Flow Cytometry for Assessing Human Sperm Acrosomal Reaction (AR) and Correlation of AR and Acrosomal Enzyme Activity With Semen Parameters.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
In vivo Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.21873/invivo.13896
Zubin He, Jinliang Duan, Xin Zhou, Qingdi Quentin Li, Zhuguang Liang, Honglin Chen, Jian Xie, Jiaqiang Luo, Yaobin Wang, Guangzhi Liu, Meifang Zeng
{"title":"Flow Cytometry for Assessing Human Sperm Acrosomal Reaction (AR) and Correlation of AR and Acrosomal Enzyme Activity With Semen Parameters.","authors":"Zubin He, Jinliang Duan, Xin Zhou, Qingdi Quentin Li, Zhuguang Liang, Honglin Chen, Jian Xie, Jiaqiang Luo, Yaobin Wang, Guangzhi Liu, Meifang Zeng","doi":"10.21873/invivo.13896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate human sperm acrosomal reaction (AR) using flow cytometry and examine the correlation of AR and acrosomal enzyme activity (AEA) with seven semen parameters: total sperm count, concentration, vitality, motility, morphology, survival rate, and sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on semen data from 398 men in the AR group and 526 men in the AEA group. AR was assessed using flow cytometry, while AEA was measured with the solid-phase BAPNA method. Correlations between AR, AEA, and the seven semen parameters were analyzed. Subgroups based on standard reference values were also compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AEA demonstrated significant positive correlations with total sperm count, concentration, vitality, motility, morphology, and survival rate, and a negative correlation with DFI (<i>p</i><0.05). In contrast, AR correlated only with sperm concentration. Subgroup analyses revealed that in the AR group, the lower subgroup correlated with concentration and vitality, while the normal subgroup correlated only with concentration. In the AEA group, the normal subgroup showed significant correlations with all seven parameters, while none were found in the lower subgroup. The normal subgroup exhibited significantly higher total count, concentration, vitality, motility, morphology, and survival rate, and lower DFI (<i>p</i><0.05). No significant differences were observed between the normal and lower AR subgroups, except for survival rate (<i>p</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AEA shows stronger and more consistent correlations with semen parameters compared with AR, suggesting its potential as a reliable marker for evaluating male fertility. Further research is needed to clarify the predictive value of AR in male fertility assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":13364,"journal":{"name":"In vivo","volume":"39 2","pages":"917-926"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11884459/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In vivo","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13896","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aim: This study aimed to evaluate human sperm acrosomal reaction (AR) using flow cytometry and examine the correlation of AR and acrosomal enzyme activity (AEA) with seven semen parameters: total sperm count, concentration, vitality, motility, morphology, survival rate, and sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI).

Patients and methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on semen data from 398 men in the AR group and 526 men in the AEA group. AR was assessed using flow cytometry, while AEA was measured with the solid-phase BAPNA method. Correlations between AR, AEA, and the seven semen parameters were analyzed. Subgroups based on standard reference values were also compared.

Results: AEA demonstrated significant positive correlations with total sperm count, concentration, vitality, motility, morphology, and survival rate, and a negative correlation with DFI (p<0.05). In contrast, AR correlated only with sperm concentration. Subgroup analyses revealed that in the AR group, the lower subgroup correlated with concentration and vitality, while the normal subgroup correlated only with concentration. In the AEA group, the normal subgroup showed significant correlations with all seven parameters, while none were found in the lower subgroup. The normal subgroup exhibited significantly higher total count, concentration, vitality, motility, morphology, and survival rate, and lower DFI (p<0.05). No significant differences were observed between the normal and lower AR subgroups, except for survival rate (p>0.05).

Conclusion: AEA shows stronger and more consistent correlations with semen parameters compared with AR, suggesting its potential as a reliable marker for evaluating male fertility. Further research is needed to clarify the predictive value of AR in male fertility assessment.

流式细胞术评价人精子顶体反应及顶体酶活性与精液参数的相关性
背景/目的:本研究旨在应用流式细胞术评价人精子顶体反应(AR),并探讨AR和顶体酶活性(AEA)与精子总数量、浓度、活力、活力、形态、存活率和精子DNA碎片指数(DFI)等7项精液参数的相关性。患者和方法:回顾性分析AR组398例男性和AEA组526例男性的精液资料。AR采用流式细胞术测定,AEA采用固相BAPNA法测定。分析AR、AEA与7项精液参数的相关性。基于标准参考值的分组也进行了比较。结果:AEA与精子总数、精子浓度、活力、活力、形态、存活率呈显著正相关,与DFI呈显著负相关(p < 0.05)。结论:与AR相比,AEA与精液参数的相关性更强、更一致,可作为评价男性生育能力的可靠指标。AR在男性生育能力评估中的预测价值有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
In vivo
In vivo 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
330
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: IN VIVO is an international peer-reviewed journal designed to bring together original high quality works and reviews on experimental and clinical biomedical research within the frames of physiology, pathology and disease management. The topics of IN VIVO include: 1. Experimental development and application of new diagnostic and therapeutic procedures; 2. Pharmacological and toxicological evaluation of new drugs, drug combinations and drug delivery systems; 3. Clinical trials; 4. Development and characterization of models of biomedical research; 5. Cancer diagnosis and treatment; 6. Immunotherapy and vaccines; 7. Radiotherapy, Imaging; 8. Tissue engineering, Regenerative medicine; 9. Carcinogenesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信