Attribution of Flood Forecasting Errors From a Multi-Model Perspective in Milan Urbanized River Basins

IF 3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
A. Ceppi, E. Gambini, G. Ravazzani, G. Lombardi, L. Cerri, S. Meucci, M. Mancini
{"title":"Attribution of Flood Forecasting Errors From a Multi-Model Perspective in Milan Urbanized River Basins","authors":"A. Ceppi,&nbsp;E. Gambini,&nbsp;G. Ravazzani,&nbsp;G. Lombardi,&nbsp;L. Cerri,&nbsp;S. Meucci,&nbsp;M. Mancini","doi":"10.1111/jfr3.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In synergy with hydraulic works, hydro-meteorological forecasts and related preventive protection measures are effective tools for mitigating flood risk. Nevertheless, the performance and reliability of coupled prediction systems in real-time operations are often influenced by errors in meteorological and hydrological models and their interactions. The paper discusses the source and magnitude of such combined errors, analyzing the functionality of a warning system to predict river floods in northern Italian catchments. The proposed flood alert tool consists of a hydrological model, driven by atmospheric forcings from various weather models and ground observations. This study aims to analyze the sources of flood forecasting errors in small urbanized river basins by disentangling the uncertainties in precipitation and discharge predictions. The results emphasize the relationship between quantitative precipitation and peak discharge forecast errors during convective and stratiform events, with a prevalent tendency toward underestimation of peak flows. The paper highlights the added value and limitations of the real-time multi-model approach as an effective compromise amidst the wide spread of model forecasts. This assessment is based on 4 years of operational simulations (2019–2022) on the river Seveso, where a municipal monitoring system for flood alerts (MOCAP) has also been implemented to support local civil protection procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":49294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfr3.70023","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfr3.70023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In synergy with hydraulic works, hydro-meteorological forecasts and related preventive protection measures are effective tools for mitigating flood risk. Nevertheless, the performance and reliability of coupled prediction systems in real-time operations are often influenced by errors in meteorological and hydrological models and their interactions. The paper discusses the source and magnitude of such combined errors, analyzing the functionality of a warning system to predict river floods in northern Italian catchments. The proposed flood alert tool consists of a hydrological model, driven by atmospheric forcings from various weather models and ground observations. This study aims to analyze the sources of flood forecasting errors in small urbanized river basins by disentangling the uncertainties in precipitation and discharge predictions. The results emphasize the relationship between quantitative precipitation and peak discharge forecast errors during convective and stratiform events, with a prevalent tendency toward underestimation of peak flows. The paper highlights the added value and limitations of the real-time multi-model approach as an effective compromise amidst the wide spread of model forecasts. This assessment is based on 4 years of operational simulations (2019–2022) on the river Seveso, where a municipal monitoring system for flood alerts (MOCAP) has also been implemented to support local civil protection procedures.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Flood Risk Management
Journal of Flood Risk Management ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-WATER RESOURCES
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
7.30%
发文量
93
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Flood Risk Management provides an international platform for knowledge sharing in all areas related to flood risk. Its explicit aim is to disseminate ideas across the range of disciplines where flood related research is carried out and it provides content ranging from leading edge academic papers to applied content with the practitioner in mind. Readers and authors come from a wide background and include hydrologists, meteorologists, geographers, geomorphologists, conservationists, civil engineers, social scientists, policy makers, insurers and practitioners. They share an interest in managing the complex interactions between the many skills and disciplines that underpin the management of flood risk across the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信