Jia Ren , Yang Dong , Huang Min , Zhou Fang , Manzheng Zhang
{"title":"Improvement and uncertainty evaluation of a static gravimetric facility for natural gas","authors":"Jia Ren , Yang Dong , Huang Min , Zhou Fang , Manzheng Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2025.102842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The mass & time facility was built up as a flow rate primary standard for natural gas operated from 3 bar to 60 bar in CVB in 2017. The calibration uncertainty for CFVs is from 0.12 % to 0.10 %(<em>k</em> = 2). To further reduced the calibration uncertainty, several methods were used including reducing buoyancy effect caused by gas filling, consolidating the frame of the weighting system, improving the positioning accuracy of the hanging system, monitoring the exact diverting position and controlling the temperature and humidity of the whole testing area. The uncertainty budget and preliminary test showed that the mass measurement uncertainty of gas was improved from 1.0 g to 0.5 g and the calibration uncertainty for CFVs would be better than 0.10 %(<em>k</em> = 2) over 3 bar–60 bar.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50440,"journal":{"name":"Flow Measurement and Instrumentation","volume":"104 ","pages":"Article 102842"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Flow Measurement and Instrumentation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955598625000342","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The mass & time facility was built up as a flow rate primary standard for natural gas operated from 3 bar to 60 bar in CVB in 2017. The calibration uncertainty for CFVs is from 0.12 % to 0.10 %(k = 2). To further reduced the calibration uncertainty, several methods were used including reducing buoyancy effect caused by gas filling, consolidating the frame of the weighting system, improving the positioning accuracy of the hanging system, monitoring the exact diverting position and controlling the temperature and humidity of the whole testing area. The uncertainty budget and preliminary test showed that the mass measurement uncertainty of gas was improved from 1.0 g to 0.5 g and the calibration uncertainty for CFVs would be better than 0.10 %(k = 2) over 3 bar–60 bar.
期刊介绍:
Flow Measurement and Instrumentation is dedicated to disseminating the latest research results on all aspects of flow measurement, in both closed conduits and open channels. The design of flow measurement systems involves a wide variety of multidisciplinary activities including modelling the flow sensor, the fluid flow and the sensor/fluid interactions through the use of computation techniques; the development of advanced transducer systems and their associated signal processing and the laboratory and field assessment of the overall system under ideal and disturbed conditions.
FMI is the essential forum for critical information exchange, and contributions are particularly encouraged in the following areas of interest:
Modelling: the application of mathematical and computational modelling to the interaction of fluid dynamics with flowmeters, including flowmeter behaviour, improved flowmeter design and installation problems. Application of CAD/CAE techniques to flowmeter modelling are eligible.
Design and development: the detailed design of the flowmeter head and/or signal processing aspects of novel flowmeters. Emphasis is given to papers identifying new sensor configurations, multisensor flow measurement systems, non-intrusive flow metering techniques and the application of microelectronic techniques in smart or intelligent systems.
Calibration techniques: including descriptions of new or existing calibration facilities and techniques, calibration data from different flowmeter types, and calibration intercomparison data from different laboratories.
Installation effect data: dealing with the effects of non-ideal flow conditions on flowmeters. Papers combining a theoretical understanding of flowmeter behaviour with experimental work are particularly welcome.