Anthony Vladimir Campos-Segura, Karin Alvarez, Alexis German Murillo Carrasco, Benedito Mauro Rossi, Mabel Bohorquez, Florencia Spirandelli, Claudio Benavides, Aina Balto, Adriana Della Valle, Luisina Inés Bruno, Francisco Lopez-Kostner, Marcia Cruz-Correa, Julio Sanchez Del Monte, Jorge Rugeles, Jesica Magalí Ramirez, Ivana Nascimento, Nora Manoukian Forones, Alicia Maria Cock-Rada, Carlos Reyes-Silva, Silvia Avila, Leandro Apolinario, Norma Teresa Rossi, Claudia Martin, Yasser Sulcahuaman, Carlos Alberto Vaccaro, Maria Del Carmen Castro-Mujica, Carlos Mario Muñeton Peña, Roseane Bicalho Assis, Elizabeth Silveira-Lucas, Chahuan Badir, Daniel Velez-Bohorquez, Gaston Boggio, Enrique Spirandelli, Florencia Neffa, Patricia Esperon, Florencia Carusso, Carolina Vergara, Mora Amat, María Teresa Pombo, Laura Noro, Marjorie De la Fuente, Tamara Canales, Alessandra Cassana, Gonzalo Carrasco-Avino, Julyann Pérez-Mayoral, Maria Gonzalez Pons, Angélica Hernández Guerrero, Silvia Vidal Millán, Sandra Beatriz Furfuro, Taisa Manuela Bonfim Machado Lopes, Thais Ferreira Bomfim Palma, Juliana Cortes Freitas, Maria Betânia Pereira Toralles, Thamara Claudia Ferreira Melo, Celia Aparecida Marques Pimenta, Luis José Palacios Fuenmayor, Gabriela Galvez-Salazar, Gabriela Jaramillo-Koupermann, Mariella Torres, Walter Hernán Pavicic, Ignacio Alberto Herrando, Juan Pablo Santino, Fabiana Alejandra Ferro, Carlos Afanador Ayala, Luri Drumond Louro, Silvio Conedera, Vessela Kristensen, Giovana Tardin Torrezan, Constantino Dominguez-Barrera, María de la Luz Ayala Madrigal, Melva Gutierrez, Patrik Wernhoff, Eivind Hovig, John-Paul Plazzer, Pål Møller, Yesilda Balavarca, Mev Dominguez-Valentin
{"title":"Characterization of Screening Strategies for Lynch Syndrome in Latin America.","authors":"Anthony Vladimir Campos-Segura, Karin Alvarez, Alexis German Murillo Carrasco, Benedito Mauro Rossi, Mabel Bohorquez, Florencia Spirandelli, Claudio Benavides, Aina Balto, Adriana Della Valle, Luisina Inés Bruno, Francisco Lopez-Kostner, Marcia Cruz-Correa, Julio Sanchez Del Monte, Jorge Rugeles, Jesica Magalí Ramirez, Ivana Nascimento, Nora Manoukian Forones, Alicia Maria Cock-Rada, Carlos Reyes-Silva, Silvia Avila, Leandro Apolinario, Norma Teresa Rossi, Claudia Martin, Yasser Sulcahuaman, Carlos Alberto Vaccaro, Maria Del Carmen Castro-Mujica, Carlos Mario Muñeton Peña, Roseane Bicalho Assis, Elizabeth Silveira-Lucas, Chahuan Badir, Daniel Velez-Bohorquez, Gaston Boggio, Enrique Spirandelli, Florencia Neffa, Patricia Esperon, Florencia Carusso, Carolina Vergara, Mora Amat, María Teresa Pombo, Laura Noro, Marjorie De la Fuente, Tamara Canales, Alessandra Cassana, Gonzalo Carrasco-Avino, Julyann Pérez-Mayoral, Maria Gonzalez Pons, Angélica Hernández Guerrero, Silvia Vidal Millán, Sandra Beatriz Furfuro, Taisa Manuela Bonfim Machado Lopes, Thais Ferreira Bomfim Palma, Juliana Cortes Freitas, Maria Betânia Pereira Toralles, Thamara Claudia Ferreira Melo, Celia Aparecida Marques Pimenta, Luis José Palacios Fuenmayor, Gabriela Galvez-Salazar, Gabriela Jaramillo-Koupermann, Mariella Torres, Walter Hernán Pavicic, Ignacio Alberto Herrando, Juan Pablo Santino, Fabiana Alejandra Ferro, Carlos Afanador Ayala, Luri Drumond Louro, Silvio Conedera, Vessela Kristensen, Giovana Tardin Torrezan, Constantino Dominguez-Barrera, María de la Luz Ayala Madrigal, Melva Gutierrez, Patrik Wernhoff, Eivind Hovig, John-Paul Plazzer, Pål Møller, Yesilda Balavarca, Mev Dominguez-Valentin","doi":"10.1016/j.cgh.2024.12.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & aims: </strong>In Latin America, genetic testing for Lynch syndrome (LS) has been partially implemented. Traditionally, LS diagnosis relied on the Amsterdam criteria and Bethesda guidelines, collectively known as traditional screening (TS). However, TS may miss up to 68% of LS cases. To improve detection rates, universal tumor screening (UTS) has been introduced. UTS involves screening all newly diagnosed patients with colorectal cancer for molecular markers to more effectively identify LS cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical and molecular data on 1684 patients with colorectal cancer, collected between 1999 and 2020, were provided by 24 Latin American genetic cancer registries and centers. Germline genetic testing was not consistently performed across all cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LS screening strategies were available for 72% (1209/1684) of cases, with germline testing conducted in one-quarter (304/1209) of these. Most cases (78%; n = 943) underwent UTS, primarily in Argentina, Chile, and Uruguay, whereas 22% (266/1209) were screened through TS. UTS identified deficient mismatch repair tumors in 29% (272/943) of cases. The rate of LS confirmed by sequencing was higher with UTS (53.3%; 65/122) compared with TS (47.8%; 87/182), although the difference was not statistically significant (P = .175).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>UTS is widely implemented in Latin America; however, the low detection rate of LS demonstrated in this study raises concerns about the routine use of germline genetic testing in our region. Our study provides real-world outcomes that highlight disparities in screening uptake and counseling referrals, illustrating the challenges that Latin American countries face in hereditary cancer syndrome screening. These results contribute to the rationale for designing effective screening strategies for LS, which may also be applicable to other hereditary cancer syndromes, ultimately.</p>","PeriodicalId":10347,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2024.12.026","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background & aims: In Latin America, genetic testing for Lynch syndrome (LS) has been partially implemented. Traditionally, LS diagnosis relied on the Amsterdam criteria and Bethesda guidelines, collectively known as traditional screening (TS). However, TS may miss up to 68% of LS cases. To improve detection rates, universal tumor screening (UTS) has been introduced. UTS involves screening all newly diagnosed patients with colorectal cancer for molecular markers to more effectively identify LS cases.
Methods: Clinical and molecular data on 1684 patients with colorectal cancer, collected between 1999 and 2020, were provided by 24 Latin American genetic cancer registries and centers. Germline genetic testing was not consistently performed across all cases.
Results: LS screening strategies were available for 72% (1209/1684) of cases, with germline testing conducted in one-quarter (304/1209) of these. Most cases (78%; n = 943) underwent UTS, primarily in Argentina, Chile, and Uruguay, whereas 22% (266/1209) were screened through TS. UTS identified deficient mismatch repair tumors in 29% (272/943) of cases. The rate of LS confirmed by sequencing was higher with UTS (53.3%; 65/122) compared with TS (47.8%; 87/182), although the difference was not statistically significant (P = .175).
Conclusions: UTS is widely implemented in Latin America; however, the low detection rate of LS demonstrated in this study raises concerns about the routine use of germline genetic testing in our region. Our study provides real-world outcomes that highlight disparities in screening uptake and counseling referrals, illustrating the challenges that Latin American countries face in hereditary cancer syndrome screening. These results contribute to the rationale for designing effective screening strategies for LS, which may also be applicable to other hereditary cancer syndromes, ultimately.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (CGH) is dedicated to offering readers a comprehensive exploration of themes in clinical gastroenterology and hepatology. Encompassing diagnostic, endoscopic, interventional, and therapeutic advances, the journal covers areas such as cancer, inflammatory diseases, functional gastrointestinal disorders, nutrition, absorption, and secretion.
As a peer-reviewed publication, CGH features original articles and scholarly reviews, ensuring immediate relevance to the practice of gastroenterology and hepatology. Beyond peer-reviewed content, the journal includes invited key reviews and articles on endoscopy/practice-based technology, health-care policy, and practice management. Multimedia elements, including images, video abstracts, and podcasts, enhance the reader's experience. CGH remains actively engaged with its audience through updates and commentary shared via platforms such as Facebook and Twitter.