Daya Masri, Ehud Jonas, Omar Ghanaiem, Liat Chaushu
{"title":"Schneiderian membrane perforation repair using a crosslinked collagen membrane: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Daya Masri, Ehud Jonas, Omar Ghanaiem, Liat Chaushu","doi":"10.1186/s13005-025-00487-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Perforation of the Schneiderian membrane (SM) is a common intraoperative complication of sinus augmentation. This study aimed to evaluate risk factors for SM perforation, and to compare clinical outcomes between patients with SM perforation repaired using crosslinked collagen membranes (CLM) compared to those with an intact SM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single tertiary medical center. Data was collected on patients requiring sinus augmentation via lateral approach prior to implant placement. The collected data included demographics, surgical details, implant outcomes, radiographic analysis, and presence of SM perforation. In cases of perforation a CLM was used to repair the SM. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate risk factors for perforation and whether SM perforation repair using CLM influenced early implant failure (EIF). A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data on 194 individuals who underwent 278 lateral approach sinus augmentation procedures was collected. SM perforation occurred in 66 (23.74%) sinuses. Treatment of SM perforation using CLM yielded similar results to sinuses without perforations: EIF and the augmented gained bone did not correlate with SM perforation. Younger patients, and thick SMs (> 3 mm) had significantly lower risk of perforation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Older age and thinner SMs are risk factors for sinus membrane perforations. No significant differences in bone gain and EIF were found between perforated and intact membranes.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Schneiderian membrane perforation repair using crosslinked collagen membrane provides comparable results to sinus augmentations without perforations, demonstrating its effectiveness in preventing complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":12994,"journal":{"name":"Head & Face Medicine","volume":"21 1","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11866630/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head & Face Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-025-00487-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Perforation of the Schneiderian membrane (SM) is a common intraoperative complication of sinus augmentation. This study aimed to evaluate risk factors for SM perforation, and to compare clinical outcomes between patients with SM perforation repaired using crosslinked collagen membranes (CLM) compared to those with an intact SM.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single tertiary medical center. Data was collected on patients requiring sinus augmentation via lateral approach prior to implant placement. The collected data included demographics, surgical details, implant outcomes, radiographic analysis, and presence of SM perforation. In cases of perforation a CLM was used to repair the SM. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate risk factors for perforation and whether SM perforation repair using CLM influenced early implant failure (EIF). A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results: Data on 194 individuals who underwent 278 lateral approach sinus augmentation procedures was collected. SM perforation occurred in 66 (23.74%) sinuses. Treatment of SM perforation using CLM yielded similar results to sinuses without perforations: EIF and the augmented gained bone did not correlate with SM perforation. Younger patients, and thick SMs (> 3 mm) had significantly lower risk of perforation.
Conclusions: Older age and thinner SMs are risk factors for sinus membrane perforations. No significant differences in bone gain and EIF were found between perforated and intact membranes.
Clinical relevance: Schneiderian membrane perforation repair using crosslinked collagen membrane provides comparable results to sinus augmentations without perforations, demonstrating its effectiveness in preventing complications.
期刊介绍:
Head & Face Medicine is a multidisciplinary open access journal that publishes basic and clinical research concerning all aspects of cranial, facial and oral conditions.
The journal covers all aspects of cranial, facial and oral diseases and their management. It has been designed as a multidisciplinary journal for clinicians and researchers involved in the diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of diseases which affect the human head and face. The journal is wide-ranging, covering the development, aetiology, epidemiology and therapy of head and face diseases to the basic science that underlies these diseases. Management of head and face diseases includes all aspects of surgical and non-surgical treatments including psychopharmacological therapies.