Knowledge, attitude, and practice among community pharmacists toward adverse drug reaction reporting and pharmacovigilance: A nationwide survey

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Tahani Alwidyan , Mohannad Odeh , Ameerah Hasan Ibrahim , Eman Harahsheh , Aya Banat
{"title":"Knowledge, attitude, and practice among community pharmacists toward adverse drug reaction reporting and pharmacovigilance: A nationwide survey","authors":"Tahani Alwidyan ,&nbsp;Mohannad Odeh ,&nbsp;Ameerah Hasan Ibrahim ,&nbsp;Eman Harahsheh ,&nbsp;Aya Banat","doi":"10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>To enhance the impact of pharmacovigilance on drug safety, it must be integrated into the healthcare system. This study aimed to examine community pharmacists' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding adverse drug reaction reporting and pharmacovigilance.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A self-administered, cross-sectional questionnaire study was conducted among eligible community pharmacists between July and September 2023. Participants completed online and paper-based questionnaires after providing prior consent. Descriptive and inferential analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS, version 28). One-way ANOVA was used to assess the significance of the association between knowledge, attitude, practice scores, and demographic characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 239 pharmacists completed the questionnaire (response rate of 67.5 %). Of them, 65.3 % were females. Poor knowledge regarding pharmacovigilance was evident in 66.1 % of participants, while only 11 % demonstrated good knowledge. Attitudes were primarily neutral (72.8 %), and practices were categorized as fair for 41.0 % and poor for 31.0 % of pharmacists. Significant factors influencing adverse drug reaction reporting included years of experience (<em>P</em> = 0.012) and awareness of the pharmacovigilance center (<em>P</em> = 0.000). The serious nature of adverse drug reactions was identified as the key facilitator for reporting (40.5 %), while well-documented adverse drug reactions in the literature (21.2 %) and lack of time (19.5 %) were the primary barriers among pharmacists.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study emphasizes the potential enhancement of adverse drug reaction reporting among community pharmacists by addressing poor knowledge, neutral attitudes, and barriers like time constraints. Targeted educational interventions and structured reporting frameworks are essential to enhance pharmacovigilance and ensure medication safety.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73003,"journal":{"name":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100578"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276625000198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

To enhance the impact of pharmacovigilance on drug safety, it must be integrated into the healthcare system. This study aimed to examine community pharmacists' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding adverse drug reaction reporting and pharmacovigilance.

Methods

A self-administered, cross-sectional questionnaire study was conducted among eligible community pharmacists between July and September 2023. Participants completed online and paper-based questionnaires after providing prior consent. Descriptive and inferential analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS, version 28). One-way ANOVA was used to assess the significance of the association between knowledge, attitude, practice scores, and demographic characteristics.

Results

A total of 239 pharmacists completed the questionnaire (response rate of 67.5 %). Of them, 65.3 % were females. Poor knowledge regarding pharmacovigilance was evident in 66.1 % of participants, while only 11 % demonstrated good knowledge. Attitudes were primarily neutral (72.8 %), and practices were categorized as fair for 41.0 % and poor for 31.0 % of pharmacists. Significant factors influencing adverse drug reaction reporting included years of experience (P = 0.012) and awareness of the pharmacovigilance center (P = 0.000). The serious nature of adverse drug reactions was identified as the key facilitator for reporting (40.5 %), while well-documented adverse drug reactions in the literature (21.2 %) and lack of time (19.5 %) were the primary barriers among pharmacists.

Conclusion

This study emphasizes the potential enhancement of adverse drug reaction reporting among community pharmacists by addressing poor knowledge, neutral attitudes, and barriers like time constraints. Targeted educational interventions and structured reporting frameworks are essential to enhance pharmacovigilance and ensure medication safety.
社区药师对药物不良反应报告和药物警戒的知识、态度和实践:一项全国性调查
背景:为了加强药物警戒对药物安全的影响,必须将其纳入卫生保健系统。本研究旨在调查社区药师在药物不良反应报告和药物警戒方面的知识、态度和实践。方法于2023年7 - 9月对符合条件的社区药师进行自我管理的横断面问卷调查。参与者在事先表示同意后,完成了在线和纸质调查问卷。使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS,版本28)进行描述性和推断性分析。采用单因素方差分析(One-way ANOVA)评估知识、态度、实践得分和人口统计学特征之间相关性的显著性。结果共有239名药师完成问卷调查,回复率为67.5%。其中65.3%为女性。66.1%的参与者明显缺乏药物警戒知识,而只有11%的参与者表现出良好的知识。态度基本上是中性的(72.8%),41.0%的药剂师认为做法公平,31.0%的药剂师认为做法差。影响药物不良反应报告的显著因素包括经验年限(P = 0.012)和对药物警戒中心的了解(P = 0.000)。药物不良反应的严重性质被确定为报告的关键因素(40.5%),而文献记录充分的药物不良反应(21.2%)和缺乏时间(19.5%)是药师的主要障碍。结论本研究强调通过解决知识贫乏、态度中立和时间限制等障碍,提高社区药师药物不良反应报告工作的潜力。有针对性的教育干预措施和结构化的报告框架对于加强药物警戒和确保用药安全至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信