Artificial Intelligence Assisted Creativity: Conceptualization, Instrument Development and Validation

IF 2.8 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Pui Yi Mok, Hsueh-Hua Chuang, Ming-Min Cheng, Thomas J. Smith
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence Assisted Creativity: Conceptualization, Instrument Development and Validation","authors":"Pui Yi Mok,&nbsp;Hsueh-Hua Chuang,&nbsp;Ming-Min Cheng,&nbsp;Thomas J. Smith","doi":"10.1002/jocb.70004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Considering the pivotal role of creativity across various eras and the rapid integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in both creative processes and education, this study introduces and provides validity evidence for the AI-assisted Creativity Questionnaire (AICQ). This new 16-item instrument aims to quantify human creative potential in AI-assisted endeavors. Initially, a diverse cohort of 322 university students in Taiwan completed the AICQ from November to December 2023. Through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of responses from this sample, three distinct factors emerged: (1) AI-assisted functional creativity (AIFC), (2) AI-assisted visual artistic creativity (AIVAC), and (3) AI-assisted ideational creativity (AIIC). One item was removed due to cross-loading. Subsequently, in September 2024, 330 university students in Taiwan engaged with both the AICQ and the 28-item Creative Behavior Inventory (CBI). Based on responses from this sample, construct validity evidence for the AICQ was examined using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), which affirmed that a three-factor model provided a good fit to the data. Gender differences in AICQ scores were found in these subsequent data. Overall, data from participants provided evidence for the reliability as well as convergent, concurrent, and discriminant validity of the scores obtained from the AICQ.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":39915,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Creative Behavior","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Creative Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jocb.70004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Considering the pivotal role of creativity across various eras and the rapid integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in both creative processes and education, this study introduces and provides validity evidence for the AI-assisted Creativity Questionnaire (AICQ). This new 16-item instrument aims to quantify human creative potential in AI-assisted endeavors. Initially, a diverse cohort of 322 university students in Taiwan completed the AICQ from November to December 2023. Through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of responses from this sample, three distinct factors emerged: (1) AI-assisted functional creativity (AIFC), (2) AI-assisted visual artistic creativity (AIVAC), and (3) AI-assisted ideational creativity (AIIC). One item was removed due to cross-loading. Subsequently, in September 2024, 330 university students in Taiwan engaged with both the AICQ and the 28-item Creative Behavior Inventory (CBI). Based on responses from this sample, construct validity evidence for the AICQ was examined using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), which affirmed that a three-factor model provided a good fit to the data. Gender differences in AICQ scores were found in these subsequent data. Overall, data from participants provided evidence for the reliability as well as convergent, concurrent, and discriminant validity of the scores obtained from the AICQ.

人工智能辅助创造力:概念化、工具开发和验证
考虑到创造力在各个时代的关键作用,以及人工智能(AI)在创造过程和教育中的快速整合,本研究引入并提供了AI辅助创造力问卷(AICQ)的效度证据。这个新的16项工具旨在量化人类在人工智能辅助下的创造潜力。最初,来自台湾的322名大学生在2023年11月至12月期间完成了AICQ。通过对样本的探索性因子分析(EFA),发现了三个不同的因素:(1)人工智能辅助功能创造力(AIFC),(2)人工智能辅助视觉艺术创造力(AIVAC),(3)人工智能辅助创意创造力(AIIC)。由于交叉装载,有一件物品被移除了。随后,在2024年9月,330名台湾大学生参与了AICQ和28项创造性行为量表(CBI)。根据该样本的回复,使用验证性因子分析(CFA)对AICQ的结构效度证据进行了检验,证实了三因素模型可以很好地拟合数据。在这些后续数据中发现了AICQ得分的性别差异。总体而言,来自参与者的数据为从AICQ获得的分数的信度以及收敛效度、并发效度和判别效度提供了证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Creative Behavior
Journal of Creative Behavior Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The Journal of Creative Behavior is our quarterly academic journal citing the most current research in creative thinking. For nearly four decades JCB has been the benchmark scientific periodical in the field. It provides up to date cutting-edge ideas about creativity in education, psychology, business, arts and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信