Why should the baby live or not live? Decisions of Turkish pregnant women regarding the fate of pregnancy when there are fetal anomalies.

IF 0.7 4区医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH

African journal of reproductive health Pub Date : 2025-02-28 DOI:10.29063/ajrh2025/v29i2.11

Belgin Babadağli, Rahime Aydin Er, Nermin Ersoy

{"title":"Why should the baby live or not live? Decisions of Turkish pregnant women regarding the fate of pregnancy when there are fetal anomalies.","authors":"Belgin Babadağli, Rahime Aydin Er, Nermin Ersoy","doi":"10.29063/ajrh2025/v29i2.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated the decisions of pregnant women regarding the fate of pregnancy in cases of fetal anomalies. Using a cross sectional approach, data were gathered through a structured survey with hypothetical fetal anomalies. The data were analysed using SPSS 23.0. The preference for continuation of pregnancy was 58.7% in anencephaly and 92.4% in Down syndrome. The decision to continue the pregnancy was mainly justified by scruple, sin, and the baby's right to life. The reasons for terminating the pregnancy were the baby's short life expectancy, being exposed to discrimination, and not being forced to live a life of pain and suffering. Turkish pregnant women considered the anomaly in the fetus when choosing to continue or terminate the pregnancy. Considering that the preferences arose not only from religious and cultural factors but also from the risks associated with the diagnosis, it is imperative to manage these issues in prenatal diagnostic counselling offered to parents.</p>","PeriodicalId":7551,"journal":{"name":"African journal of reproductive health","volume":"29 2","pages":"94-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African journal of reproductive health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29063/ajrh2025/v29i2.11","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the decisions of pregnant women regarding the fate of pregnancy in cases of fetal anomalies. Using a cross sectional approach, data were gathered through a structured survey with hypothetical fetal anomalies. The data were analysed using SPSS 23.0. The preference for continuation of pregnancy was 58.7% in anencephaly and 92.4% in Down syndrome. The decision to continue the pregnancy was mainly justified by scruple, sin, and the baby's right to life. The reasons for terminating the pregnancy were the baby's short life expectancy, being exposed to discrimination, and not being forced to live a life of pain and suffering. Turkish pregnant women considered the anomaly in the fetus when choosing to continue or terminate the pregnancy. Considering that the preferences arose not only from religious and cultural factors but also from the risks associated with the diagnosis, it is imperative to manage these issues in prenatal diagnostic counselling offered to parents.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

African journal of reproductive health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-

CiteScore

1.20

自引率

10.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The African Journal of Reproductive Health is a multidisciplinary and international journal that publishes original research, comprehensive review articles, short reports, and commentaries on reproductive heath in Africa. The journal strives to provide a forum for African authors, as well as others working in Africa, to share findings on all aspects of reproductive health, and to disseminate innovative, relevant and useful information on reproductive health throughout the continent.