Impacts of COVID-19 lockdown on PM2.5-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Hohhot, Northern China: characteristics, sources, and source-specific health risks.

IF 5.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Kailin Ji, Bing Sun, Haijun Zhou, Wenjing Sun, Xiaotao Fu, Ying Sun, Huifang Ren, Yangchao Lv, Xi Chun, Zhiqiang Wan
{"title":"Impacts of COVID-19 lockdown on PM<sub>2.5</sub>-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Hohhot, Northern China: characteristics, sources, and source-specific health risks.","authors":"Kailin Ji, Bing Sun, Haijun Zhou, Wenjing Sun, Xiaotao Fu, Ying Sun, Huifang Ren, Yangchao Lv, Xi Chun, Zhiqiang Wan","doi":"10.1186/s12940-025-01161-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quantifying the impacts of reduction strategies on PM<sub>2.5</sub>-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) is essential for reducing the health risks of PM<sub>2.5</sub>. The COVID-19 lockdown provided an opportunity to reveal the quantitative relationship between lockdown measures and the health risks of PAHs. In this study, the characteristics, sources, and health risks of PAHs were investigated during the COVID-19 lockdown in Hohhot. The source-specific health risks of PAHs were assessed using a combination of incremental lifetime cancer risk models (ILCR) and positive matrix factorization (PMF). Compared with the pre-LD period (pre-LD, 87.41 ± 5.98 ng·m<sup>-3</sup>), the total concentration of ∑PAHs during the lockdown period (LD, 32.52 ± 2.31 ng·m<sup>-3</sup>) decreased by 62.8% in Hohhot. Coal combustion (51.5%), gasoline emissions (21.9%), diesel emissions (12.9%), industrial emissions (9.3%), and biomass burning (4.7%) were the predominant sources of PAHs in Hohhot. Except for male children, the ILCR of all groups exceeded the threshold for high health risks (1 × 10<sup>- 4</sup>). Dermal contact is the predominant exposure pathway for carcinogenic risk. Compared with the pre-LD period, the ILCR values decreased by 62.5-62.7% during the LD period. The PMF-ILCR results indicated that industrial emissions (29.1%), coal combustion (28.4%), and diesel emissions (18.5%) were the main sources of ∑ILCR. A Monte Carlo simulation revealed that the cumulative carcinogenic risks at the 95th percentile of the six groups were 1.5-6.3 times the threshold of high health risk (1 × 10<sup>- 4</sup>). These results emphasize that regulating industrial emissions and coal combustion is effective in reducing carcinogenic risks in industrial cities with large coal consumption.</p>","PeriodicalId":11686,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11863873/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-025-01161-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quantifying the impacts of reduction strategies on PM2.5-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) is essential for reducing the health risks of PM2.5. The COVID-19 lockdown provided an opportunity to reveal the quantitative relationship between lockdown measures and the health risks of PAHs. In this study, the characteristics, sources, and health risks of PAHs were investigated during the COVID-19 lockdown in Hohhot. The source-specific health risks of PAHs were assessed using a combination of incremental lifetime cancer risk models (ILCR) and positive matrix factorization (PMF). Compared with the pre-LD period (pre-LD, 87.41 ± 5.98 ng·m-3), the total concentration of ∑PAHs during the lockdown period (LD, 32.52 ± 2.31 ng·m-3) decreased by 62.8% in Hohhot. Coal combustion (51.5%), gasoline emissions (21.9%), diesel emissions (12.9%), industrial emissions (9.3%), and biomass burning (4.7%) were the predominant sources of PAHs in Hohhot. Except for male children, the ILCR of all groups exceeded the threshold for high health risks (1 × 10- 4). Dermal contact is the predominant exposure pathway for carcinogenic risk. Compared with the pre-LD period, the ILCR values decreased by 62.5-62.7% during the LD period. The PMF-ILCR results indicated that industrial emissions (29.1%), coal combustion (28.4%), and diesel emissions (18.5%) were the main sources of ∑ILCR. A Monte Carlo simulation revealed that the cumulative carcinogenic risks at the 95th percentile of the six groups were 1.5-6.3 times the threshold of high health risk (1 × 10- 4). These results emphasize that regulating industrial emissions and coal combustion is effective in reducing carcinogenic risks in industrial cities with large coal consumption.

新冠肺炎疫情防控对呼和浩特市pm2.5结合多环芳烃的影响:特征、来源和来源特异性健康风险
量化减少策略对PM2.5结合的多环芳烃(PAHs)的影响对于降低PM2.5的健康风险至关重要。COVID-19封锁为揭示封锁措施与多环芳烃健康风险之间的定量关系提供了机会。本研究调查了呼和浩特市新冠肺炎疫情防控期间多环芳烃的特征、来源及健康风险。采用增量终身癌症风险模型(ILCR)和阳性矩阵分解(PMF)相结合的方法评估多环芳烃源特异性健康风险。与禁制期前(禁制期前为87.41±5.98 ng·m-3)相比,呼和浩特市禁制期总∑PAHs浓度(禁制期前为32.52±2.31 ng·m-3)下降了62.8%。燃煤排放(51.5%)、汽油排放(21.9%)、柴油排放(12.9%)、工业排放(9.3%)和生物质燃烧(4.7%)是呼和浩特市多环芳烃的主要排放源。除男童外,其余各组的ILCR均超过高健康风险阈值(1 × 10- 4)。皮肤接触是致癌风险的主要接触途径。与LD前相比,LD期间ILCR值下降了62.5 ~ 62.7%。PMF-ILCR结果表明,工业排放(29.1%)、燃煤排放(28.4%)和柴油排放(18.5%)是∑ILCR的主要来源。蒙特卡罗模拟显示,6组在第95百分位的累积致癌风险是高健康风险阈值(1 × 10- 4)的1.5-6.3倍。这些结果强调,在煤炭消耗量大的工业城市,规范工业排放和煤炭燃烧对降低致癌风险是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Health
Environmental Health 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
1.70%
发文量
115
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Health publishes manuscripts on all aspects of environmental and occupational medicine and related studies in toxicology and epidemiology. Environmental Health is aimed at scientists and practitioners in all areas of environmental science where human health and well-being are involved, either directly or indirectly. Environmental Health is a public health journal serving the public health community and scientists working on matters of public health interest and importance pertaining to the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信