Exploring the spatial effect of China's carbon emission trading scheme on green total factor productivity: An SBM-MML measurement and its decomposition

IF 9 1区工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS

Energy Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2025.135269

Zhengzhong Wang , Shuihan Liu , Yunjie Wei , Shouyang Wang

{"title":"Exploring the spatial effect of China's carbon emission trading scheme on green total factor productivity: An SBM-MML measurement and its decomposition","authors":"Zhengzhong Wang , Shuihan Liu , Yunjie Wei , Shouyang Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.energy.2025.135269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To obtain a detailed evaluation of green total factor productivity (GTFP), a novel measurement, Slack Based Measure-Meta-frontier Malmquist Luenberger (SBM-MML) model, is proposed in this paper. Instead of decomposing the growth rate of GTFP, it can directly decompose the GTFP into three components representing technical efficiency, technological innovation and technical leadership, respectively. Taking the provincial data of China from 2005 to 2020, it is found that eastern China, followed by central China, northeast China and western China, has the highest level of GTFP, efficiency, technological innovation and technical leadership. Moreover, the technological level of eastern China is far ahead of the national average level. In 2013, to explore the mechanism of carbon emission reduction, the Chinese government launched a carbon emissions trading scheme (CETS) in seven pilot regions. In this paper, the spatial difference-in-differences (SDID) model is used to measure the direct effect and the spatial effect of the CETS pilot policy on the GTFP and its components. It is found that the CETS pilot policy has a positive effect and a positive spillover effect on the GTFP, whereas a negative siphon effect on technological innovation is also indicated. Finally, based on the results, several policy implications are put forward.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11647,"journal":{"name":"Energy","volume":"320 ","pages":"Article 135269"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225009119","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

To obtain a detailed evaluation of green total factor productivity (GTFP), a novel measurement, Slack Based Measure-Meta-frontier Malmquist Luenberger (SBM-MML) model, is proposed in this paper. Instead of decomposing the growth rate of GTFP, it can directly decompose the GTFP into three components representing technical efficiency, technological innovation and technical leadership, respectively. Taking the provincial data of China from 2005 to 2020, it is found that eastern China, followed by central China, northeast China and western China, has the highest level of GTFP, efficiency, technological innovation and technical leadership. Moreover, the technological level of eastern China is far ahead of the national average level. In 2013, to explore the mechanism of carbon emission reduction, the Chinese government launched a carbon emissions trading scheme (CETS) in seven pilot regions. In this paper, the spatial difference-in-differences (SDID) model is used to measure the direct effect and the spatial effect of the CETS pilot policy on the GTFP and its components. It is found that the CETS pilot policy has a positive effect and a positive spillover effect on the GTFP, whereas a negative siphon effect on technological innovation is also indicated. Finally, based on the results, several policy implications are put forward.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Energy 工程技术-能源与燃料

CiteScore

15.30

自引率

14.40%

发文量

审稿时长

14.2 weeks

期刊介绍： Energy is a multidisciplinary, international journal that publishes research and analysis in the field of energy engineering. Our aim is to become a leading peer-reviewed platform and a trusted source of information for energy-related topics. The journal covers a range of areas including mechanical engineering, thermal sciences, and energy analysis. We are particularly interested in research on energy modelling, prediction, integrated energy systems, planning, and management. Additionally, we welcome papers on energy conservation, efficiency, biomass and bioenergy, renewable energy, electricity supply and demand, energy storage, buildings, and economic and policy issues. These topics should align with our broader multidisciplinary focus.