Effective measuring campaigns for reliable and informative full-scale WWTP data†

IF 3.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Q. H. Le, P. Carrera, M. C. M. van Loosdrecht and E. I. P. Volcke
{"title":"Effective measuring campaigns for reliable and informative full-scale WWTP data†","authors":"Q. H. Le, P. Carrera, M. C. M. van Loosdrecht and E. I. P. Volcke","doi":"10.1039/D4EW00315B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Sensor availability and costs are nowadays no longer limiting data gathering at wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). However, one should be aware that a higher amount of measured data gathered does not necessarily imply that also more information is obtained. In this light, this contribution assesses the general applicability and the added value of a structured experimental design approach for planning measurement campaigns at WWTPs, in view of mass-balance-based data reconciliation. To this end, the results from full-scale WWTP case studies available in the literature were compared to those obtained with the developed structured experimental design procedure. Planning measurement campaigns comprises the selection of (additional) measurements to meet a pre-set main goal. The need for a structured experimental design procedure replacing past expert judgment approaches became clear from the fact that three out of five case studies available in the literature failed to meet the main goal and/or performed unnecessary additional measurements. Translating the main goal into specific key variables was found essential in this respect. The general applicability of the procedure was proven with three outcomes. First, the procedure, involving well-defined steps, could be applied to different WWTP layouts. Second, it ensured the fulfilment of various main goals. Third, it provided useful outcomes, <em>i.e.</em>, optimal measurement campaigns, which reduced the need for additional measurements (40–70% less) compared to expert knowledge approaches, hence more information could be obtained with less analytical data. Overall, the experimental design procedure proved a fast and useful tool ensuring the success of subsequent mass-balance-based data reconciliation.</p>","PeriodicalId":75,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology","volume":" 3","pages":" 667-680"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2025/ew/d4ew00315b?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/ew/d4ew00315b","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sensor availability and costs are nowadays no longer limiting data gathering at wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). However, one should be aware that a higher amount of measured data gathered does not necessarily imply that also more information is obtained. In this light, this contribution assesses the general applicability and the added value of a structured experimental design approach for planning measurement campaigns at WWTPs, in view of mass-balance-based data reconciliation. To this end, the results from full-scale WWTP case studies available in the literature were compared to those obtained with the developed structured experimental design procedure. Planning measurement campaigns comprises the selection of (additional) measurements to meet a pre-set main goal. The need for a structured experimental design procedure replacing past expert judgment approaches became clear from the fact that three out of five case studies available in the literature failed to meet the main goal and/or performed unnecessary additional measurements. Translating the main goal into specific key variables was found essential in this respect. The general applicability of the procedure was proven with three outcomes. First, the procedure, involving well-defined steps, could be applied to different WWTP layouts. Second, it ensured the fulfilment of various main goals. Third, it provided useful outcomes, i.e., optimal measurement campaigns, which reduced the need for additional measurements (40–70% less) compared to expert knowledge approaches, hence more information could be obtained with less analytical data. Overall, the experimental design procedure proved a fast and useful tool ensuring the success of subsequent mass-balance-based data reconciliation.

Abstract Image

有效的测量活动,可靠和信息全面的污水处理厂数据†
如今,传感器的可用性和成本不再限制污水处理厂(WWTPs)的数据收集。然而,人们应该意识到,更多的测量数据收集并不一定意味着也获得更多的信息。有鉴于此,鉴于基于质量平衡的数据协调,本贡献评估了在污水处理厂规划测量活动的结构化实验设计方法的一般适用性和附加价值。为此,将文献中可获得的全规模污水处理厂案例研究结果与已开发的结构化实验设计程序所获得的结果进行了比较。计划度量活动包括(额外的)度量的选择,以满足预先设定的主要目标。从文献中可获得的五个案例研究中有三个未能达到主要目标和/或进行了不必要的额外测量这一事实可以清楚地看出,需要一个结构化的实验设计程序来取代过去的专家判断方法。在这方面,将主要目标转化为具体的关键变量是至关重要的。通过三个结果证明了该程序的普遍适用性。首先,该过程包括定义良好的步骤,可以应用于不同的WWTP布局。二是确保各项主要目标的实现。第三,它提供了有用的结果,即最佳的测量活动,与专家知识方法相比,减少了对额外测量的需求(减少40-70%),因此可以用更少的分析数据获得更多的信息。总的来说,实验设计过程被证明是一个快速而有用的工具,确保了随后基于质量平衡的数据调和的成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTALENVIRONMENTAL SC-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
206
期刊介绍: Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology seeks to showcase high quality research about fundamental science, innovative technologies, and management practices that promote sustainable water.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信