Nickel: A tale of two cities

Richard Schodde , Pietro Guj
{"title":"Nickel: A tale of two cities","authors":"Richard Schodde ,&nbsp;Pietro Guj","doi":"10.1016/j.geogeo.2025.100356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Asides from subsea manganese nodules, there are essentially three main sources of nickel (Ni) supply: newly mined (1) magmatic Ni sulfide ore, (2) Ni laterites (limonitic and saprolitic) and (3) new and old End-of-life (EoL) recycled stainless steel scrap, mostly melted to produce stainless steel of similar grade. Traditionally Ni sulfide ore has been refined into high-purity, LME-deliverable, Class 1 products, such as Ni briquettes and powder for a range of specialised applications, besides stainless steel, including chemical EV battery precursors. By contrast, Ni laterites have been in the past the primary source of lower-purity, Class 2 products, such as ferronickel and nickel pig iron (NPI) as feed for stainless steel production. Processing of Ni laterites using high pressure acid leaching (HPAL) has generally proven to be technically complex and often the source of financial problems. This, however, has changed starting with a daring but successful gamble on the side of Ni-laterite-rich Indonesia that, in an endeavour to attract investment in downstream processing, in 2014 introduced a ban on the exportation of Ni ore, giving local miners 5 years to establish their processing facilities. Initially the Indonesian Ni industry languished, much to the benefit of Ni producers elsewhere, until China entered the scene financing downstream processing of Ni laterites at an unprecedented scale and more recently introducing innovative improvements to the HPAL process to a level that makes production of refined Ni products from laterites, not only possible, but competitive with traditional Ni sulfide sources. This has had a devastating effect on Ni sulfide mines, with many suspending and others reducing production. There is no doubt that economies of scale, metallurgical innovation, and massive, low-cost Chinese funding are behind this success, even though the Ni sulfide sector claims that central to it is a somewhat accommodating attitude on the side of the Indonesian environmental authorities. The attempt on the side of Ni sulfide miners to differentiate themselves as ‘clean’ Ni producers deserving a price premium did not get traction, but concerns regarding the environment, the impact on the affected communities, and the long-term sustainability of the lateritic Ni resources appear to be emerging as serious political issues in Indonesia. The paper analyses the size, composition, and geographical distribution of the current world Ni resources, their growth, and their capacity to satisfy the medium-term increase in demand due to the transition to clean energy despite diminishing exploration discoveries. It also speculates on how long the current laterite dominance of the Ni market may persist before the pendulum may swing back to Ni sulfides. Despite rising environmental pressure, there appears to be a reasonable chance that current and foreseeable Ni resources may prove adequate to satisfy rising demand in the short to medium term. By contrast, modelling indicates that there will be inevitable severe pressure on Ni supply in the next century and beyond. Opinions, however, differ as to the degree to which these will represent a treat to human civilisation. These range from catastrophic consequences to greater faith in human ingenuity enabling a slow, progressive process of adaptation to use primary Ni more sparingly as it becomes increasingly scarce and unbearably expensive, because of the exponential increase in the cost of metallurgy and disposal of mine waste inherent in extracting Ni from progressively lower grade and deeper deposits. The push will be to lower Ni-intensity, developing material technology substitutes for it in consumptive applications, and by promoting innovative manufacturing with a clear focus on re-cycling, to achieve the highest possible level of circularity. Hopefully, a balance may eventually be reached, not without some significant sacrifices in terms of living standards, whereby Ni demand will be reduced to a sustainable level that can be satisfied indefinitely primarily by recycled Ni complemented by limited quantities of primary Ni.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100582,"journal":{"name":"Geosystems and Geoenvironment","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100356"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geosystems and Geoenvironment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772883825000068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Asides from subsea manganese nodules, there are essentially three main sources of nickel (Ni) supply: newly mined (1) magmatic Ni sulfide ore, (2) Ni laterites (limonitic and saprolitic) and (3) new and old End-of-life (EoL) recycled stainless steel scrap, mostly melted to produce stainless steel of similar grade. Traditionally Ni sulfide ore has been refined into high-purity, LME-deliverable, Class 1 products, such as Ni briquettes and powder for a range of specialised applications, besides stainless steel, including chemical EV battery precursors. By contrast, Ni laterites have been in the past the primary source of lower-purity, Class 2 products, such as ferronickel and nickel pig iron (NPI) as feed for stainless steel production. Processing of Ni laterites using high pressure acid leaching (HPAL) has generally proven to be technically complex and often the source of financial problems. This, however, has changed starting with a daring but successful gamble on the side of Ni-laterite-rich Indonesia that, in an endeavour to attract investment in downstream processing, in 2014 introduced a ban on the exportation of Ni ore, giving local miners 5 years to establish their processing facilities. Initially the Indonesian Ni industry languished, much to the benefit of Ni producers elsewhere, until China entered the scene financing downstream processing of Ni laterites at an unprecedented scale and more recently introducing innovative improvements to the HPAL process to a level that makes production of refined Ni products from laterites, not only possible, but competitive with traditional Ni sulfide sources. This has had a devastating effect on Ni sulfide mines, with many suspending and others reducing production. There is no doubt that economies of scale, metallurgical innovation, and massive, low-cost Chinese funding are behind this success, even though the Ni sulfide sector claims that central to it is a somewhat accommodating attitude on the side of the Indonesian environmental authorities. The attempt on the side of Ni sulfide miners to differentiate themselves as ‘clean’ Ni producers deserving a price premium did not get traction, but concerns regarding the environment, the impact on the affected communities, and the long-term sustainability of the lateritic Ni resources appear to be emerging as serious political issues in Indonesia. The paper analyses the size, composition, and geographical distribution of the current world Ni resources, their growth, and their capacity to satisfy the medium-term increase in demand due to the transition to clean energy despite diminishing exploration discoveries. It also speculates on how long the current laterite dominance of the Ni market may persist before the pendulum may swing back to Ni sulfides. Despite rising environmental pressure, there appears to be a reasonable chance that current and foreseeable Ni resources may prove adequate to satisfy rising demand in the short to medium term. By contrast, modelling indicates that there will be inevitable severe pressure on Ni supply in the next century and beyond. Opinions, however, differ as to the degree to which these will represent a treat to human civilisation. These range from catastrophic consequences to greater faith in human ingenuity enabling a slow, progressive process of adaptation to use primary Ni more sparingly as it becomes increasingly scarce and unbearably expensive, because of the exponential increase in the cost of metallurgy and disposal of mine waste inherent in extracting Ni from progressively lower grade and deeper deposits. The push will be to lower Ni-intensity, developing material technology substitutes for it in consumptive applications, and by promoting innovative manufacturing with a clear focus on re-cycling, to achieve the highest possible level of circularity. Hopefully, a balance may eventually be reached, not without some significant sacrifices in terms of living standards, whereby Ni demand will be reduced to a sustainable level that can be satisfied indefinitely primarily by recycled Ni complemented by limited quantities of primary Ni.

Abstract Image

尼克尔:双城记
除了海底锰结核之外,镍(Ni)的主要供应来源基本上有三种:新开采的(1)岩浆镍硫化物矿,(2)镍红土(褐铁矿和腐泥岩)和(3)新旧报废(EoL)回收的不锈钢废料,大部分熔化后生产出类似品位的不锈钢。传统上,硫化镍矿石被提炼成高纯度、lme可交付的1类产品,如镍压块和粉末,用于一系列专业应用,除了不锈钢,包括化学电动汽车电池前体。相比之下,镍红土在过去一直是低纯度2类产品的主要来源,如镍铁和镍生铁(NPI)作为不锈钢生产的原料。利用高压酸浸法(HPAL)处理红土镍矿通常被证明在技术上是复杂的,而且往往是财务问题的根源。然而,这种情况发生了改变,开始于镍红土资源丰富的印尼进行了一次大胆但成功的赌博。2014年,为了吸引对下游加工的投资,印尼出台了镍矿石出口禁令,给当地矿商5年时间建立加工设施。最初,印尼的镍产业萧条,这对其他地方的镍生产商大有好处,直到中国以前所未有的规模为红土镍的下游加工提供资金,最近又对HPAL工艺进行了创新改进,使红土镍精炼产品的生产不仅成为可能,而且与传统的硫化镍来源具有竞争力。这对硫化镍矿造成了毁灭性的影响,许多硫化镍矿停产,其他硫化镍矿减产。毫无疑问,这一成功的背后是规模经济、冶金创新和大量低成本的中国资金,尽管硫化镍行业声称,这一成功的核心是印尼环保部门的某种宽容态度。硫化镍矿商试图将自己区分为“清洁”镍生产商,理应获得价格溢价,但这一尝试并未获得支持,但对环境、对受影响社区的影响以及红土镍资源的长期可持续性的担忧似乎正在成为印尼严重的政治问题。本文分析了当前世界镍资源的规模、组成和地理分布,它们的增长,以及它们满足中期需求增长的能力,这是由于向清洁能源的过渡,尽管勘探发现减少了。它还推测,在镍市场的钟摆回到镍硫化物之前,目前红土的主导地位可能会持续多久。尽管环境压力越来越大,但目前和可预见的镍资源似乎有足够的机会在中短期内满足不断增长的需求。相比之下,模拟表明,在下个世纪及以后,镍供应将不可避免地面临严重压力。然而,对于这些将在多大程度上代表对人类文明的款待,意见不一。这些后果包括灾难性的后果,以及对人类创造力的更大信心,使人们能够缓慢而渐进地适应更少使用原生镍的过程,因为它变得越来越稀缺,而且价格高得令人难以忍受,因为从品位越来越低、更深的矿床中提取镍所固有的冶金成本和矿山废物处理成本呈指数级增长。推动将是降低镍强度,在消费应用中开发材料技术替代品,并通过促进创新制造,明确关注再循环,以实现尽可能高的循环水平。希望最终能够达到平衡,而不是在生活水平方面做出一些重大牺牲,从而将Ni需求降低到一个可持续的水平,主要通过回收Ni和有限数量的原生Ni来无限期地满足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信