development and application of new diagnostic and therapeutic procedures; 2. Pharmacological and toxicological evaluation of new drugs, drug combinations and drug delivery systems; 3. Clinical trials; 4. Development and characterization of models of biomedical research; 5. Cancer diagnosis and treatment; 6. Immunotherapy and vaccines; 7. Radiotherapy, Imaging; 8. Tissue engineering, Regenerative medicine; 9. Carcinogenesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信