{"title":"Perspectives on aerosol inhalability: concepts and applications.","authors":"Robert F Phalen, Mark D Hoover, Roger O McClellan","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2025.2458276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The original motivation for the aerosol inhalability convention was to account for the fact that the inhalation efficiency of particles can cause the composition of the particle-containing air that is inhaled into the mouth and nose to differ significantly from the composition of the ambient air. Therefore, without appropriate adjustments for the inhalation efficiency of particles, air samples could over- or underestimate the actual exposures of inhaled materials, possibly compromising some workplace air standards. Subsequently, the concepts and applications of inhalability and inhalability sampling have been expanded to inhalation exposures outside of the workplace, including general human populations, medical patients, cell cultures, and animal research subjects. As described in this commentary, some of these applications have occurred in ways that could misrepresent actual exposures. Scientific advances in the understanding and applications of inhalability-related concepts are needed. Such advances will best be achieved through multidisciplinary collaborations involving modeling, wind tunnel mannequin and human subject studies, and health effects studies involving input from aerosol scientists, engineers, physiologists, anatomists, physicians, veterinarians, mathematical modelers, and regulators.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408444.2025.2458276","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The original motivation for the aerosol inhalability convention was to account for the fact that the inhalation efficiency of particles can cause the composition of the particle-containing air that is inhaled into the mouth and nose to differ significantly from the composition of the ambient air. Therefore, without appropriate adjustments for the inhalation efficiency of particles, air samples could over- or underestimate the actual exposures of inhaled materials, possibly compromising some workplace air standards. Subsequently, the concepts and applications of inhalability and inhalability sampling have been expanded to inhalation exposures outside of the workplace, including general human populations, medical patients, cell cultures, and animal research subjects. As described in this commentary, some of these applications have occurred in ways that could misrepresent actual exposures. Scientific advances in the understanding and applications of inhalability-related concepts are needed. Such advances will best be achieved through multidisciplinary collaborations involving modeling, wind tunnel mannequin and human subject studies, and health effects studies involving input from aerosol scientists, engineers, physiologists, anatomists, physicians, veterinarians, mathematical modelers, and regulators.
期刊介绍:
Critical Reviews in Toxicology provides up-to-date, objective analyses of topics related to the mechanisms of action, responses, and assessment of health risks due to toxicant exposure. The journal publishes critical, comprehensive reviews of research findings in toxicology and the application of toxicological information in assessing human health hazards and risks. Toxicants of concern include commodity and specialty chemicals such as formaldehyde, acrylonitrile, and pesticides; pharmaceutical agents of all types; consumer products such as macronutrients and food additives; environmental agents such as ambient ozone; and occupational exposures such as asbestos and benzene.