Shuchen Wang , Chenxi Chong , Weibin Huang , Simeng Guo , Yuhan Wang , Yaopeng Zhang , Zhanlei Pan , Jian Wang , Xin Li , Wenqi Zhao , Zhenggui Zhang , Zhanbiao Wang
{"title":"Tracing the carbon footprint of cotton garments from seed to garment: Evidence from an empirical study of multiple sites in China","authors":"Shuchen Wang , Chenxi Chong , Weibin Huang , Simeng Guo , Yuhan Wang , Yaopeng Zhang , Zhanlei Pan , Jian Wang , Xin Li , Wenqi Zhao , Zhenggui Zhang , Zhanbiao Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from Chinese textile production are an important component of global industry, but their intensity varies by textile type. This study addresses the issue of scant research on the carbon footprint of cotton garments in China. Using cross-provincial surveys, emission coefficients, and life cycle assessment (LCA) methods, we analysed the environmental impact of five major types of cotton garments, providing insights into their environmental effects. The carbon footprints significantly differed among the five garments used in this study: childrenswear (2.42 kg CO<sub>2</sub>eq), knitwear (7.24 kg CO<sub>2</sub>eq), fatigues (38.64 kg CO<sub>2</sub>eq), T-shirts (9.18 kg CO<sub>2</sub>eq), and workwear (20.25 kg CO<sub>2</sub>eq). At the production stage of cotton, the main components of carbon emissions are electricity, nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) and fertilizers, accounting for 49.18, 18.84 and 14.10 % of emissions, respectively. The impacts of textile production depend on the energy cost, processing technique, and factory size. Additionally, we analysed four optimization scenarios—utilizing clean energy, optimizing factory sizes, using organic cotton, and enhancing recycling, which could reduce carbon footprints by 52.48, 30.43, 35.95 and 62.40 %, respectively. This finding suggests a potential approach for mitigating carbon emissions from cotton textile production and supporting the transformation of the cotton textile industry towards sustainable development, providing a basis for global emission reduction strategies in the cotton textile industry.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"217 ","pages":"Article 108200"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925000795","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from Chinese textile production are an important component of global industry, but their intensity varies by textile type. This study addresses the issue of scant research on the carbon footprint of cotton garments in China. Using cross-provincial surveys, emission coefficients, and life cycle assessment (LCA) methods, we analysed the environmental impact of five major types of cotton garments, providing insights into their environmental effects. The carbon footprints significantly differed among the five garments used in this study: childrenswear (2.42 kg CO2eq), knitwear (7.24 kg CO2eq), fatigues (38.64 kg CO2eq), T-shirts (9.18 kg CO2eq), and workwear (20.25 kg CO2eq). At the production stage of cotton, the main components of carbon emissions are electricity, nitrous oxide (N2O) and fertilizers, accounting for 49.18, 18.84 and 14.10 % of emissions, respectively. The impacts of textile production depend on the energy cost, processing technique, and factory size. Additionally, we analysed four optimization scenarios—utilizing clean energy, optimizing factory sizes, using organic cotton, and enhancing recycling, which could reduce carbon footprints by 52.48, 30.43, 35.95 and 62.40 %, respectively. This finding suggests a potential approach for mitigating carbon emissions from cotton textile production and supporting the transformation of the cotton textile industry towards sustainable development, providing a basis for global emission reduction strategies in the cotton textile industry.
期刊介绍:
The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns.
Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.