The role of starting knee angle in squat jump force-velocity profiles: interactions with subjects' strength levels and imputed push-off distance.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
Frontiers in Physiology Pub Date : 2025-02-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fphys.2025.1551488
Xuelin Qin, Beibei Liu, Ruolin Tang, Yan Liu, Amador García-Ramos
{"title":"The role of starting knee angle in squat jump force-velocity profiles: interactions with subjects' strength levels and imputed push-off distance.","authors":"Xuelin Qin, Beibei Liu, Ruolin Tang, Yan Liu, Amador García-Ramos","doi":"10.3389/fphys.2025.1551488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study investigated whether differences in the force-velocity (F-v) profile obtained using Samozino's method during squat jumps (SJ) performed at varying knee angles are influenced by subjects' strength levels and the push-off distance (HpO) used in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-one resistance-trained men were classified as stronger (n = 10) or weaker (n = 11) based on the external load required to achieve a 10 cm SJ height. F-v profiles were randomly assessed over three sessions, with SJs performed at starting knee angles of 70° (SJ70), 90° (SJ90), and 110° (SJ110), using either the actual HpO specific to each condition or a standardized HpO corresponding to SJ90.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences between SJ types were observed for maximum force (<i>F</i> <sub>0</sub>) and the F-v slope (SJ110 > SJ90 > SJ70). These differences were never influenced by subjects' strength levels. The standardized HpO produced similar outcomes for maximum power (P<sub>max</sub>) and maximum velocity (<i>v</i> <sub>0</sub>), and more consistent results for <i>F</i> <sub>0</sub> and the F-v slope compared to the actual HpO.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Regardless of strength levels, standardizing HpO at 90° and allowing subjects to select a starting knee angle between 70° and 90° could simplify the evaluation process and improve the comparability of F-v profiles across subjects when using Samozino's method.</p>","PeriodicalId":12477,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Physiology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1551488"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11860981/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2025.1551488","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study investigated whether differences in the force-velocity (F-v) profile obtained using Samozino's method during squat jumps (SJ) performed at varying knee angles are influenced by subjects' strength levels and the push-off distance (HpO) used in the analysis.

Methods: Twenty-one resistance-trained men were classified as stronger (n = 10) or weaker (n = 11) based on the external load required to achieve a 10 cm SJ height. F-v profiles were randomly assessed over three sessions, with SJs performed at starting knee angles of 70° (SJ70), 90° (SJ90), and 110° (SJ110), using either the actual HpO specific to each condition or a standardized HpO corresponding to SJ90.

Results: Significant differences between SJ types were observed for maximum force (F 0) and the F-v slope (SJ110 > SJ90 > SJ70). These differences were never influenced by subjects' strength levels. The standardized HpO produced similar outcomes for maximum power (Pmax) and maximum velocity (v 0), and more consistent results for F 0 and the F-v slope compared to the actual HpO.

Discussion: Regardless of strength levels, standardizing HpO at 90° and allowing subjects to select a starting knee angle between 70° and 90° could simplify the evaluation process and improve the comparability of F-v profiles across subjects when using Samozino's method.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
2608
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Physiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research on the physiology of living systems, from the subcellular and molecular domains to the intact organism, and its interaction with the environment. Field Chief Editor George E. Billman at the Ohio State University Columbus is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信