Efficacy and safety of subtotal pelvic peritonectomy for colorectal cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis confined to the pelvic cavity

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Ejso Pub Date : 2025-02-16 DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2025.109703
Jinghua Tang , Leen Liao , Binyi Xiao , Qiaoqi Sui , Muxu Zheng, Wu Jiang, Kai Han, Lingheng Kong, Zhizhong Pan, Peirong Ding
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of subtotal pelvic peritonectomy for colorectal cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis confined to the pelvic cavity","authors":"Jinghua Tang ,&nbsp;Leen Liao ,&nbsp;Binyi Xiao ,&nbsp;Qiaoqi Sui ,&nbsp;Muxu Zheng,&nbsp;Wu Jiang,&nbsp;Kai Han,&nbsp;Lingheng Kong,&nbsp;Zhizhong Pan,&nbsp;Peirong Ding","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2025.109703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cytoreductive surgery has shown survival benefits for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with peritoneal metastasis. However, the optimal extent of peritonectomy remains controversial in cases of limited peritoneal metastases. This study modified selective pelvic peritonectomy (SPP) into subtotal pelvic peritonectomy (STPP) for metastasis confined to pelvic cavity, and aimed to evaluate its feasibility, safety, and impact on survival outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>CRC patients with limited peritoneal metastasis confined to the pelvic cavity who underwent CC0 (no macroscopic residual cancer remained) resection were included from a prospectively collected database. Surgical complications, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 67 patients were included (26 in the STPP group and 41 in the SPP group). Clinically, STPP was found to be feasible and without increased surgical complications or mortality rates. At a median follow-up of 33.9 months, the 3-year DFS was 65.9 % and 30.7 % in STPP and SPP groups, respectively (<em>P</em> <em>=</em> 0.002). The 3-year OS was 84.1 % and 68.5 % in STPP and SPP groups, respectively (<em>P</em> <em>=</em> 0.006). Moreover, STTP was independently associated with improved DFS (<em>HR</em> = 0.351, 95 % <em>CI</em> 0.165–0.745, <em>P</em> <em>=</em> 0.006) and OS (<em>HR</em> = 0.324, 95 % <em>CI</em> 0.116–0.902, <em>P=</em>0.032). Female gender was also independently associated with poor DFS (<em>HR</em> = 2.146, 95 % <em>CI</em> 1.078–4.271, <em>P</em> <em>=</em> 0.031). Among 24 female patients with remaining ovaries, 9 (37.5 %) cases developed metachronous ovarian metastasis, and of these 6 underwent a second operation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Subtotal pelvic peritonectomy is associated with promising long-term outcomes in CRC patients with peritoneal metastasis confined to the pelvic cavity. Prophylactic bilateral oophorectomy should be strongly considered during cytoreductive surgery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11522,"journal":{"name":"Ejso","volume":"51 5","pages":"Article 109703"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ejso","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748798325001313","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Cytoreductive surgery has shown survival benefits for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with peritoneal metastasis. However, the optimal extent of peritonectomy remains controversial in cases of limited peritoneal metastases. This study modified selective pelvic peritonectomy (SPP) into subtotal pelvic peritonectomy (STPP) for metastasis confined to pelvic cavity, and aimed to evaluate its feasibility, safety, and impact on survival outcomes.

Materials and methods

CRC patients with limited peritoneal metastasis confined to the pelvic cavity who underwent CC0 (no macroscopic residual cancer remained) resection were included from a prospectively collected database. Surgical complications, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed.

Results

A total of 67 patients were included (26 in the STPP group and 41 in the SPP group). Clinically, STPP was found to be feasible and without increased surgical complications or mortality rates. At a median follow-up of 33.9 months, the 3-year DFS was 65.9 % and 30.7 % in STPP and SPP groups, respectively (P = 0.002). The 3-year OS was 84.1 % and 68.5 % in STPP and SPP groups, respectively (P = 0.006). Moreover, STTP was independently associated with improved DFS (HR = 0.351, 95 % CI 0.165–0.745, P = 0.006) and OS (HR = 0.324, 95 % CI 0.116–0.902, P=0.032). Female gender was also independently associated with poor DFS (HR = 2.146, 95 % CI 1.078–4.271, P = 0.031). Among 24 female patients with remaining ovaries, 9 (37.5 %) cases developed metachronous ovarian metastasis, and of these 6 underwent a second operation.

Conclusions

Subtotal pelvic peritonectomy is associated with promising long-term outcomes in CRC patients with peritoneal metastasis confined to the pelvic cavity. Prophylactic bilateral oophorectomy should be strongly considered during cytoreductive surgery.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ejso
Ejso 医学-外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1148
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: JSO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology ("the Journal of Cancer Surgery") is the Official Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and BASO ~ the Association for Cancer Surgery. The EJSO aims to advance surgical oncology research and practice through the publication of original research articles, review articles, editorials, debates and correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信