{"title":"Pollinator declines, international trade and global food security: Reassessing the global economic and nutritional impacts","authors":"Arndt Feuerbacher","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The decline in biodiversity is threatening the provision of vital ecosystem services such as animal-mediated pollination services. While about 17 % of the global crop production value depends on pollination services, these crops make up an even larger share—28 %—of global agricultural trade. This reflects their strong international demand and higher tradability compared to other agricultural commodities. Hence, global trade needs to be considered when assessing how pollinator population declines affect the availability of micronutrient-rich foods and economic welfare in net-importing and exporting regions. This paper critically reviews and extends a global partial equilibrium model covering about 120 edible crops across 22 regions while also capturing international trade. The replication efforts reveal significant methodological and empirical flaws in an earlier, comparable study. Most recent bioeconomic data on crop yield dependence on pollination services are used to simulate a global pollinator collapse. Crop prices are projected to rise by 30 %, leading to a global welfare loss of 729 billion USD, or 0.9 % of global GDP and 15.6 % of global agricultural production value used for human food in 2020. The revised model also reports substantial declines in food production and micronutrient availability such as an 8 % reduction in global Vitamin A availability. These estimates by far surpass previous estimates that were based on earlier bioeconomic data. The findings highlight the critical need for more robust modeling frameworks to inform policy decisions regarding the sustainability of agri-food systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"232 ","pages":"Article 108565"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800925000485","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The decline in biodiversity is threatening the provision of vital ecosystem services such as animal-mediated pollination services. While about 17 % of the global crop production value depends on pollination services, these crops make up an even larger share—28 %—of global agricultural trade. This reflects their strong international demand and higher tradability compared to other agricultural commodities. Hence, global trade needs to be considered when assessing how pollinator population declines affect the availability of micronutrient-rich foods and economic welfare in net-importing and exporting regions. This paper critically reviews and extends a global partial equilibrium model covering about 120 edible crops across 22 regions while also capturing international trade. The replication efforts reveal significant methodological and empirical flaws in an earlier, comparable study. Most recent bioeconomic data on crop yield dependence on pollination services are used to simulate a global pollinator collapse. Crop prices are projected to rise by 30 %, leading to a global welfare loss of 729 billion USD, or 0.9 % of global GDP and 15.6 % of global agricultural production value used for human food in 2020. The revised model also reports substantial declines in food production and micronutrient availability such as an 8 % reduction in global Vitamin A availability. These estimates by far surpass previous estimates that were based on earlier bioeconomic data. The findings highlight the critical need for more robust modeling frameworks to inform policy decisions regarding the sustainability of agri-food systems.
期刊介绍:
Ecological Economics is concerned with extending and integrating the understanding of the interfaces and interplay between "nature''s household" (ecosystems) and "humanity''s household" (the economy). Ecological economics is an interdisciplinary field defined by a set of concrete problems or challenges related to governing economic activity in a way that promotes human well-being, sustainability, and justice. The journal thus emphasizes critical work that draws on and integrates elements of ecological science, economics, and the analysis of values, behaviors, cultural practices, institutional structures, and societal dynamics. The journal is transdisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, drawing on the insights offered by a variety of intellectual traditions, and appealing to a diverse readership.
Specific research areas covered include: valuation of natural resources, sustainable agriculture and development, ecologically integrated technology, integrated ecologic-economic modelling at scales from local to regional to global, implications of thermodynamics for economics and ecology, renewable resource management and conservation, critical assessments of the basic assumptions underlying current economic and ecological paradigms and the implications of alternative assumptions, economic and ecological consequences of genetically engineered organisms, and gene pool inventory and management, alternative principles for valuing natural wealth, integrating natural resources and environmental services into national income and wealth accounts, methods of implementing efficient environmental policies, case studies of economic-ecologic conflict or harmony, etc. New issues in this area are rapidly emerging and will find a ready forum in Ecological Economics.