“The system's not getting my grandchild”: A qualitative study of caregiver relationship formation for children born to incarcerated mothers

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Bethany Kotlar , Aisha Yousafzai , Carolyn Sufrin , Monik Jimenez , Henning Tiemeier
{"title":"“The system's not getting my grandchild”: A qualitative study of caregiver relationship formation for children born to incarcerated mothers","authors":"Bethany Kotlar ,&nbsp;Aisha Yousafzai ,&nbsp;Carolyn Sufrin ,&nbsp;Monik Jimenez ,&nbsp;Henning Tiemeier","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Women who give birth during their incarceration in most states in the US are separated from their newborns, who are placed with non-maternal caregivers. Infants of incarcerated mothers are a highly vulnerable population for which caregiving relationships may be particularly important for their wellbeing. Despite this, incarcerated mothers may be responsible for selecting a caregiver with no formal guidance. However, this process is poorly understood. The goal of this study was to understand how families form caregiving relationships during a mother's incarceration in state prisons in Georgia. Data were drawn from initial interviews from a mixed methods cohort of children exposed prenatally to incarceration. Thirty-six interviews with caregivers and 13 interviews with mothers released from incarceration were analyzed using thematic analysis. Researchers validated data through focus groups with caregivers and nonprofit staff. Caregivers and formerly incarcerated mothers discussed avoiding child welfare custody when making caregiving decisions. Mothers prioritized caregivers who they believed would help them reunify with the child. Caregivers and mothers discussed keeping the child with a family member if possible; mothers overwhelmingly preferred their own parents as caregivers. When mothers choose between several potential caregivers, they prioritized the safety and security of their infant, rejecting those who were substance users, had a history of incarceration, had serious health issues, or who they deemed irresponsible. These factors were frequently brought up when discussing children's fathers as potential caregivers. Thus, choice of caregivers for infants born during incarceration was motivated by family unity and safety and security. Policymakers should target these children and their families for intensive support through social services.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"370 ","pages":"Article 117881"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625002102","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Women who give birth during their incarceration in most states in the US are separated from their newborns, who are placed with non-maternal caregivers. Infants of incarcerated mothers are a highly vulnerable population for which caregiving relationships may be particularly important for their wellbeing. Despite this, incarcerated mothers may be responsible for selecting a caregiver with no formal guidance. However, this process is poorly understood. The goal of this study was to understand how families form caregiving relationships during a mother's incarceration in state prisons in Georgia. Data were drawn from initial interviews from a mixed methods cohort of children exposed prenatally to incarceration. Thirty-six interviews with caregivers and 13 interviews with mothers released from incarceration were analyzed using thematic analysis. Researchers validated data through focus groups with caregivers and nonprofit staff. Caregivers and formerly incarcerated mothers discussed avoiding child welfare custody when making caregiving decisions. Mothers prioritized caregivers who they believed would help them reunify with the child. Caregivers and mothers discussed keeping the child with a family member if possible; mothers overwhelmingly preferred their own parents as caregivers. When mothers choose between several potential caregivers, they prioritized the safety and security of their infant, rejecting those who were substance users, had a history of incarceration, had serious health issues, or who they deemed irresponsible. These factors were frequently brought up when discussing children's fathers as potential caregivers. Thus, choice of caregivers for infants born during incarceration was motivated by family unity and safety and security. Policymakers should target these children and their families for intensive support through social services.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信