COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy among hemodialysis patients: A mixed-methods study

IF 2.7 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Yuka Sugawara , Masao Iwagami , Kan Kikuchi , Toyohiro Hashiba , Sayaka Yabushita , Risa Hara , Toshio Hasegawa , Iino Yasuhiko , Masaomi Nangaku
{"title":"COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy among hemodialysis patients: A mixed-methods study","authors":"Yuka Sugawara ,&nbsp;Masao Iwagami ,&nbsp;Kan Kikuchi ,&nbsp;Toyohiro Hashiba ,&nbsp;Sayaka Yabushita ,&nbsp;Risa Hara ,&nbsp;Toshio Hasegawa ,&nbsp;Iino Yasuhiko ,&nbsp;Masaomi Nangaku","doi":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Vaccine hesitancy is a long-standing concept popularized during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. However, the underlying reasons and factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among hemodialysis patients have not been thoroughly investigated. Thus, here we investigated these issues using a mixed-methods approach.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A questionnaire survey was conducted of 1086 voluntary hemodialysis patients at 36 Japanese facilities. The questionnaire asked about detailed background factors, COVID-19 vaccination status, and reasons for non-vaccination. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted of vaccine hesitancy, and 10 unvaccinated patients were interviewed to further investigate their reasons for non-vaccination.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 54 (5.0 %) unvaccinated and 1032 (95.0 %) vaccinated participants. In the multivariate analysis, COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was independently associated with a history of anaphylaxis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.05; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.46–11.21), living with an unvaccinated person (OR, 4.90; 95 % CI, 2.51–9.56), and using X (formerly Twitter) as the main source of information (aOR, 8.58; 95 % CI, 1.86–39.58), whereas those who received an annual influenza vaccination were less likely to show COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy (aOR, 0.19; 95 % CI, 0.1–0.36). The interview findings suggested that other factors associated with non-vaccination were not included in the questionnaire survey, such as missing opportunities to receive the initial vaccination and doctors' suggestions to avoid vaccination.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study combined qualitative and quantitative methods to identify several factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among hemodialysis patients. These results will be useful during future pandemics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43021,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine: X","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100623"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590136225000178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Vaccine hesitancy is a long-standing concept popularized during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. However, the underlying reasons and factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among hemodialysis patients have not been thoroughly investigated. Thus, here we investigated these issues using a mixed-methods approach.

Methods

A questionnaire survey was conducted of 1086 voluntary hemodialysis patients at 36 Japanese facilities. The questionnaire asked about detailed background factors, COVID-19 vaccination status, and reasons for non-vaccination. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted of vaccine hesitancy, and 10 unvaccinated patients were interviewed to further investigate their reasons for non-vaccination.

Results

There were 54 (5.0 %) unvaccinated and 1032 (95.0 %) vaccinated participants. In the multivariate analysis, COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was independently associated with a history of anaphylaxis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.05; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.46–11.21), living with an unvaccinated person (OR, 4.90; 95 % CI, 2.51–9.56), and using X (formerly Twitter) as the main source of information (aOR, 8.58; 95 % CI, 1.86–39.58), whereas those who received an annual influenza vaccination were less likely to show COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy (aOR, 0.19; 95 % CI, 0.1–0.36). The interview findings suggested that other factors associated with non-vaccination were not included in the questionnaire survey, such as missing opportunities to receive the initial vaccination and doctors' suggestions to avoid vaccination.

Conclusions

This study combined qualitative and quantitative methods to identify several factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among hemodialysis patients. These results will be useful during future pandemics.
血液透析患者COVID-19疫苗接种犹豫:一项混合方法研究
在2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间,疫苗犹豫是一个长期存在的概念。然而,与血液透析患者COVID-19疫苗犹豫相关的潜在原因和因素尚未得到彻底调查。因此,我们在这里使用混合方法研究这些问题。方法对日本36家医院的1086例自愿血液透析患者进行问卷调查。问卷询问了详细的背景因素、COVID-19疫苗接种情况和未接种疫苗的原因。对疫苗犹豫进行多因素logistic回归分析,并对10例未接种疫苗的患者进行访谈,进一步调查其不接种疫苗的原因。结果未接种者54人(5.0%),接种者1032人(95.0%)。在多因素分析中,COVID-19疫苗犹豫与过敏史独立相关(调整优势比[aOR], 4.05;95%可信区间[CI], 1.46-11.21),与未接种疫苗的人生活在一起(OR, 4.90;95% CI, 2.51-9.56),并使用X(以前的Twitter)作为主要信息来源(aOR, 8.58;95% CI, 1.86-39.58),而那些每年接受流感疫苗接种的人不太可能出现COVID-19疫苗犹豫(aOR, 0.19;95% ci, 0.1-0.36)。访谈结果显示,未接种疫苗的其他相关因素未包括在问卷调查中,如错过初次接种疫苗的机会和医生建议避免接种疫苗。结论本研究结合定性和定量方法,确定了血液透析患者COVID-19疫苗犹豫的几个相关因素。这些结果将在未来的大流行期间发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vaccine: X
Vaccine: X Multiple-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
102
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信