Closed Reduction and Minimally Invasive Fixation for the Treatment of Bilateral Displaced Posterior Pelvic Ring Disruption.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Current Medical Science Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1007/s11596-025-00027-1
Zhen Wang, Zhe Xu, Peng-Hui Xiang, Mei-Qi Gu, Rui Zhang, Hua Chen, Li He, Cheng-la Yi
{"title":"Closed Reduction and Minimally Invasive Fixation for the Treatment of Bilateral Displaced Posterior Pelvic Ring Disruption.","authors":"Zhen Wang, Zhe Xu, Peng-Hui Xiang, Mei-Qi Gu, Rui Zhang, Hua Chen, Li He, Cheng-la Yi","doi":"10.1007/s11596-025-00027-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Close reduction and internal fixation have gained popularity for the treatment of pelvic fractures. However, the closed reduction of bilateral displaced posterior pelvic ring disruption is a great challenge even for the most experienced surgeon. In this study, we describe in detail a novel unlocking closed reduction technique (UCRT) frame that allows strong traction for bilateral posterior pelvic ring displacement and presents preliminary clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 32 patients with bilateral displaced posterior pelvic ring disruptions (AO/OTA 61-C2 and C3) who were initially treated with this technique between July 2017 and July 2022. According to the AO/OTA classification, there were 9 cases (28.12%) of 61-C2, and 23 cases (71.88%) of 61-C3. There were 11 males, 21 females, with an average age of 38.1 years. The interval from injury to operation was 4-27 days, with a cut-off of 12.5 days (receiver operating characteristic curve). Operative time, blood loss, and postoperative radiographic findings were recorded. The functional outcomes and complications were followed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 30 (93.8%) patients achieved successful closed reduction, whereas 2 required open reduction. The successful closed reduction rate was 95.5% (21/22) in patients whose injury-to-operation time was less than 12.5 days. The vertical displacement percent correction of the obviously displaced hemipelvis was 70.20% ± 16.79% on average. The average degree of pelvic deformity correction was 64.86% ± 17.71%. Thirty patients were followed up for at least 12 months (12-36 months), and no complications of nonunion or redisplacement were observed. The Matta-Tornetta scoring standard revealed that the excellent (25/30) and good (4/30) rate was 96.7%. The Majeed clinical efficacy score revealed that the overall excellent and good rate was 100%. One patient had INFIX-related infection, and 2 reported numbness in the lateral thigh. The numbness was improved after INFIX removal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study presents an updated technique for closed reduction using a UCRT frame for bilateral posterior pelvic ring disruption, which has been shown to be effective, as indicated by excellent surgical and functional outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10820,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Science","volume":" ","pages":"137-145"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-025-00027-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Close reduction and internal fixation have gained popularity for the treatment of pelvic fractures. However, the closed reduction of bilateral displaced posterior pelvic ring disruption is a great challenge even for the most experienced surgeon. In this study, we describe in detail a novel unlocking closed reduction technique (UCRT) frame that allows strong traction for bilateral posterior pelvic ring displacement and presents preliminary clinical outcomes.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 32 patients with bilateral displaced posterior pelvic ring disruptions (AO/OTA 61-C2 and C3) who were initially treated with this technique between July 2017 and July 2022. According to the AO/OTA classification, there were 9 cases (28.12%) of 61-C2, and 23 cases (71.88%) of 61-C3. There were 11 males, 21 females, with an average age of 38.1 years. The interval from injury to operation was 4-27 days, with a cut-off of 12.5 days (receiver operating characteristic curve). Operative time, blood loss, and postoperative radiographic findings were recorded. The functional outcomes and complications were followed.

Results: A total of 30 (93.8%) patients achieved successful closed reduction, whereas 2 required open reduction. The successful closed reduction rate was 95.5% (21/22) in patients whose injury-to-operation time was less than 12.5 days. The vertical displacement percent correction of the obviously displaced hemipelvis was 70.20% ± 16.79% on average. The average degree of pelvic deformity correction was 64.86% ± 17.71%. Thirty patients were followed up for at least 12 months (12-36 months), and no complications of nonunion or redisplacement were observed. The Matta-Tornetta scoring standard revealed that the excellent (25/30) and good (4/30) rate was 96.7%. The Majeed clinical efficacy score revealed that the overall excellent and good rate was 100%. One patient had INFIX-related infection, and 2 reported numbness in the lateral thigh. The numbness was improved after INFIX removal.

Conclusions: This study presents an updated technique for closed reduction using a UCRT frame for bilateral posterior pelvic ring disruption, which has been shown to be effective, as indicated by excellent surgical and functional outcomes.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Medical Science
Current Medical Science Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
126
期刊介绍: Current Medical Science provides a forum for peer-reviewed papers in the medical sciences, to promote academic exchange between Chinese researchers and doctors and their foreign counterparts. The journal covers the subjects of biomedicine such as physiology, biochemistry, molecular biology, pharmacology, pathology and pathophysiology, etc., and clinical research, such as surgery, internal medicine, obstetrics and gynecology, pediatrics and otorhinolaryngology etc. The articles appearing in Current Medical Science are mainly in English, with a very small number of its papers in German, to pay tribute to its German founder. This journal is the only medical periodical in Western languages sponsored by an educational institution located in the central part of China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信