Long-term urinary outcomes in classic bladder exstrophy: results of an extensive follow-up.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Sarah Abdellaoui, Fabiana Cazzorla, Nicolas Morel-Journel, Valeska Bidault, Paul Neuville, Alain Ruffion, Pierre D E Mouriquand, Delphine Demède
{"title":"Long-term urinary outcomes in classic bladder exstrophy: results of an extensive follow-up.","authors":"Sarah Abdellaoui, Fabiana Cazzorla, Nicolas Morel-Journel, Valeska Bidault, Paul Neuville, Alain Ruffion, Pierre D E Mouriquand, Delphine Demède","doi":"10.1111/bju.16680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate long-term outcomes and predictive factors of urinary continence (UC) and fecal continence (FC) after surgery for classic bladder exstrophy (CBE) using validated questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This study is part of the QUALEXSTRO study, a retrospective, observational, single-centre cohort study assessing through questionnaires UC, FC, sexuality, fertility, and quality of life in patients treated for CBE, who were aged of at least 15 years at evaluation. Herein, UC and FC were assessed using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) and the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (FIQL), respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 63 eligible patients, 42 patients responded to the study  (response rate 66.7%). Most patients were treated using the modern staged repair exstrophy technique (88.1%) with pelvic osteotomy (95.2%). A total of 69% of patients underwent continent urinary diversion, 61.9% underwent augmentation enterocystoplasty (AEC), and 7.1% underwent bladder neck closure. Additional endourological procedures were performed in 45.2% of patients. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age and follow-up were 26 (18-35) years and 22 (17-32) years, respectively. Regarding the voiding mode, 21.4% of patients were able to void spontaneously per urethra without intermittent catheterisation, while 76.2% performed clean intermittent self-catheterisation (CISC). All patients who underwent AEC performed intermittent catheterisation. The median (IQR) ICIQ-UI SF score was 8 (0-13) and was significantly better in women (P = 0.002). A total of 13 patients (30.9%) were continent (ICIQ-UI SF score = 0). Of these, three were able to void spontaneously per urethra, 10 used CISC, and seven underwent AEC. Most patients (66.7%) did not respond to the FIQL questionnaire since they had no concerns regarding FC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Achieving UC depends on both initial and subsequent surgeries, with few patients able to void per urethra during adulthood. Women have better urinary outcomes than men.</p>","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJU International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16680","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate long-term outcomes and predictive factors of urinary continence (UC) and fecal continence (FC) after surgery for classic bladder exstrophy (CBE) using validated questionnaires.

Patients and methods: This study is part of the QUALEXSTRO study, a retrospective, observational, single-centre cohort study assessing through questionnaires UC, FC, sexuality, fertility, and quality of life in patients treated for CBE, who were aged of at least 15 years at evaluation. Herein, UC and FC were assessed using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) and the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (FIQL), respectively.

Results: Of the 63 eligible patients, 42 patients responded to the study  (response rate 66.7%). Most patients were treated using the modern staged repair exstrophy technique (88.1%) with pelvic osteotomy (95.2%). A total of 69% of patients underwent continent urinary diversion, 61.9% underwent augmentation enterocystoplasty (AEC), and 7.1% underwent bladder neck closure. Additional endourological procedures were performed in 45.2% of patients. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age and follow-up were 26 (18-35) years and 22 (17-32) years, respectively. Regarding the voiding mode, 21.4% of patients were able to void spontaneously per urethra without intermittent catheterisation, while 76.2% performed clean intermittent self-catheterisation (CISC). All patients who underwent AEC performed intermittent catheterisation. The median (IQR) ICIQ-UI SF score was 8 (0-13) and was significantly better in women (P = 0.002). A total of 13 patients (30.9%) were continent (ICIQ-UI SF score = 0). Of these, three were able to void spontaneously per urethra, 10 used CISC, and seven underwent AEC. Most patients (66.7%) did not respond to the FIQL questionnaire since they had no concerns regarding FC.

Conclusions: Achieving UC depends on both initial and subsequent surgeries, with few patients able to void per urethra during adulthood. Women have better urinary outcomes than men.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJU International
BJU International 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.40%
发文量
262
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BJUI is one of the most highly respected medical journals in the world, with a truly international range of published papers and appeal. Every issue gives invaluable practical information in the form of original articles, reviews, comments, surgical education articles, and translational science articles in the field of urology. BJUI employs topical sections, and is in full colour, making it easier to browse or search for something specific.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信