Divorce in same-sex and opposite-sex couples: The roles of intermarriage, religious affiliation, and income

IF 3.4 2区 社会学 Q1 Medicine
Elina Einiö , Maria Ponkilainen
{"title":"Divorce in same-sex and opposite-sex couples: The roles of intermarriage, religious affiliation, and income","authors":"Elina Einiö ,&nbsp;Maria Ponkilainen","doi":"10.1016/j.alcr.2025.100669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Studies have shown that the risk of divorce is higher for same-sex couples, especially for female couples, compared to opposite-sex couples. However, the underlying reasons are still poorly understood, despite their potential to deepen our understanding of gender roles and intersecting identities. We examine whether nationality intermarriage, religious affiliation, education, or income of the spouses plays any role in explaining the heightened divorce risk among same-sex couples. Drawing on prospective register data of same-sex couples (n = 3780) and opposite-sex couples (n = 339,401) from Finland, the results suggest that income and religious affiliation play roles—although modest—in explaining female couples’ heightened divorce risks, whereas intermarriage is more important for male couples. Intermarriage between a foreign-born husband and a native-born spouse appears to destabilize marriages, regardless of the latter spouse’s gender, indicating that being a man in a host society can strain marriages. Dissimilarity in spouses’ religious affiliations increases divorce risk in same-sex couples, particularly in male couples. Elevated income of the presumed primary breadwinner (husband or older spouse) stabilizes marriages, regardless of the gender composition of the couple, whereas increased income of the secondary breadwinner (wife or younger spouse) stabilizes same-sex marriages only. The implication is that intersections of gender norms and other identities shape divorce risks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47126,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Life Course Research","volume":"64 ","pages":"Article 100669"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Life Course Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569490925000139","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies have shown that the risk of divorce is higher for same-sex couples, especially for female couples, compared to opposite-sex couples. However, the underlying reasons are still poorly understood, despite their potential to deepen our understanding of gender roles and intersecting identities. We examine whether nationality intermarriage, religious affiliation, education, or income of the spouses plays any role in explaining the heightened divorce risk among same-sex couples. Drawing on prospective register data of same-sex couples (n = 3780) and opposite-sex couples (n = 339,401) from Finland, the results suggest that income and religious affiliation play roles—although modest—in explaining female couples’ heightened divorce risks, whereas intermarriage is more important for male couples. Intermarriage between a foreign-born husband and a native-born spouse appears to destabilize marriages, regardless of the latter spouse’s gender, indicating that being a man in a host society can strain marriages. Dissimilarity in spouses’ religious affiliations increases divorce risk in same-sex couples, particularly in male couples. Elevated income of the presumed primary breadwinner (husband or older spouse) stabilizes marriages, regardless of the gender composition of the couple, whereas increased income of the secondary breadwinner (wife or younger spouse) stabilizes same-sex marriages only. The implication is that intersections of gender norms and other identities shape divorce risks.
同性和异性夫妻的离婚:异族婚姻、宗教信仰和收入的作用
研究表明,与异性伴侣相比,同性伴侣离婚的风险更高,尤其是女性伴侣。然而,尽管它们有可能加深我们对性别角色和交叉身份的理解,但潜在的原因仍然知之甚少。我们研究了国籍、异族婚姻、宗教信仰、教育或配偶的收入是否在解释同性伴侣离婚风险增加方面发挥了任何作用。根据芬兰同性伴侣(n = 3780)和异性伴侣(n = 339,401)的预期登记数据,结果表明,收入和宗教信仰在解释女性伴侣离婚风险增加方面发挥了作用(尽管不那么重要),而异族婚姻对男性伴侣来说更重要。在外国出生的丈夫和在本国出生的配偶之间的通婚似乎会破坏婚姻的稳定,无论后者的性别如何,这表明在东道国社会中,作为一名男性可能会使婚姻变得紧张。配偶宗教信仰的不同增加了同性伴侣离婚的风险,尤其是男性伴侣。假定的主要养家者(丈夫或年长的配偶)的收入增加可以稳定婚姻,无论夫妻的性别构成如何,而次要养家者(妻子或年轻的配偶)的收入增加只能稳定同性婚姻。其含义是,性别规范和其他身份的交集塑造了离婚风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Life Course Research
Advances in Life Course Research SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Advances in Life Course Research publishes articles dealing with various aspects of the human life course. Seeing life course research as an essentially interdisciplinary field of study, it invites and welcomes contributions from anthropology, biosocial science, demography, epidemiology and statistics, gerontology, economics, management and organisation science, policy studies, psychology, research methodology and sociology. Original empirical analyses, theoretical contributions, methodological studies and reviews accessible to a broad set of readers are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信