Carmen Amor Costa , Cristina Suárez Ferrer , Laura García Ramírez , Eduardo Martín-Arranz , Joaquín Poza Cordón , José Luis Rueda García , María Sánchez Azofra , Irene González Diaz , Clara Amiama Roig , María Dolores Martín-Arranz
{"title":"Evaluation of the transition from intravenous to subcutaneous vedolizumab in patients with inflammatory bowel disease","authors":"Carmen Amor Costa , Cristina Suárez Ferrer , Laura García Ramírez , Eduardo Martín-Arranz , Joaquín Poza Cordón , José Luis Rueda García , María Sánchez Azofra , Irene González Diaz , Clara Amiama Roig , María Dolores Martín-Arranz","doi":"10.1016/j.gastre.2025.502201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>The aim of the study is to evaluate the clinical and biochemical response of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients treated with vedolizumab, 16 weeks after transitioning from intravenous (iv) to subcutaneous (sc).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An observational, prospective, single-center cohort study was performed. Patients with IBD and maintenance treatment with vedolizumab, stable for at least 4 mo, were offered to switch to sc formulation. At the same time of treatment administration a blood test was performed, with vedolizumab levels and fecal calprotectin.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Forty-three patients were included, 12 of them (27.9%) chose to transition to sc formulation. All included patients remained in remission during follow-up. At week 16 (w16), no significant differences were found in terms of calprotectin levels in patients on iv treatment (mean 146.6 ± SD 45.9) vs. sc (159.26 ± 53.9) (p 0.9). Vedolizumab serum levels at w16 were higher in the sc group (22364.3 ± 5141.6) vs. iv (11425.9 ± 1514.2) (p 0.009). At w16, 9 (75%) of the patients in the SC group were highly satisfied with the medication and 11 (91.7%) considered it easy to administer. 4 patients (12.9%) in the iv group and 2 (16.6%) in the sc group presented mild adverse effects. The 2 cases (100%) of the sc group the adverse event was local inflammation at the injection site.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In our experience, vedolizumab sc is a convenient alternative to iv administration. Vedolizumab serum levels in patients who transitioned to sc were higher than iv formulation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100569,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterología y Hepatología (English Edition)","volume":"48 3","pages":"Article 502201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterología y Hepatología (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444382425000148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims
The aim of the study is to evaluate the clinical and biochemical response of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients treated with vedolizumab, 16 weeks after transitioning from intravenous (iv) to subcutaneous (sc).
Methods
An observational, prospective, single-center cohort study was performed. Patients with IBD and maintenance treatment with vedolizumab, stable for at least 4 mo, were offered to switch to sc formulation. At the same time of treatment administration a blood test was performed, with vedolizumab levels and fecal calprotectin.
Results
Forty-three patients were included, 12 of them (27.9%) chose to transition to sc formulation. All included patients remained in remission during follow-up. At week 16 (w16), no significant differences were found in terms of calprotectin levels in patients on iv treatment (mean 146.6 ± SD 45.9) vs. sc (159.26 ± 53.9) (p 0.9). Vedolizumab serum levels at w16 were higher in the sc group (22364.3 ± 5141.6) vs. iv (11425.9 ± 1514.2) (p 0.009). At w16, 9 (75%) of the patients in the SC group were highly satisfied with the medication and 11 (91.7%) considered it easy to administer. 4 patients (12.9%) in the iv group and 2 (16.6%) in the sc group presented mild adverse effects. The 2 cases (100%) of the sc group the adverse event was local inflammation at the injection site.
Conclusion
In our experience, vedolizumab sc is a convenient alternative to iv administration. Vedolizumab serum levels in patients who transitioned to sc were higher than iv formulation.