Jinzhao Ji, Xiaoqing Ding, Chuanli Liu, Lingling Dai, Junting Yu, Linghao Li, Shaobing Wan, Yangyang Song, Junqing Zhao, Zhetong Su, Kun Jia, Shoujun Li
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of anemoside B4 in canine pneumonia treatment: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Jinzhao Ji, Xiaoqing Ding, Chuanli Liu, Lingling Dai, Junting Yu, Linghao Li, Shaobing Wan, Yangyang Song, Junqing Zhao, Zhetong Su, Kun Jia, Shoujun Li","doi":"10.3389/fvets.2025.1530318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Canine pneumonia is a serious respiratory disease often associated with Canine Infectious Respiratory Disease (CIRD). Current treatment strategies primarily rely on antibiotics and corticosteroids; however, the emergence of antibiotic resistance and potential side effects from prolonged corticosteroid use limit the effectiveness of these therapies in clinical practice. These challenges highlight the urgent need for alternative treatments. Anemoside B4 (AB4), derived from the traditional Chinese medicine <i>Pulsatilla</i>, has shown promise in preclinical studies for modulating inflammatory responses and improving clinical symptoms of pneumonia. Therefore, AB4 may offer a valuable alternative treatment option for canine pneumonia in veterinary medicine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Veterinary Drug Research and Evaluation Center of South China Agricultural University. Seventy-two dogs with mild-to-moderate pneumonia were randomly assigned to one of three groups: AB4, placebo, or Chuanxinlian injection (CXL). The primary outcome was the effect of AB4 on comprehensive clinical scoring of canine pneumonia; secondary outcomes included recovery times for primary symptoms and efficacy assessments. Additionally, AB4's safety in clinical applications was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AB4 group demonstrated significantly lower composite clinical scores on Days 7 and 14 compared to the placebo group (<i>p</i> = 0.033 and <i>p</i> = 0.000, respectively). Significant differences in recovery times for fever and dyspnea were observed between the AB4 and placebo groups (<i>p</i> = 0.041 and <i>p</i> = 0.024, respectively). Moreover, the cure rate and overall efficacy on Day 14 were significantly higher in the AB4 group than those in the placebo group (<i>p</i> = 0.001 and <i>p</i> = 0.009, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that AB4 may be a promising treatment option for canine pneumonia, potentially serving as an alternative to traditional therapies. Further research is needed to explore its clinical potential in veterinary medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":12772,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Veterinary Science","volume":"12 ","pages":"1530318"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11861352/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Veterinary Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1530318","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Canine pneumonia is a serious respiratory disease often associated with Canine Infectious Respiratory Disease (CIRD). Current treatment strategies primarily rely on antibiotics and corticosteroids; however, the emergence of antibiotic resistance and potential side effects from prolonged corticosteroid use limit the effectiveness of these therapies in clinical practice. These challenges highlight the urgent need for alternative treatments. Anemoside B4 (AB4), derived from the traditional Chinese medicine Pulsatilla, has shown promise in preclinical studies for modulating inflammatory responses and improving clinical symptoms of pneumonia. Therefore, AB4 may offer a valuable alternative treatment option for canine pneumonia in veterinary medicine.
Methods: A prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Veterinary Drug Research and Evaluation Center of South China Agricultural University. Seventy-two dogs with mild-to-moderate pneumonia were randomly assigned to one of three groups: AB4, placebo, or Chuanxinlian injection (CXL). The primary outcome was the effect of AB4 on comprehensive clinical scoring of canine pneumonia; secondary outcomes included recovery times for primary symptoms and efficacy assessments. Additionally, AB4's safety in clinical applications was evaluated.
Results: The AB4 group demonstrated significantly lower composite clinical scores on Days 7 and 14 compared to the placebo group (p = 0.033 and p = 0.000, respectively). Significant differences in recovery times for fever and dyspnea were observed between the AB4 and placebo groups (p = 0.041 and p = 0.024, respectively). Moreover, the cure rate and overall efficacy on Day 14 were significantly higher in the AB4 group than those in the placebo group (p = 0.001 and p = 0.009, respectively).
Conclusion: These findings suggest that AB4 may be a promising treatment option for canine pneumonia, potentially serving as an alternative to traditional therapies. Further research is needed to explore its clinical potential in veterinary medicine.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Veterinary Science is a global, peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that bridges animal and human health, brings a comparative approach to medical and surgical challenges, and advances innovative biotechnology and therapy.
Veterinary research today is interdisciplinary, collaborative, and socially relevant, transforming how we understand and investigate animal health and disease. Fundamental research in emerging infectious diseases, predictive genomics, stem cell therapy, and translational modelling is grounded within the integrative social context of public and environmental health, wildlife conservation, novel biomarkers, societal well-being, and cutting-edge clinical practice and specialization. Frontiers in Veterinary Science brings a 21st-century approach—networked, collaborative, and Open Access—to communicate this progress and innovation to both the specialist and to the wider audience of readers in the field.
Frontiers in Veterinary Science publishes articles on outstanding discoveries across a wide spectrum of translational, foundational, and clinical research. The journal''s mission is to bring all relevant veterinary sciences together on a single platform with the goal of improving animal and human health.