Utilization of tree-based machine learning models for predicting low birth weight cases.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Flavio Leandro de Morais, Elisson da Silva Rocha, Gabriel Masson, Dimas Cassimiro do Nascimento Filho, Katia Maria Mendes, Raphael Augusto de Sousa Dourado, Waldemar Brandao Neto, Patricia Takako Endo
{"title":"Utilization of tree-based machine learning models for predicting low birth weight cases.","authors":"Flavio Leandro de Morais, Elisson da Silva Rocha, Gabriel Masson, Dimas Cassimiro do Nascimento Filho, Katia Maria Mendes, Raphael Augusto de Sousa Dourado, Waldemar Brandao Neto, Patricia Takako Endo","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-07303-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low birth weight (LBW) is a health condition that affects over 20 million gestational outcomes worldwide. The current literature indicates that machine learning models have the potential to assist healthcare professionals in predicting LBW and giving them the opportunity to intervene earlier in the pregnancy, which might include adjusting medical treatments or suggesting changes in diet.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study proposes the evaluation of machine learning models to predict which pregnant women are at risk of neonatal outcomes with LBW.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The methodology involves six phases, including data analysis and attribute selection through different techniques, which generated four distinct scenarios. We used five machine learning models and validated them through cross-validation and hyper-parameter optimization and evaluated their performance considering seven distinct metrics and statistical analysis, focusing on the effectiveness of the models in predicting LBW.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results revealed that the models achieved varying levels of performance across the scenarios, with the removal of duplicate data resulting in improvements in recall (0.83) and f1-score (0.64). Statistical analysis confirmed significant differences (p < 0.05) among most models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The conclusions of this study indicate that the removal of duplicate data and careful attribute selection positively influenced the performance of the machine learning models in predicting low birth weight. Additionally, the analysis of attribute importance highlighted socio-demographic characteristics and gestational history as the most influential in the training of the models.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"207"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11863662/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07303-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Low birth weight (LBW) is a health condition that affects over 20 million gestational outcomes worldwide. The current literature indicates that machine learning models have the potential to assist healthcare professionals in predicting LBW and giving them the opportunity to intervene earlier in the pregnancy, which might include adjusting medical treatments or suggesting changes in diet.

Purpose: This study proposes the evaluation of machine learning models to predict which pregnant women are at risk of neonatal outcomes with LBW.

Methods: The methodology involves six phases, including data analysis and attribute selection through different techniques, which generated four distinct scenarios. We used five machine learning models and validated them through cross-validation and hyper-parameter optimization and evaluated their performance considering seven distinct metrics and statistical analysis, focusing on the effectiveness of the models in predicting LBW.

Results: The results revealed that the models achieved varying levels of performance across the scenarios, with the removal of duplicate data resulting in improvements in recall (0.83) and f1-score (0.64). Statistical analysis confirmed significant differences (p < 0.05) among most models.

Conclusions: The conclusions of this study indicate that the removal of duplicate data and careful attribute selection positively influenced the performance of the machine learning models in predicting low birth weight. Additionally, the analysis of attribute importance highlighted socio-demographic characteristics and gestational history as the most influential in the training of the models.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信