Machine learning uncertainty framework applied to gas-liquid horizontal pipe flow

IF 3.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 MECHANICS
André Mendes Quintino, Milan Stanko
{"title":"Machine learning uncertainty framework applied to gas-liquid horizontal pipe flow","authors":"André Mendes Quintino,&nbsp;Milan Stanko","doi":"10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2025.105184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate multiphase pipe flow modeling (e.g. prediction of pressure drop and volume fraction) is important for several disciplines and industries. It is possible to develop pipe multiphase flow models using laboratory data or simulator output and machine learning techniques but their application is limited due to their black-box nature and subpar generalization performance. The effectiveness of these models can be improved by “teaching the models to know what they know” and outputting the prediction uncertainty together with a mean value. By giving a stochastic prediction, the model can inform the user about the uncertainty of its prediction, facilitating informed decision-making. In this work, we evaluate 3 machine learning frameworks and 3 parametrization strategies for the development of a stochastic data-driven gas-liquid pipe flow (pressure and holdup) model. This to ultimately determine which machine learning framework and parametrization strategy produces stochastic models that best fit the data set, capture its associated uncertainty and where the predicted uncertainty grows considerably in extrapolation scenarios, rendering the model useless. For this purpose, a steady-state two-phase horizontal flow synthetic dataset was created using a commercial multiphase flow simulator to train and validate three deep learning frameworks: deep ensembles, hyper-deep ensembles, and Monte Carlo dropout. The effect of the performance using different groups of input features to predict the pressure gradient and holdup is also evaluated, and the performance metrics are assessed based on in-domain (validation) and out-of-domain (extrapolation) cases, the latter consisting of a scale-up scenario (bigger diameter). Results indicate that all three frameworks accurately predicted the mean values. However, deep ensembles outperformed the other in predicting the uncertainty range. Additionally, the results show the feature importance of different dimensional and dimensionless inputs for the model training and prediction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":339,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Multiphase Flow","volume":"187 ","pages":"Article 105184"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Multiphase Flow","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030193222500062X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate multiphase pipe flow modeling (e.g. prediction of pressure drop and volume fraction) is important for several disciplines and industries. It is possible to develop pipe multiphase flow models using laboratory data or simulator output and machine learning techniques but their application is limited due to their black-box nature and subpar generalization performance. The effectiveness of these models can be improved by “teaching the models to know what they know” and outputting the prediction uncertainty together with a mean value. By giving a stochastic prediction, the model can inform the user about the uncertainty of its prediction, facilitating informed decision-making. In this work, we evaluate 3 machine learning frameworks and 3 parametrization strategies for the development of a stochastic data-driven gas-liquid pipe flow (pressure and holdup) model. This to ultimately determine which machine learning framework and parametrization strategy produces stochastic models that best fit the data set, capture its associated uncertainty and where the predicted uncertainty grows considerably in extrapolation scenarios, rendering the model useless. For this purpose, a steady-state two-phase horizontal flow synthetic dataset was created using a commercial multiphase flow simulator to train and validate three deep learning frameworks: deep ensembles, hyper-deep ensembles, and Monte Carlo dropout. The effect of the performance using different groups of input features to predict the pressure gradient and holdup is also evaluated, and the performance metrics are assessed based on in-domain (validation) and out-of-domain (extrapolation) cases, the latter consisting of a scale-up scenario (bigger diameter). Results indicate that all three frameworks accurately predicted the mean values. However, deep ensembles outperformed the other in predicting the uncertainty range. Additionally, the results show the feature importance of different dimensional and dimensionless inputs for the model training and prediction.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
244
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Multiphase Flow publishes analytical, numerical and experimental articles of lasting interest. The scope of the journal includes all aspects of mass, momentum and energy exchange phenomena among different phases such as occur in disperse flows, gas–liquid and liquid–liquid flows, flows in porous media, boiling, granular flows and others. The journal publishes full papers, brief communications and conference announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信