Cervical Selective Nerve Root Block: Three-dimensional Puncture Planning With Dyna-CT Is Superior to Conventional CT-guidance in an Ex Vivo Model.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
In vivo Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.21873/invivo.13875
Sebastian Schneider, Hans Ulrich Kerl, Miriam Freundt, Katrin E Herrmann, Christoph Groden, Máté E Maros, Sherif A Mohamed
{"title":"Cervical Selective Nerve Root Block: Three-dimensional Puncture Planning With Dyna-CT Is Superior to Conventional CT-guidance in an <i>Ex Vivo</i> Model.","authors":"Sebastian Schneider, Hans Ulrich Kerl, Miriam Freundt, Katrin E Herrmann, Christoph Groden, Máté E Maros, Sherif A Mohamed","doi":"10.21873/invivo.13875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Cervical selective nerve root block (CSNRB) is a widely used percutaneous procedure to diagnose and treat cervical radicular pain. The feasibility of a three-dimensional puncture planning and two-dimensional laser-guidance system has previously been shown in an <i>ex vivo</i> model. The purpose of this study was to further compare this technique to the conventional computed tomography (CT-)-guided approach.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty CSNRBs were performed, each with Dyna-CT and the Syngo iGuide<sup>®</sup> laser-guidance system (Artis Zee<sup>®</sup> Ceiling, Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany), and with conventional CT-guidance (Somatom Volume Zoom, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) in an <i>ex vivo</i> lamb model. The number of puncture attempts, procedural planning time, puncture time, and trajectory length were evaluated and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 60 punctures were rated as successful. Significantly less puncture attempts were needed with Dyna-CT compared to conventional CT-guidance (<i>p</i><0.0001). Procedural planning time and puncture time were significantly shorter with Dyna-CT (<i>p</i> <sub>plan.t</sub><0.0001 and <i>p</i> <sub>punc.t</sub>=0.0004) (median 77 s and 56 s, respectively) than with conventional CT-guidance (median 109 s and 159.5 s, respectively), There were no significant differences in trajectory length (Dyna-CT median 3.18 cm; conventional CT median 3.33 cm, <i>p</i>=0.651).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dyna-CT with Syngo iGuide<sup>®</sup> laser-guidance is superior to conventional CT-guidance for CSNRB in an <i>ex vivo</i> model. It significantly shortens the overall procedure time by reducing planning time, puncture time, and puncture attempts.</p>","PeriodicalId":13364,"journal":{"name":"In vivo","volume":"39 2","pages":"713-723"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11884481/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In vivo","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13875","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aim: Cervical selective nerve root block (CSNRB) is a widely used percutaneous procedure to diagnose and treat cervical radicular pain. The feasibility of a three-dimensional puncture planning and two-dimensional laser-guidance system has previously been shown in an ex vivo model. The purpose of this study was to further compare this technique to the conventional computed tomography (CT-)-guided approach.

Materials and methods: Thirty CSNRBs were performed, each with Dyna-CT and the Syngo iGuide® laser-guidance system (Artis Zee® Ceiling, Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany), and with conventional CT-guidance (Somatom Volume Zoom, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) in an ex vivo lamb model. The number of puncture attempts, procedural planning time, puncture time, and trajectory length were evaluated and compared.

Results: All 60 punctures were rated as successful. Significantly less puncture attempts were needed with Dyna-CT compared to conventional CT-guidance (p<0.0001). Procedural planning time and puncture time were significantly shorter with Dyna-CT (p plan.t<0.0001 and p punc.t=0.0004) (median 77 s and 56 s, respectively) than with conventional CT-guidance (median 109 s and 159.5 s, respectively), There were no significant differences in trajectory length (Dyna-CT median 3.18 cm; conventional CT median 3.33 cm, p=0.651).

Conclusion: Dyna-CT with Syngo iGuide® laser-guidance is superior to conventional CT-guidance for CSNRB in an ex vivo model. It significantly shortens the overall procedure time by reducing planning time, puncture time, and puncture attempts.

背景/目的:颈椎选择性神经根阻滞术(CSNRB)是一种广泛用于诊断和治疗颈椎根性疼痛的经皮手术。三维穿刺规划和二维激光制导系统的可行性已在体外模型中得到证实。本研究的目的是进一步比较该技术与传统的计算机断层扫描(CT)引导方法:在活体羔羊模型中,分别使用 Dyna-CT 和 Syngo iGuide® 激光导向系统(Artis Zee® Ceiling,西门子医疗解决方案公司,德国埃尔兰根)以及传统 CT 导向系统(Somatom Volume Zoom,西门子医疗保健公司,德国埃尔兰根)进行了 30 例 CSNRB。对穿刺尝试次数、程序规划时间、穿刺时间和轨迹长度进行了评估和比较:结果:60 次穿刺全部成功。与传统 CT 引导相比,Dyna-CT 所需的穿刺次数显著减少(pp plan.tp punc.t=0.0004)(中位数分别为 77 秒和 56 秒),中位数分别为 109 秒和 159.5 秒,轨迹长度无显著差异(Dyna-CT 中位数为 3.18 厘米;传统 CT 中位数为 3.33 厘米,p=0.651):结论:在体外模型中,采用Syngo iGuide®激光引导的Dyna-CT在CSNRB手术中优于传统CT引导。通过减少计划时间、穿刺时间和穿刺尝试次数,它大大缩短了整个手术时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
In vivo
In vivo 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
330
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: IN VIVO is an international peer-reviewed journal designed to bring together original high quality works and reviews on experimental and clinical biomedical research within the frames of physiology, pathology and disease management. The topics of IN VIVO include: 1. Experimental development and application of new diagnostic and therapeutic procedures; 2. Pharmacological and toxicological evaluation of new drugs, drug combinations and drug delivery systems; 3. Clinical trials; 4. Development and characterization of models of biomedical research; 5. Cancer diagnosis and treatment; 6. Immunotherapy and vaccines; 7. Radiotherapy, Imaging; 8. Tissue engineering, Regenerative medicine; 9. Carcinogenesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信