Association of exposure to ambient particulate matter with asthma in children: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY
Ximeng Ke, Shaodong Liu, Xue Wang, Jinlong You, Wei Zhang, Li Wang, Long Ge, Minzhen Wang, Shan Zheng
{"title":"Association of exposure to ambient particulate matter with asthma in children: Systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Ximeng Ke, Shaodong Liu, Xue Wang, Jinlong You, Wei Zhang, Li Wang, Long Ge, Minzhen Wang, Shan Zheng","doi":"10.2500/aap.2025.46.240115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To assess the association between airborne particulate matter (PM) exposure and the development of asthma in children, a systematic review and meta-analysis that included nearly 10 years of related literature was conducted. <b>Study Design:</b> The study investigators conducted a systematic review of relevant research articles published between March 2013 and March 2023, which were accessible through several medical literature data bases of. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to analyze the effects of PM on childhood asthma. Subgroup analyses, including exposure period, type of PM, regional factors, and study type, were also used. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to represent the estimated effect of the population. Publication bias was assessed by using the Egger test and funnel plot. Data analyses were performed using statistical analysis software and a systematic review management tool. <b>Results:</b> A total of 15,365 articles were identified, of which 19 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that PM exposure was positively correlated with asthma in children, with the overall random-effects risk estimates of OR 1.10 (95% CI, 1.07-1.13). In stratified analyses, PM exposure was found to be a risk factor for the development of childhood asthma. Both prenatal and postnatal PM exposure were associated with an increased risk of asthma in children, but prenatal exposure was associated with a greater increase in risk than postnatal exposure, with an effect estimate OR of 1.21 (95% CI, 1.02-1.43). In the analysis of different PM types, the OR of PM<sub>2.5</sub> (PM < 2.5 μm in diameter) exposure was OR 1.10 (95% CI, 1.05-1.15), and no association was found between PM<sub>10</sub> (PM < 10 μm in diameter), coarse PM (PM with an aerodynamic diameter between 2.5 and 10 μm), and black carbon BC (diameter of 0.01-0.05 μm) exposure. In different regional analyses, the effects of PM exposure on childhood asthma risk were OR 1.15 (95% CI, 1.13-1.17) in South America and OR 1.02 (95% CI, 1.01-1.03) in Asia, but no association was found in Europe and North America. In addition, the results of different study types only found that the literature that used the time-series research method had a significant association with OR 1.03 (95% CI, 1.02-1.04), whereas the literature that used the cohort study method had no statistical difference. <b>Conclusion:</b> Exposure to airborne PM increased the risk of asthma in children. Both prenatal and postnatal PM exposure was associated with an increased risk of childhood asthma, but prenatal PM exposure was associated with a greater increase than postnatal PM exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":7646,"journal":{"name":"Allergy and asthma proceedings","volume":"46 2","pages":"e43-e60"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy and asthma proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2500/aap.2025.46.240115","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the association between airborne particulate matter (PM) exposure and the development of asthma in children, a systematic review and meta-analysis that included nearly 10 years of related literature was conducted. Study Design: The study investigators conducted a systematic review of relevant research articles published between March 2013 and March 2023, which were accessible through several medical literature data bases of. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to analyze the effects of PM on childhood asthma. Subgroup analyses, including exposure period, type of PM, regional factors, and study type, were also used. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to represent the estimated effect of the population. Publication bias was assessed by using the Egger test and funnel plot. Data analyses were performed using statistical analysis software and a systematic review management tool. Results: A total of 15,365 articles were identified, of which 19 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that PM exposure was positively correlated with asthma in children, with the overall random-effects risk estimates of OR 1.10 (95% CI, 1.07-1.13). In stratified analyses, PM exposure was found to be a risk factor for the development of childhood asthma. Both prenatal and postnatal PM exposure were associated with an increased risk of asthma in children, but prenatal exposure was associated with a greater increase in risk than postnatal exposure, with an effect estimate OR of 1.21 (95% CI, 1.02-1.43). In the analysis of different PM types, the OR of PM2.5 (PM < 2.5 μm in diameter) exposure was OR 1.10 (95% CI, 1.05-1.15), and no association was found between PM10 (PM < 10 μm in diameter), coarse PM (PM with an aerodynamic diameter between 2.5 and 10 μm), and black carbon BC (diameter of 0.01-0.05 μm) exposure. In different regional analyses, the effects of PM exposure on childhood asthma risk were OR 1.15 (95% CI, 1.13-1.17) in South America and OR 1.02 (95% CI, 1.01-1.03) in Asia, but no association was found in Europe and North America. In addition, the results of different study types only found that the literature that used the time-series research method had a significant association with OR 1.03 (95% CI, 1.02-1.04), whereas the literature that used the cohort study method had no statistical difference. Conclusion: Exposure to airborne PM increased the risk of asthma in children. Both prenatal and postnatal PM exposure was associated with an increased risk of childhood asthma, but prenatal PM exposure was associated with a greater increase than postnatal PM exposure.

暴露于环境颗粒物与儿童哮喘的关系:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:为了评估空气中颗粒物(PM)暴露与儿童哮喘发生之间的关系,对近10年的相关文献进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。研究设计:研究人员对2013年3月至2023年3月期间发表的相关研究文章进行了系统综述,这些文章可通过多个医学文献数据库获取。随机效应荟萃分析用于分析PM对儿童哮喘的影响。还使用了亚组分析,包括暴露期、PM类型、区域因素和研究类型。比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)表示总体的估计效果。采用Egger检验和漏斗图评价发表偏倚。使用统计分析软件和系统评审管理工具进行数据分析。结果:共纳入15365篇文献,其中19篇纳入meta分析。结果显示,PM暴露与儿童哮喘呈正相关,总体随机效应风险估计OR为1.10 (95% CI, 1.07-1.13)。在分层分析中,PM暴露被发现是儿童哮喘发展的一个危险因素。产前和产后PM暴露均与儿童哮喘风险增加相关,但产前暴露与风险增加的相关性大于产后暴露,效应估计OR为1.21 (95% CI, 1.02-1.43)。在不同PM类型的分析中,PM2.5 (PM < 2.5 μm)暴露的OR为OR 1.10 (95% CI为1.05 ~ 1.15),PM10 (PM < 10 μm)、粗PM (PM的空气动力学直径在2.5 ~ 10 μm之间)和黑碳BC(直径在0.01 ~ 0.05 μm之间)暴露之间没有相关性。在不同的区域分析中,PM暴露对儿童哮喘风险的影响在南美洲为OR 1.15 (95% CI, 1.13-1.17),在亚洲为OR 1.02 (95% CI, 1.01-1.03),但在欧洲和北美未发现关联。此外,不同研究类型的结果仅发现采用时间序列研究方法的文献与OR 1.03有显著相关性(95% CI, 1.02-1.04),而采用队列研究方法的文献无统计学差异。结论:空气中PM暴露增加了儿童哮喘的风险。产前和产后PM暴露均与儿童哮喘风险增加相关,但产前PM暴露与产后PM暴露的相关性更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
35.70%
发文量
106
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Allergy & Asthma Proceedings is a peer reviewed publication dedicated to distributing timely scientific research regarding advancements in the knowledge and practice of allergy, asthma and immunology. Its primary readership consists of allergists and pulmonologists. The goal of the Proceedings is to publish articles with a predominantly clinical focus which directly impact quality of care for patients with allergic disease and asthma. Featured topics include asthma, rhinitis, sinusitis, food allergies, allergic skin diseases, diagnostic techniques, allergens, and treatment modalities. Published material includes peer-reviewed original research, clinical trials and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信