Efficacy and safety of Shexiang Baoxin Pill in patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary arteries: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase Ⅳ clinical trial

IF 6.7 1区 医学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Zhiqing He , Na Li , Wei Zhang , Xianhao Meng , Jingping Wang , Lihong Gong , Bing Liu , Mingqi Zheng , Zhuo Shang , Jianjiang Xu , Piqiao Jiang , Qingxia Zhao , Boning Xu , Chun Liang
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of Shexiang Baoxin Pill in patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary arteries: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase Ⅳ clinical trial","authors":"Zhiqing He ,&nbsp;Na Li ,&nbsp;Wei Zhang ,&nbsp;Xianhao Meng ,&nbsp;Jingping Wang ,&nbsp;Lihong Gong ,&nbsp;Bing Liu ,&nbsp;Mingqi Zheng ,&nbsp;Zhuo Shang ,&nbsp;Jianjiang Xu ,&nbsp;Piqiao Jiang ,&nbsp;Qingxia Zhao ,&nbsp;Boning Xu ,&nbsp;Chun Liang","doi":"10.1016/j.phymed.2025.156556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Solid evidence generated from large studies supporting the recommendation of Shexiang Baoxin Pill (MUSKARDIA) as a promising treatment for angina and nonobstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA) populations is lacking.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of MUSKARDIA in patients with ANOCA.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase IV trial, we enrolled 239 patients with ANOCA at 11 centers across China between May 2021 and July 2023. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive MUSKARDIA or placebo (orally 4 pills thrice daily) based on conventional treatment for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in angina-related outcomes, assessed using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) scores for the treatment groups at week 12.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 239 randomized patients with ANOCA, 236 (MUSKARDIA group, <em>n</em> = 117; placebo group, <em>n</em> = 119) completed treatment and endpoint assessments. At week 12, patients in the MUSKARDIA group showed better angina-related outcomes, with a more rapid increase in SAQ scores, than those in the placebo group (all <em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001). Statistically significant differences favoring MUSKARDIA over placebo were observed for change in angina attack frequency compared with baseline at week 12 (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001). Meanwhile, according to the Canadian Cardiovascular Society grading of angina, the change in angina pectoris severity, compared with baseline, was significantly reduced in MUSKARDIA group compared with placebo group at week 12 (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001). The percentage of patients who did not use sublingual nitroglycerin was noticeably higher in MUSKARDIA group than that in placebo group (84.16 % <em>vs.</em> 58.33 %; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). The incidence of adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups, and no serious adverse events occurred.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial firstly confirmed that MUSKARDIA was an effective, safe, and well-tolerated treatment for patients with ANOCA in clinical settings. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04897126).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20212,"journal":{"name":"Phytomedicine","volume":"139 ","pages":"Article 156556"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phytomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0944711325001965","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Solid evidence generated from large studies supporting the recommendation of Shexiang Baoxin Pill (MUSKARDIA) as a promising treatment for angina and nonobstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA) populations is lacking.

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of MUSKARDIA in patients with ANOCA.

Methods

In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase IV trial, we enrolled 239 patients with ANOCA at 11 centers across China between May 2021 and July 2023. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive MUSKARDIA or placebo (orally 4 pills thrice daily) based on conventional treatment for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in angina-related outcomes, assessed using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) scores for the treatment groups at week 12.

Results

Among 239 randomized patients with ANOCA, 236 (MUSKARDIA group, n = 117; placebo group, n = 119) completed treatment and endpoint assessments. At week 12, patients in the MUSKARDIA group showed better angina-related outcomes, with a more rapid increase in SAQ scores, than those in the placebo group (all p < 0.0001). Statistically significant differences favoring MUSKARDIA over placebo were observed for change in angina attack frequency compared with baseline at week 12 (p < 0.0001). Meanwhile, according to the Canadian Cardiovascular Society grading of angina, the change in angina pectoris severity, compared with baseline, was significantly reduced in MUSKARDIA group compared with placebo group at week 12 (p < 0.0001). The percentage of patients who did not use sublingual nitroglycerin was noticeably higher in MUSKARDIA group than that in placebo group (84.16 % vs. 58.33 %; p < 0.001). The incidence of adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups, and no serious adverse events occurred.

Conclusion

This randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial firstly confirmed that MUSKARDIA was an effective, safe, and well-tolerated treatment for patients with ANOCA in clinical settings. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04897126).

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Phytomedicine
Phytomedicine 医学-药学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
670
审稿时长
91 days
期刊介绍: Phytomedicine is a therapy-oriented journal that publishes innovative studies on the efficacy, safety, quality, and mechanisms of action of specified plant extracts, phytopharmaceuticals, and their isolated constituents. This includes clinical, pharmacological, pharmacokinetic, and toxicological studies of herbal medicinal products, preparations, and purified compounds with defined and consistent quality, ensuring reproducible pharmacological activity. Founded in 1994, Phytomedicine aims to focus and stimulate research in this field and establish internationally accepted scientific standards for pharmacological studies, proof of clinical efficacy, and safety of phytomedicines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信