{"title":"Assessment of the prevalence of hypotension in precapillary pulmonary hypertension patients with preserved right ventricle function.","authors":"Vedat Hekimsoy, Ergün Bariş Kaya","doi":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Lower SBP is associated with worse prognosis in precapillary pulmonary hypertension patients. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of hypotension in precapillary pulmonary hypertension patients with preserved right ventricle function receiving pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)-specific medication with 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and to compare the burden of hypotension between patients receiving PAH-specific monotherapy and dual combination therapy (DCT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 44 precapillary pulmonary hypertension patients who underwent clinical assessment, echocardiography, and 24-h ABPM. Patients were grouped according to the type of treatment regimen: monotherapy or DCT. Hypotension was defined as the occurrence of at least one valid measurement of SBP < 100 mmHg.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean 24-h, daytime, and nighttime SBP were significantly lower in patients receiving DCT compared to patients receiving monotherapy (P < 0.05 for all). Episodes with SBP < 100 mmHg during the 24-h, daytime, and nighttime periods were significantly more common in the patients receiving DCT (21.26 ± 9.33 vs 12.26 ± 3.61, 15.58 ± 8.17 vs 8.57 ± 3.60, 5.68 ± 2.63 vs 3.70 ± 2.27, respectively, P < 0.05 for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients on DCT who had relatively advanced pulmonary vascular disease have a higher burden of hypotension. We propose that estimation of the mortality risk relying on a single office blood pressure measurement, as is the case with contemporary risk scores, may give rise to inaccurate results and the incorporation of the assessment of hypotension burden with 24-h ABPM into the risk assessment tools might improve risk stratification.</p>","PeriodicalId":8950,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MBP.0000000000000747","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Lower SBP is associated with worse prognosis in precapillary pulmonary hypertension patients. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of hypotension in precapillary pulmonary hypertension patients with preserved right ventricle function receiving pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)-specific medication with 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and to compare the burden of hypotension between patients receiving PAH-specific monotherapy and dual combination therapy (DCT).
Methods: This cross-sectional study included 44 precapillary pulmonary hypertension patients who underwent clinical assessment, echocardiography, and 24-h ABPM. Patients were grouped according to the type of treatment regimen: monotherapy or DCT. Hypotension was defined as the occurrence of at least one valid measurement of SBP < 100 mmHg.
Results: Mean 24-h, daytime, and nighttime SBP were significantly lower in patients receiving DCT compared to patients receiving monotherapy (P < 0.05 for all). Episodes with SBP < 100 mmHg during the 24-h, daytime, and nighttime periods were significantly more common in the patients receiving DCT (21.26 ± 9.33 vs 12.26 ± 3.61, 15.58 ± 8.17 vs 8.57 ± 3.60, 5.68 ± 2.63 vs 3.70 ± 2.27, respectively, P < 0.05 for all).
Conclusion: Patients on DCT who had relatively advanced pulmonary vascular disease have a higher burden of hypotension. We propose that estimation of the mortality risk relying on a single office blood pressure measurement, as is the case with contemporary risk scores, may give rise to inaccurate results and the incorporation of the assessment of hypotension burden with 24-h ABPM into the risk assessment tools might improve risk stratification.
目的:低收缩压与毛细前肺动脉高压患者预后差相关。本研究旨在评估保留右心室功能的毛细血管前肺动脉高压患者接受肺动脉高压(PAH)特异性药物治疗并结合24小时动态血压监测(ABPM)的低血压患病率,并比较接受PAH特异性单药治疗和双联合治疗(DCT)患者的低血压负担。方法:本横断面研究包括44例毛细血管前肺动脉高压患者,他们接受了临床评估、超声心动图和24小时ABPM。患者根据治疗方案的类型进行分组:单药治疗或DCT。低血压定义为至少有一次有效的收缩压< 100 mmHg。结果:接受DCT治疗的患者平均24小时、白天和夜间收缩压明显低于接受单一治疗的患者(P < 0.05)。在接受DCT的患者中,24小时、白天和夜间收缩压< 100 mmHg的发生率分别为21.26±9.33 vs 12.26±3.61,15.58±8.17 vs 8.57±3.60,5.68±2.63 vs 3.70±2.27,P均< 0.05)。结论:较晚期肺血管疾病的DCT患者有较高的低血压负担。我们建议,与当代风险评分一样,仅依靠单一的办公室血压测量来估计死亡风险可能会导致不准确的结果,而将24小时ABPM低血压负担评估纳入风险评估工具可能会改善风险分层。
期刊介绍:
Blood Pressure Monitoring is devoted to original research in blood pressure measurement and blood pressure variability. It includes device technology, analytical methodology of blood pressure over time and its variability, clinical trials - including, but not limited to, pharmacology - involving blood pressure monitoring, blood pressure reactivity, patient evaluation, and outcomes and effectiveness research.
This innovative journal contains papers dealing with all aspects of manual, automated, and ambulatory monitoring. Basic and clinical science papers are considered although the emphasis is on clinical medicine.
Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.