Aris Karatasakis, Omid Kiamanesh, Richard K Cheng, James N Kirkpatrick, David M Dudzinski
{"title":"Echocardiographic Evaluation of the Post-Heart Transplant Patient.","authors":"Aris Karatasakis, Omid Kiamanesh, Richard K Cheng, James N Kirkpatrick, David M Dudzinski","doi":"10.1007/s11886-024-02169-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Significant practice variability exists with respect to the role and frequency of echocardiography after heart transplantation. We sought to illustrate key studies relating to the utility and diagnostic accuracy of echocardiography for the post-heart transplant patient.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Several echocardiographic parameters correlate with acute heart transplant rejection, but there is enough heterogeneity between study results or in diagnostic accuracy, such that it precludes parameter use in isolation to rule out rejection. Newer techniques such as strain echocardiography may have better sensitivity. Similarly, resting and stress echocardiography can be combined with modern techniques such as myocardial contrast echocardiography to diagnose and prognosticate cardiac allograft vasculopathy, but studies have again demonstrated variable accuracy. Echocardiography remains an accessible tool in the evaluation and management of patients after heart transplantation. This modality can guide clinical judgment with real-time data and several fairly sensitive parameters for the detection of rejection, cardiac allograft vasculopathy, and other abnormalities. Often, auxiliary diagnostic modalities need to be combined to optimize diagnostic accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10829,"journal":{"name":"Current Cardiology Reports","volume":"27 1","pages":"63"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Cardiology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-024-02169-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose of review: Significant practice variability exists with respect to the role and frequency of echocardiography after heart transplantation. We sought to illustrate key studies relating to the utility and diagnostic accuracy of echocardiography for the post-heart transplant patient.
Recent findings: Several echocardiographic parameters correlate with acute heart transplant rejection, but there is enough heterogeneity between study results or in diagnostic accuracy, such that it precludes parameter use in isolation to rule out rejection. Newer techniques such as strain echocardiography may have better sensitivity. Similarly, resting and stress echocardiography can be combined with modern techniques such as myocardial contrast echocardiography to diagnose and prognosticate cardiac allograft vasculopathy, but studies have again demonstrated variable accuracy. Echocardiography remains an accessible tool in the evaluation and management of patients after heart transplantation. This modality can guide clinical judgment with real-time data and several fairly sensitive parameters for the detection of rejection, cardiac allograft vasculopathy, and other abnormalities. Often, auxiliary diagnostic modalities need to be combined to optimize diagnostic accuracy.
期刊介绍:
The aim of this journal is to provide timely perspectives from experts on current advances in cardiovascular medicine. We also seek to provide reviews that highlight the most important recently published papers selected from the wealth of available cardiovascular literature.
We accomplish this aim by appointing key authorities in major subject areas across the discipline. Section editors select topics to be reviewed by leading experts who emphasize recent developments and highlight important papers published over the past year. An Editorial Board of internationally diverse members suggests topics of special interest to their country/region and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. We also provide commentaries from well-known figures in the field.